Returning to the 4th Armored Brigade Combat Team (ABCT) to assume command as the brigade commander brings me much joy to be reunited with great Non-Commission Officers and Officers that I have previously served with. Unfortunately, this brigade is no longer the brigade I remember when I commanded a battalion within the 4th ABCT not so long ago. In the last 30 days, I have had the opportunity to observe the ABCT and review a multitude of historical documents to assess the state of the brigade. During my observation, I believe the critical leadership problem in the 4th ABCT’s is the lack of vision for the brigade. Therefore, this critical problem has led to other challenging issues within the brigade. My intent is to provide a clear vision to the 4th ABCT, that states, “Be the best armor brigade in the world, consisting of trained, responsible, motivated, and caring Soldiers and Families; capable of executing any assigned mission with unequaled success. The 4th ABCT has experienced several challenges that have led to ethical and moral issues along with a lack of confidence in the leadership. A vision will provide the ABCT with a motto, something to up hold. Therefore, how current business is conducted needs to change. In order, to make a change and address the challenges that 4th ABCT …show more content…
The battalion commanders will have an emergency meeting going on simultaneously that will lay out long term and short term plans that we as a staff have created. The short-term plan will focus on objectives 6 months out and long term plans focus on 12 months out. These plans will consist of upcoming training, missions, and or deployments. This will help our brigade by exposing my vision and intent, along with an execution time line. Therefore, everyone is informed prior to my change of command and my vision is something they have heard and are beginning to
trained killer from a Green Beret Unit. CID was fine observing and identify Greeley as AWOL(Away without official leave), but they also felt hard pressed to take Greeley under custody since he might not be willing. In both cases it would be necessary for the Green Beret unit to police itself. It was the proverbial chicken/egg scenario.
Task Organization: TC-16-001 1. SITUATION: A. Enemy Forces: N/A (1) Terrain: Petersburg National Battlefield-City Point is an urban environment with wood, brick and steel structures, interlaced with several improved and unimproved roads B. Friendly Forces: N/A (1) Higher Mission: ALU is the Army's premier learning institution, delivering game-changing sustainment professionals to support unified land operations and generating force capability. (2) Higher CDR Intent: Training future leaders of the US Army, to Army standards, by develop leadership, and evaluate officer potential.
Realizing the need, Major General Petraeus soon began to employ the division to work local nationals to restart water and electricity and working to reopen schools (Lundberg, 2008). Lacking any guidance from his leadership, Petraeus took many prudent risks in order to further see these plans through by utilizing his own assets. For example, according to Lundberg, he utilized assets such as Army engineers to begin clearing rubble and debris from cities, villages, and roadways. Conclusion Providing a strong leadership approach and willingness to take risk, Major General Petraeus was put on a mission to develop and implement strategy to establish stability in Mosul, Iraq.
Leaders at all levels of the Army are faced with difficult decisions every day, decisions that can affect the lives of everyone around them. The thought processes used by individual leaders to make decisions can be as far reaching as their imagination; however, it is every leader’s responsibility to make these decisions using the tenants of mission command. Mission command is not an easy skill to master, however great leaders understand it and the proper use of it when planning a mission. Mission command is broken down into six major principles: Build cohesive teams through trust, create a shared understanding, provide a clear commanders’ intent, exercise-disciplined initiative, use mission orders and accept prudent risk . General Douglas
An environment where military members account for themselves as well as others will have a powerful positive impact. Accountability is a must have for all effective
Formica was the keynote speaker for the 33 Brigade Combat Team’s (33D BCT) military ball, which was held only months after the Brigade returned home from Afghanistan. The ball was just after the Officer Career Progression Management Selection (OCPMS) board was held to select the next round of promotions and battalion commanders. Before
The topic of this writing assignment is the Brigade Aviation Element. In today’s day and age, waging a war has never been more complex for commanders. In an ever-evolving battlefield advanced weapons, assets, technology, and information have become both a blessing and a curse to commanders. In a high-paced unforgiving environment, commanders are required to make accurate effective decisions at a moment’s notice. One of the greatest challenges for ground force commanders has been effectively utilizing Army aviation assets in coordination with the ground effort.
The 34th, operating as a unit of the 24th Infantry Division along with many others endured some of the most horrific combat, under awful weather and terrain conditions during the War in the Pacific. The 34th Infantry Regiment securing the island of Mindanao lasted until late September of 1945. Their efforts resulted in upward of 22,000 Japanese soldiers surrendering. More than 10,000 Japanese Soldiers died in combat on Mindanao. From April to August of 1945 approximately 820 U.S. soldiers were killed in eastern Mindanao and 2,880 were wounded.
He played a critical role in the re-organization of the battalion as five unit transition from MTOE to TDA structure, providing invaluable analysis in the re-alignment of personnel necessary to achieve organizational operational needs. His diligence will have a lasting impact on the future of the 41st Signal Battalion. Leads 2LT Arcila is an exceptional leader who successfully led his team in a demanding environment. His reputation as a “go getter” and problem solver is widely known amongst his senior leadership and peers alike. Develops 2LT Arcila developed both personal and professional relationships, extending influence well beyond the chain of command in order to achieve.
General Odierno’s speech at the 2012 winter AUSA symposium best illustrates forth phase of the force development process, determine organizational authorizations. This is because the speech outlines the three major steps in this process which are Total Army Analysis (TAA), Program Objective Memorandum (POM) Force, and Planning Programming Budgeting and Execution (PPBE). First, when looking at the speech General Odierno focuses much of his discussion on total requirements and resources required based on priorities. This specifically comes out with capability demand analysis and the task for TRADOC to look at Brigade Combat Team design as well as warfighter assessments, other analysis, and combat modeling.
Additionally the physical separation of SFAT battalions combined with solid performance while assigned to a different Brigade (BDE) established a separate unit identity for the “War Harks” and they distanced themselves from 4th ABCT. Although improper training, organizational construct, and manning and equipment challenges were all contributing factor, I believe the catalyst for 4th ABCT’s culture decline was the deaths of the BDE Commander COL Timmons, the BDE command sergeant major (CSM), and one of the battalion commanders’. The catastrophic loss of the 4th ABCT command team took a tremendous toll on the BDE staff and key leaders, especially the DCO, LTC (P) Tagoli. After this event LTC (P) Tagoli and several members of the staff became resentful of the mission and numb to the actions and needs of their Soldier. When COL Lanks took command he left many of the responsibilities for daily operations with the deputy brigade commander,
Company Commander, written by Charles B. Macdonald in 1947, is a personal account of first-hand experience narrating the every-day events during World War II as a Captain in the United States Army. Ronald H. Spector, a Vietnam veteran and author of Eagle Against the Sun, opens the book with an introduction, highlighting Captain Macdonald’s accomplishment of becoming the Army’s Chief Historian. The book is written candidly, offering every memorable account that he and his men went through—the good times and the bad times—during World War Two, on the front lines and in the rear. This non-fiction text cost less than 12 dollars and contains captivating, vivid accounts of the war form Captain Macdonald’s point of view. It also encompasses the remarks and expressions of those who found themselves in the war, voluntarily and involuntarily.
Many seem to over emphasize the many privileges gained as an officer and seem to completely overlook the ever more important duties that should be the true motivators. I must ensure to maintain this mindset. I must also remember to put “people first”. (Department of Defense, 1988) This will be a cornerstone in every decision I make.
a. The Army White Paper seeks define ourselves as a Profession of Arms and as Professional Soldiers in the era of constant conflict that we now live in. The paper is a thoughtful look into the past, present and future of our profession. It will have top leaders thinking about the direction of our profession and ways to keep the American Soldier a professional in his field. b. The beginning of the paper talks about the Army as a profession of arms by posing the question, “what does it mean to be a professional?”.
After viewing the German blitzkrieg strategy used in the invasion of Poland, Russia reevaluated its armory in fear of German aggression. Recognizing the German superior tank technology, the Russian authorities commissioned a design for a new tank. Mikhail Koshkin and his team of designers engineered a tank that surpassed expectations (Tucker-Jones). The Soviet engineers designed the T-34 tank to be one of the most versatile tanks of World War II, and its use enabled key victories that enhanced the Soviet Union’s ability to defeat the German aggression. Koshkin and the designers packed the T-34 with many functional design features that made it a great all-round tank.