State court Essays

The States Courts would likely hear case (a) and the Federal Courts would likely hear case (c). Sometimes, the jurisdiction of state courts will overlap with that of federal courts, meaning that some cases can be brought in both courts. With that being said, both cases (b) and (d) are prime examples of the overlap. With cases (b) and (d) being able to go to either to state or federal courts, we then need to find the determining factors to what court would be the proper one for the cases. For instance

I began by examining the structure of each state 's court system as outlined by their respective website. I began in Wisconsin where the lowest courts are municipal courts. Wisconsin has 237 municipal courts staffed by 240 municipal judges. The largest municipal court is in Milwaukee and is staffed by three full time judges and hears more than 110,000 cases yearly. Municipal courts hear cases from a wide variety of cases, including traffic, parking, building code violations, trespassing, health

enforce laws to protect our society. The court systems have been deliberating on a wide range of issues and delivering justice in accordance to the law without fear or favor. There are two judicial systems, the federal courts and state courts. Each of these has jurisdictions on the kind or type of cases they can and should liberate on all under the Nation’s constitution. State courts have cases which violate state laws created by state officers while federal courts deal with violations of laws created

Article III of the United States Constitution, it states “The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behavior, and shall, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office.” This means that Supreme Court Justices are allowed to hold

Supreme Court cases can shape our national laws; it can shape an American citizen’s future. Without them, the Bill of Rights could be left up for our own interpretation. This could cause unfair laws and create havoc. In 1966, a court case named Kent vs United Sates took place. This case could create the ability to shape a juvenile's life forever. The court case, Kent vs. United States took place in 1966. This case was about Morris Kent, a 16-year-old boy who had been on probation since he was

State v. Hendrix A Supreme Court case where the defendant Homer O. Hendrix was convicted and found guilty of voluntary manslaughter. Hendrix was sentenced to a term of 15 years in prison. The events leading up to the Supreme Court’s ruling takes place take place 3 years earlier. Labor Day, September 1, 1975, Hendrix and another member of the community Norman D. Cherry got into a confrontation on Hendrix’s property. Hendrix and his family were at an outing on the shore Lake Murray which was located

Kent v. United States Juveniles… not old enough to vote, drive, buy/use alcohol, enter casinos, or even see a rated “R” movie legally. So, then what makes them eligible to be tried as adults in the court of law? A common sense decision to enforce more mature behavior, or a glaring flaw in the system that causes more conflict than solution? There are many opinions on how juvenile court decisions should be handled in our judicial system today. The verdicts of numerous trials in the 60’s , including

organization of Federal and State governmental divisions establishes the US Legal System. Every state has its own court system, plus the federal government one, fifty-two in total. Each state has its own constitution, governmental structure, legal codes and judiciary system. The structural system of the State Courts changes depending on the state and every State Court has its own characteristics, even though in some cases they are the same. One judge presides in most of the state courts of limited jurisdiction

In the United States, the Constitution is the supreme law of the land. Within the Constitution, a federal system of government has been created where power is shared between the federal and state governments in which both have their own court systems as well as laws (Gluck, 2014). The constitution created two parallel criminal justice systems which add a complexity to the system as a whole (Neubauer & Fradella, 2014). Although it may appear there are two separate court systems, there is actually

Constitution grants the Supreme Court the power to review cases and declare a verdict. However, the Supreme Court is only allowed to make a decision regarding a case if and only it is brought to them. In other words, only cases that has been passed through the lower courts and has made its way up into the Supreme Court is the Supreme Court allowed to make a decision. From the founding of the constitution, many cases have made its way up the courts and into the Supreme Court where the Justices deliver

Michael Morton V. State of Texas In 1986, Michael Morton was having a normal life, he had a wife, a kid, and a job. That same year his life change completely. Michael Morton was doing his daily routine, as in going to his job, coming back to his wife, and kid. When he came back from his job, he found his wife murdered in their bed. He was wrongfully convicted of the murder with enough evidence showing his innocence. After spending nearly 25 years in prison for a conviction that he didn’t commit.

The court case of State of Nebraska v. Gary E. Heitman deals with the conviction of Heitman on charges of criminal conspiracy to commit first degree sexual assault on a minor. “Heitman contends that the evidence was insufficient to convict and that he was entrapped” (Heitman p.1) while the court concluded that “there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction” (Heitman p.1) and “further determined that the district court was not clearly wrong in finding that Heitman was predisposed to commit

United States v. Lopez was the first United States Supreme Court case since the New Deal to set limits to Congress's power under the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. The issue of the case was that It exceeded to the power of Congress which had no say over it because the case had nothing to do with commerce or any sort of economic activity. The case United States v. Lopez involved Alfonzo Lopez Jr., Supreme Court Justice William H. Rehnquist, and Congress. Unites States v. Lopez

Court Systems: Comparing Canada, the United States, and Mexico This paper is a discussion of the court systems of Canada, the United States, and Mexico. The aim of the paper is to point highlight similarities and differences in each judicial system. It will allow the reader an insight to the how each country operates its judicial branch. When considering the court systems between the Canada, United States, and Mexico, one must look further than courts themselves, at the Constitutions of the three

Welsh vs. United States The Supreme Court case I will be writing about is Welsh vs. United States. Elliot Ashton Welsh II was directed by Selective Service to go to physical examination on March 27, 1964. Welsh filed a conscientious objector status form which meant he was requesting to be exempt from the war. On the form, he crossed out the words, “my religious training and,” making the statement state, “by reason of ---- belief, consequently opposed to participation in war in any form,” then he

The American court system does not function as a single entity that adjudicates all claims presented before it but as divided courts representing the individual fifty state governments and one the central federal government in a judicial federalism structure. The United States Constitution binds the federal government as it examines the cases before it, and each state government is obligated to its state constitution when rendering decisions. Claims that can originate in either or both systems further

Prize Cases 1862, Ex parte Merryman 1861, Ex parte Milligan 1866, Korematsu v. United States 1944, Youngstown Sheet and Tube v. Sawyer 1952, Rasul v Bush/ Handi v. Rumsfeld 2004, Bands of State of Washington v. United States 1929, Train v. City of New York 1975, Clinton v. City of New York 1998, United States v. Nixon 1974, Nixon v. Fitzgerald 1982, Clinton v. Jones 1997, Myers v. United States 1926 are Supreme Court cases that were fought to control the power of the president. Even the most influential

This paper will compare the court systems of the United States and Spain which will explore the differences and similarities of the respective nations legal systems, Supreme Courts, and other aspects as it relates to the comparison of the these two nations judiciaries. Spain’s legal system is based in the civil law tradition in which its roots come from the law of Ancient Rome known as Roman law, in fact Spain was one of the first nations in Europe to apply civil law as the basis of its legal system

Katz v. United States, is a United States Supreme Court case discussing about "right to privacy" and the legal definition of a "search". Charles Katz lived in Los Angeles and in 1960’s he was the leading basketball handicappers in the country. Charles Katz used a public telephone in Los Angeles, California to place illegal gambling bets with gamblers in Miami and Boston. The FBI tapped the specific phone by attaching an electronic listening and recording device to the outside of the public telephone

Citation. 555 US _ (2008) DOCKET NO. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit . BRIEF FACT OF SAMMARY : Michael Pulido was convicted of first-degree murder in a California state court for his involvement in the shooting of a gas station attendant during the course of a robbery. He claimed that he was only involved in the robbery after the shooting had taken place. FACTS : On appeal day Mr. Pulido explained to the jury that the instructions were a maitake and allowed a jury to convict