All-white jury Essays

through his actions and behaviors within chapter 9 and 10. During the whole of chapter 9, Atticus reveals moral courage when he decides to defend and protect an innocent man named Tom Robinson. Who is a black man that has been accused of raping a white woman in the town Maycomb which is extremely racist. He observes the challenges that come with Tom Robinson’s case with his brother for one, there is no real evidence for Robinson’s

Final Essay Outline: Thesis Statement/opening paragraph: In the story To Kill A Mockingbird, discrimination and the act of being prejudice is common among the main characters, on both the receiving and serving end. Certain characters, like Scout and Jeremy Finch, Bob Ewell, and the town folk truly create the main problem and set the theme of the story. For example, when Bob Ewell accuses Atticus Finch of being an african-american lover, because he is defending Tom Robinson. Tom Robinson was accused

discriminated towards, and result in the segregation of culture groups. There are many examples of this found throughout case trials since the twentieth century and beyond. The Emmett Till case, for example, demonstrates the outcome of having a jury that is all from the same ethnicity, and allows common people to understand the effect this has on the justice system. Scottsboro Boys court, is another example of this. The Westminster’s officer trial and the Bass Pro trial shows how equality has changed

pessimistic, one gives hope. The following essay will explain more about differences of fantasy world in the two stories. How a fantasy world reflects psychological feeling inside our mind. First of all, fantasy world can help to escape from reality. But how? As the fantasy world is only an imaginary, we can fulfill all our wants there. Everything are under our own controls. Therefore, when things goes wrong in reality, our fantasy world can help us to escape form it. Although we hope to use the fantasy to

The Glass Menagerie, by Tennessee Williams, tells the story of how the standards of society influence two siblings. Tom and Laura Wingfield are two miserable people who no matter how hard they try, cannot seem to fit in. The play takes place in St. Louis, 1937, in which men and women have specific roles and expectations. Men are expected to have jobs, get married and provide for their family. Women are expected to get married, have babies and stay home to raise their children. However, in The Glass

Coincidentally White As Reconstruction drew to a close in early 1877, a national debate about the proper selection of jury pools came to the forefront. Two major Supreme Court cases highlight this debate: Virginia v. Rives and Ex Parte Virginia, both of which stemmed from the killing of Aaron Shelton in Patrick County, Virginia. Following a seemingly unjust verdict given by an all-white jury pool in the murder trial, the defense attorneys petitioned a federal district judge, Alexander Rives. Rives

family, in the name of God, do your duty” (Lee, Chapter 20). Jury selections were previously one-sided situations that were later proven unethical. Racism was common during the 1930s and was often evident in jury selection. The outcomes of trials during those times were were often determined based upon the victim’s testimony. At that time juries mainly consisted of all white jurors. African Americans were infrequently selected to be in the jury, violating their fourteenth amendment rights. Another

challenges still exist. One of these is a proper trial that is both unbiased and without error. The setting for a proper trial includes an impartial jury selection to follow the proper procedures of the courtroom. Selection of the jury is an important task and serving on a jury is considered by the United States as the civic duty of the community. The jury selection process is very important because of the specific allowances, which are given to each courtroom. One of the permissions is the right of

community surrounding him; In past trials when it was a black man put against a white man the white man always won and quickly, however, others may argue he “had it coming” because he pitied Mayella Ewell. In the past, it never took much time for a jury to come to a decision when it was a black man vs. a white man. In chapter 23 after the trial had happened and Tom was found guilty Jem and Atticus have this conversation, “Tom's jury sho’ made up its mind in a hurry,’ Jem shuddered. Atticus's fingers went

Has the jury system outlived its usefulness and practicality? It is a hotly-debated topic that often divides opinion. Although there are many benefits to the jury system, like the ability for citizens to study law while engaging in real-life experiences and reducing the probability of corruption. But undoubtedly, the disadvantages of the jury system outweigh the advantages. Generally, the cons can be listed as the following: first, the lack of expertise characteristic, second, the presence of deadlocks

The dismissal of the jury before the testimony of Carolyn Bryant is one example of how it wasn’t relevant. In MT55, the Judge states, ““It is not immediately relevant to this case and may prejudice the jury’s deliberations.”” (Crowe 184). This quote states that the incident

Most are under the impression that all juries are chosen at random and are unbiased, however, this could not be more untrue. The results of court cases are still affected, if not determined, by bias. The novel, To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee, highlights the difficulties faced by a black man, Tom Robinson, when trying to defend himself to a white jury. Harper Lee also called attention to the inequalities in court with Mayella and her testimony as a white, impoverished, female and the struggles

Jury service is necessary for our society to function because it’s an opportunity to reflect on our shared constitutional values. Jury duty is an obligation of citizenship just like paying your taxes or voting. You are invited to participate and be involved in the most personal, and tragic events in the community. A jury decides whether a person lives or dies or whether a company goes bankrupt. “It may well be the closest you ever come to the Constitution- not just exercising a right it gives you

The jury system is unique for it being the only form of civic participation in delivering justice in criminal trials. The main idea behind still conducting jury trials in many countries is the public trust that a trial by jury is fairer than being tried by a judge and that juries produce better justice. Juries are ideally made up of community members of all different occupations, age, education level, gender, race, culture and sexuality. This can lead to a decision that encompasses the views and

partially due to the fact that juries consisted of white men. In the award winning novel To Kill a Mockingbird, Tom Robinson is incapable of committing the crime he was accused of, but he is found guilty. The trial of Ed Johnson in 1906 and the trial of Lena Baker in 1945 are also examples of innocent black Americans being sentenced to death for their wrongful accusations. Ed Johnson was a black American citizen from Tennessee. In 1906, he was accused of raping a white woman.

misdemeanor supplying false information resulted in 2 Is it Preferable to be a Pretty White Girl if You Are Locked Up in America? One group that benefits disproportionately from the justice system is attractive white women. After a lot of media attention, this is especially true. Research (Skop & Lyons, 2010) her conviction; two were eventually dropped, but she still faced the death penalty. However, the jury was not convinced she was the killer (Strickland, 2020). This mishap emphasizes the need

resulting in an all white jury. Batson claimed that the removal of the black jurors violated his right to a fair trail under the Equal Protection Clause. He was subsequently convicted on all charges by the State of Kentucky (Findlaw | Cases and Codes, n.d.). Facts surrounding the case The case of Batson v. Kentucky was a case about an African American man found guilty of burglary. The jury for his case was all white. He subsequently appealed his conviction based on an all white jury. The judge

Jury nullification occurs when a jury returns a verdict of "Not Guilty" despite its belief that the defendant is guilty of the violation charged, according to Doug Linder. The jury will nullify a law because it believes that it wrongly applies to the particular defendant. Is this right or wrong? Should a jury have the right to override the law? Juries have the power to nullify a law, but do they have the right to? In the 20th century all white juries acquitted white defendants who were blamed for

Americans who were left on the jury panel. This procedure shaped an all white jury. Defense counsel opposed this development prior to the

wrongfully accused in the state of Alabama of murdering 10-year-old Mya Morris. Today, he sits within a courtroom awaiting his hearing to begin. Moments pass, and the plaintiff’s lawyer has struck a juror from the jury; this juror is the only African American seated at the mostly Caucasian jury. In response, the judge asks the lawyer to explain why he struck the juror. The lawyer stated that the African American woman was “too vocal about her opinions.” Cassidy let out a long sigh and waited for the