ipl-logo

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Federalist No. 51 By James Madison

825 Words4 Pages

Primary source reading 7.4 is an excerpt from “Federalist NO. 51” which was written in 1788 by James Madison. This excerpt is actually an essay written by Madison and published in the New York Packet that explains how the federal government will not become too powerful as the people think, and trying to convince people to get the constitution ratified. Primary source reading 7.5 is an excerpt from “Observations on the New Constitution and the Federal and State Conventions by a Columbian Patriot” written by Mercy Otis Warren in 1788. This excerpt is actually a pamphlet that was published as well. In this pamphlet, Warren criticizes the Constitution for thinking the federal government will get too much power and tries to get the people to reject …show more content…

Warren was furious at the proposal of this such called Constitution. She argues how they fought for Independence but with this proposal, everything will go back to the old way with Britain and they won’t be independent anymore. Warren feels that all the people are being left out of the “secrecy” of the federal government and with the constitution, they will have more power to be secret, deciding ideas on their own. She is mad that the representatives of the government aren’t corresponding to the people and are making decisions themselves, without the approval or even say of the people. In her eyes, the people aren’t being represented, as they should be. Warren feels she has the people sided with her, saying this, “…yet the voice of the people appears present strong against the adoption of the Constitution…” (76) She is saying that even though other conventions and states have ratified, the peoples’ voices matter and there is still some that reject this Constitution and won’t give in. Warren tries to get people to not ratify it by explaining her conspiracies in this pamphlet, read by the

Show More
Related

  • Who Is Mercy Otis Warren An Anti Federalist

    751 Words  | 4 Pages

    As an Anti Federalist, Warren was opposed to the idea of the new Constitution. She believed that the United States was moving towards consolidated government rather than state sovereignty. She felt that the federal government should not have complete control (Wolverton). This would be hypocritical towards one of the original ambitions of the Revolution, separating from a government that was too powerful over them. She believed that Federalists, such as John Adams, had not only lost their Revolutionary principles, but they have also begun to renounce republicanism

    Read More

  • Explain What Objections To The Constitution Were Held By Such Anti Federalists

    918 Words  | 4 Pages

    2. What objections to the Constitution were held by such Anti-Federalists as Mercy Otis Warren? Anti-Federalists thought that a House of Representatives was not sufficient for the representation of everyone. A government operating at a distance meant that the people can’t keep track of

    Read More

  • 7.5 Vs Constitution

    480 Words  | 2 Pages

    He begins by trying to encourage the people to see that the constitution will take away what they have fought so hard for. He continues by giving the reasons as to why the people should question the constitution. He mainly points out that there is a reason the Constitutional Convention was held in secrecy and that the people should recognize and be unsettled about this. Another reason he has no faith in the constitution and suggests that the people should not either is because they want it ratified quickly. He believes this is because they do not want the people to look over the constitution too thoroughly and find flaws or areas that will take away from the people having control.

    Read More

  • Earl Warren's Three Major Court Cases

    1064 Words  | 5 Pages

    arizona case of 1961”( Newton 2) which he was the chief justice for. The Supreme Court concluded that defendants must be informed of their rights; their right to remain silent and the fact that statements they made might be used against them, their right to consult an attorney, and their right right to have an attorney appointed if they could not afford one (Rose 301). You are required to state their rights to them, if they are not stated then they are self incriminating themselves. Without these rights being stated the people don't know what could or couldn't get them in even more trouble just by saying a couple words when you're being arrested. Warren was helping the citizens not to incriminate themselves, not get themselves in anymore trouble than they already are

    Read More

  • Ratifying The Constitution Dbq Essay

    1210 Words  | 5 Pages

    Patrick Henry was one of those famous powerful figures, patriots, who provided support for the antifederalists. Anti Federalists were in debt and they feared a strong central government who would make them pay-off their debts. They thought that it gave too much power to the national government at the expense of the state governments, and there was no bill of rights, thus, they opposed the ratification of the constitution. As shown on Document G, even in a political system, with checks and balances, a certain branch can be too powerful, which can lead to tyranny of the common people. This document was directed towards the Federalist by the antifederalist to explain a possible problem of the checks and balances system, after the drafting of the constitution and awaiting approval.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Abolishing Freedom Of The States

    690 Words  | 3 Pages

    Lastly, he states the constitution was created by people who were looking for their own gain. As a consequence, they sacrificed the happiness and freedom of the states. In short, Martin believes that the constitution is taking away the states governments and as a

    Read More

  • The Federalist No. 10 Argument

    978 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Federalist No. 10” is a persuasive argument written by James Madison in an attempt to ratify the Constitution. He wrote a series of documents called the Federalist Papers under a pseudonym to convince others to approve of the Constitution. He says that factions are not good for America, neither is a pure democracy. Madison provides extensive arguments and remedies for the problems he is addressing. James Madison is attempting to ratify the Constitution by analyzing the way to deal with factions, comparing a republic to a democracy, and by comparing a small government to a large government.

    Read More

  • Hysteria In The Crucible

    1279 Words  | 6 Pages

    Warren soon regrets her decision and looks to reconcile. The power she holds scares her and she wished to appease her past deeds od accusing anyone and everyone in the town of witchcraft. Mary works for the Proctors, and her ties seem to cause her guilt when she ultimately accuses Elizabeth of witchcraft and attempting to kill her. To rescind her actions Mary states “ Why, I-I think it is mine.[the poppet]” (Miller 75).

    Read More

  • Ratification Of The Constitution Essay

    494 Words  | 2 Pages

    The new constitution, a document granting the framework for a new democratic government, replacing the Articles of the Confederation. This new document gained approval from some of the citizens, but also raised questions and concerns from others. There was a constant back and forth between the two groups on whether or not the constitution should be ratified. This editorial provides historical background on the issue and expresses my opinion on which side I would’ve chosen.

    Read More

  • Stereotypes In The Crucible

    306 Words  | 2 Pages

    Mary Warren represents how women are viewed as weak. Mary Warren is depicted as weak in the sense that she is easily manipulated and cannot

    Read More

  • Warren Pryor Analysis

    707 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the poem, Warren chooses to quietly accept what has been given to him. This is made clear when “he[decides to say] nothing and [remains] hard and serious.” Warren doesn’t choose to have a conversation with his parents about his interest because he dose not want to disappoint them. He instead chooses to swallow his misery and “[say] nothing” because he understands that his parents have sacrificed a lot to make him who he is today. Therefore, he makes the choice of not fighting back for himself.

    Read More

  • The Constitution: Betrayal Of The American Revolution

    1106 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Constitution—the foundation of the American government—has been quintessential for the lives of the American people for over 200 years. Without this document America today would not have basic human rights, such as those stated in the Bill of Rights, which includes freedom of speech and religion. To some, the Constitution was an embodiment of the American Revolution, yet others believe that it was a betrayal of the Revolution. I personally believe that the Constitution did betray the Revolution because it did not live up to the ideals of the Revolution, and the views of the Anti-Federalists most closely embodied the “Spirit of ‘76.” During the midst of the American Revolution, authors and politicians of important documents, pamphlets, and slogans spread the basis for Revolutionary ideals and defined what is known as the “Spirit of ‘76”.

    Read More

  • Federalist Paper Number 51 Summary

    592 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the Federalist Paper number 51, Madison writes to the people of New York to explain that it is necessary for a separation of powers between the departments of the government. Madison, with the help of Hamilton, wrote the Federalist Papers to explain sections of the Constitution. In Federalist Paper number 51, Madison explains that the government does not have a strong structure on the outside, but creating a firm structure within the government could be a solution. The firmer structure would be the separation of powers. In order for the people to get a better idea and make a more accurate judgement about the separation of powers, Madison shares observations and puts them into simpler terms.

    Read More

  • Susan B Anthony Figurative Language

    974 Words  | 4 Pages

    “It shall be my work this evening to prove to you that in thus voting, I not only committed no crime, but, instead, simply exercised my rights, guaranteed to me and all United States citizens by the National Constitution, beyond the power of any state to deny. ”(Anthony, 1) is a quote from Susan B. Anthony’s famous “Women’s Rights to the Suffrage” speech that inspired change in our great country. This speech was the most compelling of texts because she used solid evidence to support her claim and she uses many different types of figurative language. The third, fourth, and fifth paragraphs were the most important in her speech. This emphasis on ‘We the people’ and not ‘We the white male citizens’ in her third paragraph leads me to my first point.

    Read More

  • The Purpose Of Anthony's Speech

    179 Words  | 1 Pages

    The purpose of this speech is to prove that women are citizens, and should be granted the right to vote. The reason for Anthony 's speech, other than her being a women 's rights activist, is that herself and a group of her followers were unfairly jailed for having voted in the 1872 presidential election (Peck and Wilmore). The judge wouldn’t let her speak on her own defense because he believed women were too incompetent to defend themselves in court (Peck and Wilmore). In this speech Anthony goes on to say that she didn’t commit a crime but simply,”...exercised [her] citizen’s rights, guaranteed to [her] and all United States citizens...”. Anthony also emphasizes that while black males were allowed to vote by the fourteenth and fifteenth

    Read More

More about A Rhetorical Analysis Of Federalist No. 51 By James Madison

Open Document