In a article it was stated, “In addition, zoological parks and aquariums have played a role in helping to preserve species that have been driven close to extinction due to habitat loss and hunting” (Point). Taking an endangered animal out of its habitat and putting it in a place where it cannot be harmed will help out that species for a while. The Zoos main part it plays is protection for that endangered species, but what is questioned is the fact that is it actually being protected or is the Zoo causing more harm. In the article, “Zoos and Circuses: Overview”, it is correctly stated,” The birth of the environmental movement in the 1960s and '70s led to the establishment of laws protecting species threatened by extinction, including the 1973 Endangered Species Act (ESA) in the United States. These laws also established guidelines for establishing the conservation status of species and provided federal oversight over the keeping of rare or endangered animals.
Zoo animals also are safe from natural predators and hunting that occurs in the wild. With all the animals receiving food pertaining to their diets, it gives a bigger chance to the young of the animals. Captive animals are also safe from humans who poach or hunt them. Elephants in zoos, for examples, no longer have to worry about ivory hunters. While doing away of zoos completely may be too much of a steep step, a compromise may be able to satisfy both sides.
It is true that there are some circuses who don’t physically beat animals and choose not to harm animals physically, however there are forms of abuse other than physical that some people are unaware of. Because circus animals are abused beyond physical, all circuses should be set under harsher banning laws. Animals being locked in cages and taken away from their homes can be a form of psychological and emotional abuse. A research article, edited and cited by the Center for Cellular and Molecular Biology who are a biotechnology research establishment in India, discusses a study of the effects of wildlife in captivity, specifically the effects on the animal 's biology. The study, on Bengal tigers and leopards in Indian zoos, demonstrated stereotypical behavior of animals in captivity from stress compared to the biological and environmental factors the animals faced.
Because people think that, they support the zoos by giving them money to see these animals instead of going to animal preservations where the enclosures aren’t entirely man made. Animals that can function and survive in the wild should not be kept in zoos because the enclosures do not meet the needs of the animals living in them, zoos restrict animals from their innate behavior and their natural instincts, and zoos are expensive and damage animals homes. Enclosures in zoos do not provide everything the animal needs. In paragraph 6 in the article
Animal cruelty is becoming an issue that is too big to ignore. It can be defined as neglect or the infliction of pain or suffering towards animals. One might notice that this is an issue that is becoming more common in zoos and aquariums. These places can be wonderful for the animals, but can also portray an awful life for the captive animals. No animal should have to go through the pain and stress that many are suffering through.
In order to answer how is a nature reserve a better suit for animal care than a zoo, the conduct of this study is a compare and contrast research. This research presents facts on how zoos are harmful for animals, and how nature reserves are a better option through comparing and contrasting the animals` life in both zoos and nature reserves. I present evidence to answer the research question stated above. In order to answer the research and supporting questions, this study’s main instruments are comparing and contrasting life cuality in both places. • Great Apes In the wild, great apes live in dense tropical forests, where these highly social beings are constantly engaged and active in a rich and diverse environment.
Also, says it can be a source of national income and experimental field for example, experiments done on rats like replanting organs and in science of anatomy. However, According to Gershoff , some people and organization oppose using animals in medical researches like PETA, which is People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, is one of the well-known organization is strongly against animals experimentation and fight for animals welfare and rights . Also, according to Morgan animals behind fences in zoos and circus suffer from mental health problems because of their captivity even they tried to recreate a similar environment which they were
Researchers of a study performed on wild and captive orangutans write, “…Factors such as improper hygienic situations, improper diet, diseases, obesity, injuries from exhibits, poor adaption to a climate, spread of infections, inbreeding, and social stress might actually increase mortality in captivity”, (De Vries 680). The study described how the modern improvements for zoo animals have only recently matched the average survival rate of wild species. Although this statement is true to some degree, it can also be argued that studies on mental characteristic are not one hundred percent accurate. Another study on assessing the mental health of captive and wild chimpanzees describes the multitude of uncontrollable variables when testing hypothesizes. The testing methods are not catered specifically to nonhuman primates and to other non-vocal species.
And although there are benefits for animals in captivity, it could also be very bad for them. Zoos can be like prisons for the animals inside them, also living in a zoo could restrict natural behaviors that an animal would usually need, and also animal habitats have gotten destroyed and as a result, people put the surviving animals in zoos when in fact there is a much better alternative. Zoos can be like a prison for animals. In the article “Do Animals Loose in Zoos?” it references that a zoo is like a prison for an animal, and that is the truth. Animals need room to soar and run and play around and instead they are kept in a cage all day and aren’t given a lot of room to move and play around as they would please.
Animal testing is mandatory for human existence. Animal testing helps develop life saving cures, animals also benefit from it, and some products must be tested on animals before they can be released in stores. First, according to the text, “ Animal research has also contributed to major advances in understanding and treating conditions such as breast cancer, brain injury, childhood leukemia, cystic fibrosis, malaria, multiple sclerosis, tuberculosis and many others” (Should Animals Be Used 3). These life saving cures and treatments have made life easier. Imagine how many more cures we could have with animal testing.