Stone sculpture Essays

Michelangelo crafted his first sculpture when he was a teenager. One of these sculptures is the Battle of the Centaurs. The Battle of the Centaurs is a sculpted piece with the pool of male soldiers, three dimensionally carved into a stone. The images are layered randomly in a very precise way. This sculpture was a stepping stone for Michelangelo’s career as an artist. It really displayed young Michelangelo's talent and it showed his weird interest in the nude of the human body. He also sculpted other

The stone sculpture, titled Garland Sarcophagus made by a Roman artist, this piece is created in the year AD 200-225. The Garland Sarcophagus stone sculpture is a coffin for inhumation burials of upper class, the physical condition of the sculpture is cleaned and restored. This sculpture is made in Rome, and belonged to the Roman Empire movement. The Garland Sarcophagus is not typical work, due to inhumation burials being an uncommon Roman practice during the second century A.D., until around the

and contrast of two sculptures derived from the ancient times i.e. the statue of Memi and Sabu and the statue of Gudea. Sculptures were considered to be a unique way of expressing for the artist. In this piece one is able to reminisce on the cultures, history, visons and practices of persons from the ancient times. The sculptures were important to the people because it helped tell stories along with all their accomplishments in that era. According to Rogers, L (n.d), Sculptures, an artistic form in

attending Indiana State University, one of the first sculptures I took an interest in was the Via Solaris. “Via Solaris” is Latin for “the way or road of the sun.” The sculpture is about 20-feet tall and made of bronze and steel. Via Solaris was created by John Van Alstine, an American sculptor living and working in New York State. John Van Alstine is best known for stone and metal abstract sculptures illustrating remarkable balance and elegance. The sculpture is located on the north side of Stalker Hall

For my museum report, I made a decision to work on a Kouros who was found within the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City. A Kouros could be a Greek sculpture of a young male. The peak of the sculpture was 6 '4  tall. Whereas, perceptive this piece I found that it had been created out of tan coloured marble with a touch of bronze, and fully naked from head to toe. His arms area unit tightly by his sides with holes in between his sides, however his fists area unit closed, and connected to

King Khafre sculpture shows a lot of symbols that represented him as person and a king. Yes, he is seen as a very strong person because he is molded to the stone which made him seem very powerful, but his arms are very relaxed. So the relaxed arms also show that he is a very patient man and listens to his people. With one arm holding a spear to represent power in control and the other hand that shows that he is very calm. Which also shows that he is a very forgiving person. Even though this is

Pharaohs. Both pieces are sculptures in the round, meaning they are not carved into a wall; they are freestanding. Both of the kings

probably made between 24,000 and 22,000 BCE.The sculptor may have created it to symbolize the importance of the role women played in societies, or it could have been a symbol of fertility or possibly a doll. The sculpture is of a naked, obese woman with no feet but mostly a full body sculpture. The breasts, the stomach and overall body is enlarged. The belly button is prominent There are folds of fat under the arms and on the buttocks. It may depict pregnancy or was she just fat?, the thin arms and

Using specific examples, compare the way gods and people were depicted in the sculptures of ancient India and Greece, noting similarities and differences. “The story of Indian art and sculpture dates back to the Indus valley civilization of the 2nd and 3rd millennium BC. Tiny terra-cotta seals discovered from the valley reveal carvings of peepal leaves, deities and animals. These elemental shapes of stones or seals were enshrined and worshipped by the people of the civilization. Two other objects

ways in which they are similar. Both works are statues of stone, and both are ancient in age. Both statues are of similar size. Beyond that, there is very little about them that strikes me as similar. In contrasting them, it is easy to list their differences. Gudea is from the Neo-Sumerian period in the region of Mesopotamia, while The Royals is from the Old Kingdom in the Egyptian region. Gudea is made from diorite, a dark, hard stone. The Royals is carved from limestone, with paint, an off-white

1.) The bronze sculpture of David by Donatello is about 5' 2 1/4. Donatello is located in Museo Nazionale del Barello, Florence Italy. Donatello was made by various media from a lost-wax casting into bronze to carved marble and a polychrome wood. The marble sculpture of David by Michelangelo it about 17 feet tall that in not including his pedestal. Michelangelo is located in Galleria Dell' Academia located in Florence Italy. The Michelangelo's David is made of twenty colossal marble, each weighing

gesso, and polychrome sculpture features the bodhisattva Guanyin resting atop a large stone pedestal. The statue expresses the story of Guanyin as well emphasize the religious, symbolic interaction between the viewer and the subject in regard to specifically how the layers of multiculturalism and religion influenced Chinese society and perspective. Upon viewing, the viewer notices the height, craft, and subject matter of the statue. Being nearly life-size, this sculpture demands the viewer to look

the “Kouros” was chiseled from a rough slab of stone but the viewer is visually deceived when scanning the polished surface of flesh and drapery carved in the “Venus de Milo”.

museum and decided to express my opinion on the statue The Stone of Hope. The stone of hope is a statue of Martin Luther king jr who was an iconic civil rights activist in his time. This statue has many different elements in this “replica” like statue compared to the actual statue in Washington D.C. The medium of this statue is granite and has a certain technique that appears to be a chiseling method. Which the tactile qualities of the sculpture are smooth. I believe this is interesting because the technique

The name of this work is “Akhenaten and His Family.” The sculptor of this work is unknown. But the piece was originally made around 1353-1336 BCE. Provenance (Where was it made? For whom?)—It was made in Ancient Egypt for Akhenaten and his family, in honor and praise of the kings prosporous and happy family life. Location (Where is it now?)—The piece is currently located in Agyptisches Museum. Medium and Technique—The artist sculpted this relief in painted limestone, 12.25 ft long by 15.75 feet

of keenness, war, and shield, and the statue of Zeus the Greek King of all Gods, were Chryselephantine (overlaid with gold and ivory) statues made by the well-known Greek craftsman Phidias. Since both statues were created by the same artist and sculpture they tend to have many similarities and some concrete differences. In this essay I’ll be demonstrating their features and how they differ from each other. Phidias dedicated the Statue of Zeus to him in 435 BCE to pay tribute to the Olympic amusements

hair and the form of the support (the stump) also assist us in dating this piece because they can be linked stylistically to other known objects from specific Roman periods. The Doryphoros and other Roman copies of Greek sculpture are extremely valuable because no bronze sculpture made by a famous Greek artist has survived to the present day. . Roman copies, therefore, provide us with the only visual documentation available of Classical Greek

progressed to show a complex craft construction and manipulation of pure materials in his sculptures. Working with both wood and bronze as well as other pure materials is known to be a mix of minimalistic logic and traditional ways of making such sculptures. His reductive technique and meditative approach challenges the physical and poetic boundaries of materials. A recurring theme that appears within his sculptures is a hollow mass as well as a solid shape with qualities of uncertainty and emptiness

Metropolitan Museum of Art, n.d.). On the other hand, the statues of Gudea were created during the Neo-Sumerian period in ancient Sumer. Gudea was a ruler who constructed temples and other significant buildings in his city-state of Lagash. Gudea’s sculptures were intended to represent himself or the gods and convey religious concepts and ideas. They were designed to

the viewer to touch it. Its intended purpose was likely to depict a husband and wife for the purpose of supplying a "home" for their spirits in the afterlife. From this vessel, the couple could partake of the gifts of food offered to. The lovely sculpture