Utilitarianism Essays

Sort By:
  • Good Essays

    Types Of Utilitarianism

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages

    ethical theory utilitarianism, more specifically rule utilitarianism. In this essay, I will explain what rule utilitarianism is and two of its types. I will discuss situations where rule utilitarianism can be looked at as somewhat morally wrong , to show an objection on the theory. I will give an objection to how the general guiding rules are made and also to give an analytical view on the principle of utility. Utilitarianism is a popular type of consequentialism, rule utilitarianism is a form of

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1.Utilitarianism decides what is morally right and wrong based off the amount happiness a decision creates compared to the unhappiness is caused by the decision. So if a majority of people would benefit and a minority would not then the decision is still morally right. Utilitarianism is also based more in facts then divine or religious codes. This does mean that what is and is not morally right can change as more facts are known. 2. The basic theory of utilitarianism is easy to understand. Basically

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Utilitarianism

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages

    experiences. Because of this higher logical ability, we have an obligation to factor the experiences of animals into the calculation of Utilitarianism. For greater clarity, Utilitarianism is the theory that the morally correct action is the one that will result in the greatest amount of pleasure (Mill 1861: pg. 38). Under the philosophical theory of Utilitarianism, human beings have a positive moral obligation toward animals. In Immanuel

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Act Utilitarianism

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    . Utilitarianism Utilitarianism is an ethical framework that leads us to act taking in consideration what is useful, beneficial and make the majority of people happy. It takes in account the consequences of our behavior and not the act or the means by itself. There are two types of Utilitarianism: The Rule-utilitarians and the Act-utilitarian. The Rule-utilitarians stablish that every person should follow rules that have been implemented for the good and happiness of the society. The Act-utilitarians

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    suggested by the instructor about the philosophical idea of Consequentialism (Utilitarianism) given by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill and the other concept which is given by Immanuel Kant in the critics of Utilitarianism theory which is called Deontological Ethics. The reading given made understand about all these two concept and their possible application in the policy or law making like the universal law. Utilitarianism:- this is the concept used by Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) and the John Stuart

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mill's Utilitarianism

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    development may be which makes those best convenient to the best number. People should ask what action may push the best measure about ecstasy to individuals who need help affected. It pushes one's success over others. There exist two sorts of utilitarianism: the ACT and the RULE. The Act Utilitarian expresses that an action is awesome just to the degree that it progresses net, complete, expected utility. Then again, the Rule Utilitarian says that an action is awesome just to the degree that it agrees

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Is Utilitarianism?

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ernazar Kamal Utilitarianism Utilitarianism is an ethical theory, which determines the moral value by its utility. According to utilitarian opinion, the action is morally good, if it brings an overall maximum happiness. In this theory, as in consequentialism, consequence is important, and is some cases only matters. It is believed that one would achieve happiness, when there would be a pleasure and no pain. (John Stuart 2013) However, it is important to understand that utilitarianism considers not

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rule Utilitarianism

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When discussing both act and rule utilitarianism, it is important to understand that both of them agree in terms of the overall consequence of an action, because they emphasize on creating the most beneficial pleasure and happiness in the outcome of an act. Despite this fact, they both have different principles and rules that make them different from each other. Act utilitarianism concentrates on the acts of individuals. Meaning that if a person commits an action, he/she must at least have a positive

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    will explain the moral theory utilitarianism and outline its main claim; then I will present the most serious objection to utilitarianism: that it does not value justice; next, I will present utilitarianism’s refutation to the critique; lastly, I will evaluate utilitarianism’s reply and argue that utilitarianism can sufficiently answer this objection. While there are different schools within utilitarianism I will be focusing on its most common version: act utilitarianism (from this point on I will refer

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Concept of Justice: Utilitarianism Evaluating Justice The actions you decide to take in life have consequences. In an ideal world you will be rewarded for being good, while making bad decisions will be consequences. This is what many fail to realize about legal systems. Many individuals expect to get off easy after committing a crime, when ideally, everyone should be able to distinguish between right and wrong, and understand that there are consequences to unlawful action. Unfortunately many

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Utilitarianism is the moral theory that the action that people should take it the one that provides the greatest utility. In this paper I intend to argue that utilitarianism is generally untenable because act and rule utilitarianism both have objections that prove they cannot fully provide the sure answer on how to make moral decisions and what will be the ultimate outcome. I intend to do this by defining the argument for act and rule utilitarianism, giving an example, presenting the objections to

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism Ethics is False The utilitarian approach to ethics builds on the premise that the end justifies the means. It asserts that social actions such as punishment are ethical as long as they make society a better place. According to utilitarianism, society must take all actions possible to stamp out antisocial acts such as crimes. Hence, a criminal is punished to rid society of his acts. However, in reality, it is almost impossible for society to completely wipe out crime through punishment

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    example that the action is taken, which would kill the least people? Utilitarianisms would answer the question in the affirmative and change the track so only one person has to suffer. However, we have to question if the Utilitarianism is applicable to such ethical questions (Smart & Williams, 1973). This essay will outline several strength and weaknesses of the Utilitarianism devised by Jeremy Bentham. Firstly, the Utilitarianism will be outlined, secondly some strength and weaknesses are explained

    • 1711 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism as Democracy Is utilitarianism the “philosophy of democracy”? In my opinion utilitarianism is the “philosophy of democracy.” Utilitarianism is one of the most powerful and persuasive approaches to normative ethics in the history of philosophy. According to Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, utilitarianism is the ethical doctrine that virtue is based on utility, and that conduct should be directed toward promoting the greatest happiness of the greatest number of persons. The reasons

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    where one acts based on the right motives, or if Utilitarianism, where one should act in a way that would produce the best results and consequences, should govern decisions and their morality. However, I believe Deontology, which is reason and duty based, serves as the superior way to dictate morality. In this paper, I will explain both the principles of Deontology and Utilitarianism, discuss the superior aspects of Deontology as compared to Utilitarianism, as well as grapple with objections to Deontology

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Rawls’ paper, “Two Concepts of Rules”, he sheds light on fact that a distinction between justifying a practice and actions that fall under said practice, must be made. This distinction, according to Rawls is crucial in the debate between Utilitarianism and Retributivism, more specifically in defending the Utilitarian view against common criticisms, which will be addressed further in this essay. This essay will be examining the troubling moral question that Rawls addresses; The subject of punishment

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    name of common good, it is Bernard Williams. He basically states that utilitarianism is too demanding upon us for the happiness of others, where we can’t even focus on the happiness of ourselves. Not only is a person responsible for the things they do in life, but they have to be responsible for the consequences of things that they don’t do in life that don’t bring the greatest happiness to everyone around them. Utilitarianism states that even if someone were to feel a negative way on a subject due

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This essay will reject the utilitarian claim as to always act as to maximize utility. In order to exhibit why this claim fails, this argument will be based on the most refined description of utility, namely, preference satisfaction utilitarianism, an action which is right, because it produces the most of what is intrinsically valuable, which is more than just the ultimate consequence of pleasure as suggested by the hedonistic utilitarian but instead, is the maximization of individual human preferences

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    focus on the ethical theory of Utilitarianism, it benefits but also its disadvantages which shows it is a theory which should not be used to handle moral disagreements. Utilitarianism is a type of relativist consequentialist ethic. Consequentialist ethical systems focus on the outcome of an action, rather than the agent or the action itself. Utilitarianism is a relativistic ethic because each time the outcomes of each ethical questions will be different. Utilitarianism considers the consequences of

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is a normative moral theory based on consequentialism-its fundamental idea is that “do what produces the best consequence”. In more detail the theory dictates that actions are only right if they promote happiness and produce the greatest amount of happiness; “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. By happiness is intended pleasure, and the absence of pain; by unhappiness, pain, and the privation of

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays