Transactional leadership Essays

Transactional Leadership and Organizational Change: Literature on leadership shows a progressive model, which starts from focusing on the traits and characteristics of a leader, then focuses on behavior and afterward highlights on the contextualized nature of the leadership. The concept of leadership starts with the unique focus on the theory of “Great Man”. The supporter of the great man theory assumes that leaders are born and have innate qualities; therefore, leaders cannot be made. The word “Man”

Transactional Leadership Style The idea of transactional leadership theory was created in 1978 by J.M. Burns and based on Waber’s (1974) theory of leadership along with Kohlberg’s stage of moral growth (Sciotto, 2014). Transactional leadership style describes more on a “give and take” relationship as referring to the exchange relationship between leader and follower, in order to fit their own self-interests as a consequence of meeting particular objectives (Bass, 1985, 1990; Burns, 1978; Lai, 2011)

Transactional leadership. Transactional leadership is described as managerial leadership because it emphasizes the supervisory role, as well as the organization and group’s performance (Odumeru & Ifeanyi, 2013). Transactional leadership is also described as an exchange of the leader’s interest and followers’ expectations involving commitment, respect, and trust (Paracha, Qamar, Mirza, Hassan, & Waqas, 2012). Transactional leadership has been defined as a leader creating clear structures and rewards

Leadership is an essential task in management (Weihrich, et al., 2008), as it is an important factor that contributes enormously to the over-all wellbeing of the organisations (Odumeru & Ifeanyi, 2013). As stated by Cox (2001), transactional and transformational are two important types of leadership. The differentiation amongst these two types of leadership was initially made by Downton (1973), as cited in (Barnett, et al., 2001), and introduced by Burns (1978) in his descriptive work on political

Leadership can be defined as an interaction process between leaders and their employees, whereby leaders attempt to inspire employees to fulfill shared goals (Northouse, 2010; Yukl, 2005). Leadership style is the manner and method of motivating people, providing direction and achieving goals (Amirul & Daud, 2012). Style can either encourage or discourage employees’, which can in turn lead to increasing or decreasing performance levels (Belonio, 2012). However, leadership has been of interest to many

and transactional leadership. The best way is evaluate of other superior on each theory before the discussion on transformational and transactional leadership. They are two opposites direction when it comes to the underlying theories of leader management. A good leadership has own profile that might include transformational, transactional and non-transactional behavior and motivation but the best leader will apply transformational leadership than transactional

Transactional Leadership Frequently referred to as a managerial approach to leadership, the transactional leadership style is centered on improving efficiencies within an organization or team (McShane & Von Glinow, 2015). Leaders practicing the transactional approach focus on the details of the step by step processes and workflows using a reward and punishment system to encourage workgroup production (Dartey-Baah, 2015). As errors and inconsistent results are part of the expected norm, transactional

The leadership ideas conveyed in the movie, Inception, are shown diversely within the characters, the inception team, and the target organization of their mission. The members of Dominic Cobb’s team implanting the idea into the subject’s mind have designated roles that exemplify many leadership theories and their effects on the team and their task. These characters in the movie, such as Dom, Ariadne, and Saito all influence each other as leaders in their roles and contribute to their task to place

TRANSACTIONAL LEADERSHIP STYLE Transactional theory, as its name implies, involves a “transaction” or quid pro quo between a supervisor and a subordinate. It is important to adopt the appropriate leadership style for assuring the success of organization. Parry & Thomson (2002) stated that in some cases, transformational leadership becomes inapplicable to ensure subordinate’s honesty from examining and appraising by a leader. Then the leader can practiced transactional style of leadership. Literally

• TRANSACTIONAL LEADERSHIP Previously the leaders were more considered as transactional leaders. Transactional leader means that the leaders who use rewards or exchanges to motivate the employees for achieving the set goals (Robbins, Coulter, & Vohra, 2010). According to Kuhnert (1994) Transactional leadership differs from transformational leadership because the transactional leader does not focuses on the individuals concerns or their personal grooming but exchange things with their subordinates

recent time attitudes toward leadership have changed alot, In the wider sense the word, a "leader" is who have the ability to influence others towards vision and its achievement or setting of comman goals. Telling other what do to can be done by anyone, but leadership needed very much more than that skills to giving task resposibility to others. However techincal skill and IQ are not irrelevant they do matters, but emotional intelligence is an essential element of leadership. No one can become a great

Introduction Leadership as defined by Northhouse (2007;3), is a process whereby an individual influences a group of individuals to achieve a common goal. In organizations, the success of the organization is determined by the ability of individuals to realize and have the same direction in following this common goal usually due to influence. Because of such, a number of leadership theories have been propounded over the years which have sought explore different dimensions of leadership in trying to

Leadership in Policing Jana Boudreaux Southern University at New Orleans   Abstract Leadership is a force that helps the followers to change their minds, attitude and personality; therefore, effective leadership is important to implement changes in a positive manner. Transactional leadership is typically considered a transaction between the leader and a follower. Authoritarian style of leadership is usually followed in the police department. This style of leadership portrays a very clear divide

Transactional and Transformational Leadership Both concepts of the theory are built upon the reciprocity relationship between leader and follower. In contrast to the transactional leader who practices depending reinforcement of followers, the transformational leader inspires, intellectually stimulates, and individually considerate their team (Bass, 1999). At the core of transformational approach it is emphasize the both on leader ability to motivate and empower follower as well as in the moral

Transactional leadership General Schwarzkopf was commander-in-chief of the U.S. forces in Operation Desert Storm, responsible for tens of thousands of troops in Iraq and Kuwait. He used the rules and regulations of the military to coordinate operations on several continents. Vince Lombardi is best known as the coach for the Green Bay Packers. Under his leadership, the team never had a losing session. He used to run the Packers through the same plays in practice over and over again. These two examples

As of today I am consider as a transactional and a transformational leader because in work I just go to work and make money do what I have to do, but there are sometimes that I must go above and beyond so that our clients that hired us will be satisfied with the work. Same goes for school but I am more of a transformational leader because I do my school work like everyone else, yet I give my time to help my classmates to understand material or I include more things in my work than others. This is

The concept of transactional leadership seems to have its origins in the work of Downtown (1973) when he contrasted transactional from transformational leadership to account for differences between revolutionary, rebel, reform, and ordinary leaders (Bass & Avolio, 1990; Leithwood et al., 1996; Silins, 1994). However, systematic research into the nature and effects on transactional leadership in different work organizations seems to have taken firm roots following the work of Burns (1978), who distinguished

INTRODUCTION: Putting patients at the heart of healthcare processes and procedures is the key driver to quality of care as it enables a better emphasis on the care practice from identification, and throughout all approaches leading to healthy lifestyle maintenance (Antwi & Mryanka 2014). Nursing performances in the current healthcare systems are therefore, focused on care quality which is mostly determined through patients’ conditions, as well as the attainment of structural objectives (Bakker et

Transactional Leadership is based on the principles of the social exchange theory, in which an individual would expect to give and receive benefits or rewards when engaging in a social interaction (Sullivan, 2012). The interaction will cease if one or both person decides that the exchange of benefits and rewards are no longer worthwhile. Transactional Leadership theory also focus on the task that need to be carried out and makes sure they are done the right way as compared to Transformational Leadership

It is evident that goal setting and patient-centred practice are concepts that have increasingly dominated discourse in stroke rehabilitation (Levack et al., 2011). Goal setting has fundamentally been considered a key component in current rehabilitation and is described as ‘the essence’ of effective stroke rehabilitation (Barnes and Ward, 2000, p. 8). However despite this, there is a demand for critical inquiry into the process of goal setting and the determination of outcome relative to goals in