United States Court of Claims Essays

she was not being the same wage as a male for performing the same duties. Additionally this study will determine if the plaintiff established a valid prima facie as well as if there was a basis for equal work. Next, what factors did the appeals court base its decision and why is the other-than-sex factor that is presented by the employer insufficient to avoid a trial? Finally, what should the employer have done differently to ensure this type of situation did not occur in their business? Legal

The first documented use of School uniforms was in England in 1222. Ever since then uniforms have been growing in popularity. In the United States, a movement toward using uniforms in state schools began when Bill Clinton addressed it in the 1996 State of the Union, Today, 16.5% of public schools in the US require students to wear uniforms, and 54% enforce a strict dress code (Peter Caruso). Although school uniforms take away the ability of self expression, students should be required to wear school

sacred to the Lakota Sioux for many reasons. First and foremost, their creation myth is based in the Black Hills of South Dakota and Wyoming. Wind Cave is located in the Southern Black Hills and plays an important role in their creation myth. Ostler states that the Lakota believe that the “first people [and the buffalo] originated within the earth and came through Wind Cave’s opening.” . The Great Father blessed them with the land. In the book, Lakota Portraits: Lives of the Legendary Plains People

LEXIS 155988 the court where the court finds error in the application of the law the Respondent 's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. It is further as well addressing evidence rule 405 the order of that Petitioner 's application for federal writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and this case is DISMISSED. It is further as well the ordered that Petitioner 's Motion for Evidentiary Hearing is DENIED. It is further any motions not previously ruled upon by the Court are DENIED. The court found that originally

after the Supreme Court case Roe v Wade ruled that women should have the option to have an abortion under the Due Process Clause within the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution. Even after the ruling, conversations surrounding abortion continue to bring new information and thoughts to the issue. On a basic level, it is a fight between people who are pro-life or pro-choice. The fight extends from teenagers and parents to doctors, lawyers, lawmakers and even United States representatives

On August 8, 2009, Sonia Maria Sotomayor became the first justice of Hispanic descent to be seated on the United States Supreme Court. Her upbringing in a Puerto Rican household in the Bronx, significantly shaped her decision making first on the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (1991-1997) and later, on the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1997 - 2009). Today, Sotomayor continually advocates for the basic rights of Americans; this is demonstrated

Supreme Court ruling that overturned a Texas interpretation of abortion law and made abortion legal in the United States. The Roe v. Wade decision held that a woman, with her doctor, has the right to choose abortion in earlier months of pregnancy without legal restriction, and with restrictions in later months, based on the right to privacy. As a result, all state laws that limited women 's access to abortions during the first trimester of pregnancy were invalidated by this particular case. State laws

requiring an individual to appear in court and to give testimony or to bring material to be used as evidence. Some subpoenas mandate that book, papers, and other items be surrendered to the court" (Schmalleger 301). A court, Grand Jury, legislative body, or Administrative Agency uses a subpoena to compel an individual to appear before it at a specific time to give testimony. An individual who receives a subpoena but fails to appear may be charged with contempt of court and subjected to civil or criminal

was to claim that she had been raped because it was illegal to have an abortion for any other reason. The problem was she had not been raped and the unauthorized facility had been closed done by police. This lead to her to seek the help of Linda coffee and Sarah Wedington, two attorneys who would argue the case. In June of 1970 under the alias Jane roe the two attorneys presented her case to h supreme court. The defendant in the case was Dallas county districted attorney henry wade. The court didn’t

The Rhetorical Strategies of a Latina Judge's Speech To End the Lack of Representation Throughout the diversity in the United States, there is a multitude of factors that underestimate and terminate the presence or idea of women and minorities in government roles. In current times, awareness of gender equality and excluded minorities has rose to an all- time high. Many are advocating that the way our country sees and treats intersectionality needs to change for the better. Judge Sonia Sotomayor

The discovery rules are a set of laws that are used in many states in the United States. There are many rules that are a part of the discovery laws. Procedural rules 11 and 14 are two important laws that make up the discovery rules. Procedural Rule 11 looks into pretrial conference and pretrial hearings. The pre-trial conference first occurs during the arraignment stage in a criminal trial. At the pretrial conference, there is an agenda and a report that is discussed and performed. There are many

or Jane Roe, who claimed that the law violated her Constitutional rights. The lawsuit was filed against District Attorney Henry Wade in a Texas federal court. She also said that she was not wealthy enough to travel out of Texas. The court ruled that the law was unconstitutional. Wade appealed to the supreme court. At this time, most states banned abortions.

v. Wade ruled unconstitutional a state law that banned abortions except to save the life of the mother. In 1973 when this ruling was made, many states restricted and prohibited the practice of abortion. In 1970 "Jane Roe" (Norma McCorvey) filed a lawsuit against the state of Texas which criminalized abortions. Ms Roe claimed the law violated her constitutional right to terminate her pregnancy in a safe environment because she could not afford to travel to a state where it was permitted. Texas ruled

(Not-So-Secret) War on Moms: How the Supreme Court Took Protections Away from Pregnant Workers" by Ariela Migdal, Ariela talks about the Supreme Court's decision 5-4 that an arrangement in the FMLA (Family and Medical Leave Act) giving specialists time off to watch over their own particular genuine wellbeing conditions, including pregnancy and labor, can't be implemented by state representatives in harms claims against their open managers. In Coleman v. Court of Appeals of Maryland unprotected open representatives

(2002). This case provided the courts unequivocal guidance to decide as or not a person was disabled. To start reviewing the case details we need to understand the ADA regulation and how it was used during the case in discussion. The Americans with Disabilities ACT (ADA) was approved by Congress in 1990. This legislation prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities. “The ADA prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in employment, State and local government, public accommodations

1. Introduction Roe v. Wade, the landmark Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion in the United States, has been a hotly contested issue since it was decided in 1973. While the decision was celebrated by advocates of women's rights as a victory for reproductive freedom and bodily autonomy, opponents of the decision have consistently pushed for its reversal. With the appointment of conservative justices to the Supreme Court in recent years, the possibility of overturning Roe v. Wade has become

Alter ego is defined as, “Legal doctrine whereby the court finds a corporation lacks a separate identity from an individual or corporate shareholder, resulting in injustice to the corporation’s debtors. Finding alter ego gives the court cause to pierce the corporate veil and hold individual shareholders personally liable for debts of the corporation” (Alter Ego. LII / Legal Information Institute, n.d.). The case of GRUENDL v. OEWEL PARTNERSHIP INC. the overall partnership of the OPL is OPI and not

think things through properly. Others believe that children ought to be tried as adults at a certain point. The children can no longer be shielded by a lack of understanding and forethought. Violent crimes committed should only be handled in adult court when the child is a teen. Crimes committed have always been an issue. In the late 1980s to 1994, there was an increase in arrests of juvenile offenders (Stimson, Grossman 20-21). One crime that took place during this time was committed by Jacob

Mullins aptly filed charges of discrimination to which the state found merit, and Phillips quickly shot back with appeals of his own, leading us to this current situation. Now, after having been argued in front of the Supreme Court, the case lies in dormancy, waiting for its verdict come spring. During its time in the public eye, this case has been a hot button topic for many wanting to chime in with their opinion across the United States. Some cry that discriminating based on sexual orientation is

Polygraph 1 THE POLYGRAPH MACHINE: Tried and True or Witch?s Brew Sharon Robinson Bailiff, Duval County Sheriff?s Office Florida Gulf Coast University Polygraph 2 First and foremost, I state my uncompromising objection to the use of the polygraph by the Florida Court System. The history of the polygraph initially referred to as a lie detector. In 1914 and 1915 Vittori Benussi and William Morston produced a device that was supposedly capable of detecting if a person was being