International law Essays

International human rights law (HRL) is applicable during times of peace; and International humanitarian law (IHL) is applicable during time of armed conflict, war, and occupation. These two laws are founded to complete each other and both are part of international law which recognizes relations between states. International human rights law and international humanitarian law are applicable in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, but Israel is trying to evade its responsibility in the application

sound legal justification for the employment of use of force has been a key issue in international law since the days of Grotius and his “Just War” doctrine. Increasing interdependency of states and the authority the United Nations Charter and Security Council results in a complex system of law where the legality of use of force depends as much on defensibility of the act as it does on the rules of international law governing use of force. Moreover, the right of self-defense, along with the principle

Under international law today sovereignty can be defined as “the legal status of a state that is not subject within its territorial jurisdiction to government, foreign state or foreign law other than public international law”. A state furthermore, has jurisdiction over all individuals within its territory. However, in certain instances it will not exercise this jurisdiction. There is no clear indication of what defined territory is, but a provision was laid down in case law. In the North Sea Continental

Introduction According to Bledsoe and Bozcek in their book, the International Law Dictionary, state jurisdiction is the capacity of a State under International Law to prescribe and enforce the rules of law. It is derived from the State sovereignty and constitutes its vital and central feature. In other words Jurisdiction is the authority state has over individuals, property and actions which happen within its sovereign territorial area (whether it is its land, its national airspace, its internal

International laws are, by definition “A body of rules established by custom or treaty and recognized by nations as binding in their relations with one another” (www.oxforddictionaries.com). International law is a very significant topic because it affects everyone globally. In this research report, I would like to explore the advantages and disadvantages of international laws and consider if they should be enforced in all countries. The modern system we use today was developed in the 17th century

Without the rule of law, impunity reigns. In order that, by punishing violations of international legal norms and by promoting adherence to these norms, the ICC and the Rome Statute system play vital role in advancing the rule of law, thereby reducing impunity. Rome Statute concerns norms aimed at preventing crimes which threaten the peace, security and well-being of the world. The acts and omissions which include under its authority are so heinous, so destructive, that every effort towards their

201311475 International Law Ms. Pauline Brillantes AB Political Science TTH: 3:30-5:00 Prelim Thesis Statement: International Law has been the key for the states to maintain peace and order. This has been also used as an essential aspect of international relations. However, the aggressive war between different states and nations has an effect on the imposition of international law. The United Nation has a role in addressing issues on international law about global, economic and social

Law’s application ICJ decides based on the most relevant applicable law which consists of the provision of UN charter that related to the threat of nuclear weapon, the principle and rules of international humanitarian law, law of neutrality, and other relevant treaties on nuclear weapon. UN charter Article 2(4) for generally prohibits the threat and use of force whether it would be directed against territorial or political independence of states, it is known as unlawful aggression; the complementary

TRUE SENSE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW: The controversy whether international law is a law or not resolves on the divergent definitions of the word “law” given by the jurist. If we subscribe to the view of Hobbes, Austin and Pufendorf, that law is a command of sovereign enforced by a superior political authority then international law cannot be included in the category of law. On the other hand if, we subscribe to the view that the term“law”cannot be limited to rules enacted by superior political authority

The current international scenario is dynamic in nature, full of interstate interactions and full of subjects (if you can call them subjects under traditional international law) that are not states. After the Peace of Westphalia —and even prior to that— the “sovereignty” of states has been the driving force of most international relations; consequently, the states were considered to be the only subjects of intentional law disregarding individuals as subjects of international law. Another major issue

seen various international laws emerging in the international world of politics. Originally, International Laws are shaped by group of kingdoms or states through treaties which commonly contains temporary ceasefires and to not so less extent trade conducts. In this day and age though, international laws are instigated from several International Institutions (i.e.: United Nations) which addresses issues ranging from territorial borders to human rights violations. Numerous international laws in the modern

Criminal law prohibits and punishes the behaviors judged to be antisocial. Because each country’s laws are a mirror image of its values, there are often large differences among the national laws of different countries. Both with regard to the nature of the crimes themselves and the penalties considered suitable. The term ‘international criminal law’ refers variously to at least 3 different areas such as cooperation between diverse national legal systems through extradition and other types of mutual

significant impact post World War 2; shaping the modern world. It had an enormous personal impact on victims and an international impact on the law, A range of evidence powerfully constructs the disastrous effect it had. The assessment of the Holocaust's impact was enormously influential to the modern world. The Holocaust gave rise to the recognition of the genocide and greatly impacted international law’s association with it. Lemkin argues that the introduction of the word “genocide” will demonstrate the

The Journal, “Feminists of International Law and Their Critics”, by Hilary Charlesworth seeks to address the relationship of women and international human rights law. This journal also tell about feminist critiques of International law. This Journal consists of four parts which are the first part is about Feminist Criticism of International law that in this part according to feminist analysis of International law has divided in to two major roles which are deconstructive and reconstructive. Second

effectiveness of humanitarian intervention has been the subject of international discussion. (Thakur 2006). In this case study I will assessing the effectiveness humanitarian intervention during the 1994 Rwandan Genocide. From April to June, Hutu extremists killed 800, 000 to one million Tutsi civilians and Hutu moderates. I will do this by examining the humanitarian intervention provided by the United States and Belgian forces, the International Committee of the Red Cross and

ISSUES IN DEFORESTATION AND DESERTIFICATION Introduction Deforestation is a conventional environmental challenge substantially affecting the resilience and distribution of forests across different boundaries. It’s simply defined as the loss of tree cover usually as a result of forests being cleared for alternative land uses (Gorte and Sheikh, 2010). In the past, the world has experienced unprecedented loss of its forests especially in tropical areas, though the observation on a global scale shows

Thomas Hobbes a 17th century philosopher who is best known for his political philosophy. The idea that nature is competitive, where morality only appears when we enter into society and it is backed up by the power of the sovereign. Hobbes define human nature as sensational because sensation is the source of all of our thoughts. We seek out pleasant experience and we avoid unpleasant experiences. For example death is an unpleasant experience where people are fearful losing their lives. There is also

The nature of conformity and individualism in Fahrenheit 451 is different compared to each other. Conformity is how everyone is in the novel while individualism is only shown outside of society. The true nature of conformity is that everyone is created equally while individualism shows what a real person is. In the novel, Montag was a character that was affected by conformity and individualism since he was once conformed in society, but then soon became an individual himself. Conformity and Individualism

article by Zewi talks about how Chinas belief in Confucianism effected the way it interacted with the Western nations. How western international law forced China to modernize. This article also goes in to further explanation on how the nation of China had to do to force itself to understand and appreciate the way the modern international relations and international laws is conducted in today’s world. Some of the events that forced china to accept this was the opium wars which China was defeated by

In the early years of the twenty-first century, this theoretical rejection of theprescriptive fantastic of international law regarded to be borne out in exercise as anumber of states, groups and humans became engaged in internationally‘unlawful’ action except even the far flung possibility that their habits may want to bechecked through the international legal system. Whatever the criminal deserves of the US-ledinvasion of Iraq or the Israeli invasion of Lebanon, or the detention of terroristsuspects