Oleanna Essays

When I look at the Freud’s reading Some Character Types Met with in Psycho-Analytic Work, I get the solution that psycho-analytic work furnished up with the theory of people become ill of a neurosis in consequence of frustration with a real satisfaction. After comparing Freud’s text with Shakespeare’s Macbeth, I can easily say that the thesis of neurosis can be generated when a conflict occurs between a person’s libidinal wishes and his ‘ego’ is verified with the lead female character Lady Macbeth

1. When analyzing a drama, it’s often best practice to break down the play into units. For each act, identify a few key moments that are essential to the story. Oleanna, written by David Mamet, is a play that looks at a conflict between a university professor, John, and his student, Carol, who makes accusations against him. The only two characters in the play – Carol and John – are both very dynamic as they differentiate more and more from their initial character between the three acts. In Act

Oleanna is a play by David Mamet. Only two characters entertain the audience, John, a married college teacher in his forties, and Carol, a twenty-year-old student. Carol drops by unexpectedly in John’s office, presumably to talk to him about her difficulties to understand the course. John appears to be impatient, as telephone calls repeatedly interrupt their conversation. Carol interferes in his conversation with his wife and asks him personal questions about his calls. John tries to avoid the subject

One of the most controversial plays of the 1990s, Oleanna induced aggressive debates about sexual harassment and gender politics. This play, written during the Anita Hill-Clarence Thomas sexual harassment misconduct is about a female student accusing her male professor of sexual offense. Oleanna, an influential two-character dramatization by David Mamet, investigates the danger of miscommunication and extreme political rightness. It is a play about scholastic governmental issues, educator connections

each individual person. It is unlikely that two people have the same definition of this word. Power can be considered a struggle between genders due to the fact that one wants to have more control and more authority over the other. In the play Oleanna, any reader would quickly realize that power is definitely an issue between John and Carol. Both of these individuals, at some part of the play, want to have complete power over the other, however, this is

In Strindberg’s Miss Julia and Mamet’s Oleanna, readers are able to conclude that the battle between John and Miss Julia and John and Carol are similar. In Miss Julia, Julia is portrayed as a fragile woman who allow Jean, a heartless man leads her into her downfall—her death. On the other hand, in Oleanna, John, the professor is forced to live nightmare because of Carol, his student. This similarity allows the readers to realize that in life, history repeats itself; this includes personal and professional

In the academic world, it is common sense for teachers and students to have mutual respect and communicate clearly. The play Oleanna play by David Mamet demonstrates the fight for power between a professor and a student. After analyzing the play it is hard to take sides with the characters since both of them have deceitful personalities; however, John does not deserve to be accused of rape because the rape charges are a product of Carol’s imagination. From the beginning John is trying to emphasis

‘Are we bound by it?’: Language and Gendered representations of power in Oleanna The world chronicled in David Mamet’s Oleanna is entirely disparate from the utopian paradise that Pete Seeger croons about in his song. Here, every use of language is charged with assumptions of power and gender that Mamet seeks to explore and critique. This review, using the film as a template seeks to investigate the way in which use of and access to language invests the individual with a certain semblance of power

In the play Oleanna written by highly esteemed playwright, David Mamet, there is an ongoing dissension between main characters John and Carol. John is Carol’s professor at a highly revered college and Carol comes to John crying out for help to pass his course. Carol goes ballistic in John’s office so John tries to comfort her and offers her a compromise in order to get her grade up, which would involve them meeting a couple times in his office. Carol perceives John’s words and actions the wrong

In his article, “Mamet’s Oleanna in Context: Performance, Personal, Pedagogy,” (2005) Lee Papa asserts that the violent end of the last act makes “a phallocentric revenge fantasy” of Mamet’s play; “The increasing violation of Carol’s personal space by John—the comforting arm, the

Mamet opens Oleanna with Carol being a seemingly submissive student searching for help from her dominant male teacher, John. Primarily, their relationship seems to be aligned with the societal norms during that time period (i.e. the twentieth century) where the woman

After I have read the Poisonwood Bible by Barbara Kingsolver. I realized that there were multiple different symbols that helped convey complex ideas. For me I have found that in the Novel there are three important symbols that help shape the plot of the story and these are Methuselah the Parrot, Palindromes: Which is Ada’s journal, and lastly the green Mamba snake that killed Ruth May. The significance about all of these symbols is that they tend to add a meaning and depth to the story. After all

between what is right and what is wrong. Given any circumstance, temptation would evolve in the mind. Those temptations would not define who you are, but your reactions to it would! As Carol, the students state to John, her professor in the play Oleanna, “You have an agenda, we have an agenda. I am not interested in your feelings or your motivation, but your actions” (Act III, p.74). Those actions do not take into consideration temptation. Subjects to temptation defines a misleading character; therefore