Renaissance education was a catalyst for change in education unlike the Middle Ages where education was primarily based on theology. Renaissance education revived the study of classics, took on an individualistic approach, and focused on humanistic pursuits. The values and purposes of Renaissance education were to familiarize wealthy people to humanities and arts as well as prove society but over time, these values were challenged and transformed when it expanded to include practical subjects and was targeted towards a wider audience. Some of the values and purposes of Renaissance education can be seen in the first two documents. Piccolomini, an Italian humanist, wrote about how people should hold knowledge in humanities (arithmetic, rhetoric, …show more content…
Annie Higginson’s letter to the Lady Ferrers signifies that education for women is also turning for the better. In this letter, a woman recommends a school for women to another woman (Document Nine, Letter to Lady Ferrers of Transworth Castle, England). This exemplifies the significant change in education because what was originally targeted to wealthy young men grew to include many women. In 1523, a man goes on to say that women need to be taught structure/morals and be literate. Once again, this is a major transformation, as a man is supporting educated women. This is important as the change in education implemented the idea that educated women would divert from Christian values but a man strongly opposing the idea dismisses it, and lends a supportive perspective of educated women. However, something that is not showcased in this document is that women were taught theology, basic arithmetic, and language which limited them to their lives at home. Not being so educated in a vast variety of subjects like the men of their times eventually led to the downfall of women. They lost power and and didn’t have a very crucial role in shaping …show more content…
In 1642, Comenius, a reformer in Bohemia refers to schools as useless and does not see it as real learning. As per his views, ‘real’ learning is taught in university. This document speaks for itself as many of the subjects are dismissed as impractical in relation to the lifestyle of people during the Renaissance period. As an educational reformer, Comenius would be more knowledgeable about changing schools. Therefore, this document can be seen as a reliable document (Document 13, Reformation of Schools). In 1622, Brinsley considers education as a waste of time. People only knew how to write in Latin which “no one of judgement will want to read” (Document 10, Consolation for Our Grammar Schools). He also refers to it as a waste of money because people would come back home just as uneducated as when they had left. This is significant because of the shift from just a few decades ago. This document once again brings up the point that people wanted education to be more practical. The humanities didn’t play an important role in the lives of people outside their schooling. This document is also reliable because Brinsley was a schoolmaster who had a firsthand account on the toll education took on students. In the mid-seventeenth century, a letter to the Parliament of Dijon was written where an unidentified author states that education is impractical for jobs that have more
While feudalism and the class system of the European middle ages seemed to guarantee that families would remain in their social strata for eternity, the philosophers of the Renaissance challenged that status quo. They suggested that people could—and should—question authority. For instance, in Erasmus of Rotterdam’s The Education of a Christian Prince, he urged people to, “judge all things on their own merits as ‘good’ or ‘bad.’” Like many of his time who considered themselves humanists, Erasmus believed the study of the liberal arts could help people dramatically change their lives.
Essentially, both documents complement each other and state that Renaissance education benefits no one and is senseless which is an accurate depiction. The education of the Reformation greatly transformed the inadequacy of Renaissance education. They taught literature, mathematics, history, theology, physics, as well as law and medicine; they did not limit themselves to literature in a foreign language. Although the Renaissance was thought to be an influential time for education, it did little to aid the majority of people which was what reformers
In the “Against Schools” article, author John Gatto describes the modern day schooling system and its flaws. He uses several rhetorical strategies in trying to prove his point. He successfully uses all three types of rhetoric in writing this article, which includes ethos, pathos, and logos. He establishes these strategies very early, and often throughout the article. He believes one issues with today’s schooling system is boredom, and that there is a distinct difference between what it means to be educated and schooled.
The Renaissance was a period in time where everything started to change after the middle ages. During this historical period humans stared evolving by becoming smarter and inventing useful recourses that have changed the world. The renaissance was a life changing period which brought more joy to the world after conquering the dark ages. The Renaissance changed man’s view on the world by using Art, Science and Literature to make humans brighter and because of the rapid information they were gaining. Art during the Renaissance grew rapidly because of Leonardo Da Vici, and Michelangelo who changed the way people painted and drew by creating strategies which made art more interesting.
In the book, The Bonds of Womanhood Nancy F. Cott illustrates the life of women during the 17th century, after the first settlers arrived in New England. Cott stresses the different and important aspects of women’s life during this time. Exploring their rights and duties, and finally the slow rise of womanhood and the gaining of important privilege, which, during this time, were common only for men. In the third chapter “Education”, Cott describes the role of education for women during the seventeenth century and how females were excluded from attending educational establishment since being literate was seen as a disgusting characteristic.
During this time, people believed that women were only good at cooking, cleaning, or nurturing their children and couldn’t do much else. Because people thought this way, women were uneducated unless they were in the upper class. Wealthy women would sometimes have private tutors that would teach them.
During the Reformation in sixteenth and seventeenth century Europe society’s view on women changed by women becoming seen as equals in religious and educational
The Age of Reason In Europe, during the Age of Enlightenment or the Age of Reason, many philosophers gathered together to discuss their different but similar ideas to help shape the world we live in today. In the late 17th and 18th century, four enlightenment philosophers named John Locke, Voltaire, Adam Smith, and Mary Wollstonecraft focused on the same main idea. They believed in individual rights and presented their arguments through religion, government, economics, and equality for women.
The Enlightenment was a period that is seen as the prime mover of thought from admiring and attributing the wonders of the world to God to moving the focus in learning about God’s nature in terms which are more attributed as fact. This time philosophers were known for their works and their continual critiques towards their societies. The philosophers were writing in terms regarding what they considered the natural order of nature. The writers were all contributors to the Enlightenment and showed aspects of strengths/weaknesses in the society. Montaigne, Baylor, Voltaire, and Immanuel Kant are the critics and vocal observers of their society, but their goals are exemplified through in a passage in Taste that says “authors agree that it is a good taste, above all, distinguishes the educated man and the civilized county” (335).
In the essay, "Did Women have a Renaissance?”, Joan Kelly-Gadol, presents a feminist insight into women's role in society during the Renaissance and how women did not have a Renaissance. While Margaret L. King, who wrote, “Women and High Power”, offers the roles of women and learning from 1300-1800 and argues that women did . The question of, “did women benefit from the Renaissance?”, is an extremely loaded question. Like every argument or question there are two sides to every story. One way, like Margaret L. King to look at this argument is that women experienced the Renaissance just like men did.
While I was given the opportunity to get educated because of my family’s high status in society, it pained me to see that the vast majority, which largely comprised of the third estate, was not given the same chance. Our ruler also felt the same way about this unequal distribution of knowledge, and the system of education in France was henceforth restructured. Now, I hear the sounds of children, from all corners of my country, bidding farewell to their parents and entering a whole new world of Rousseau, Voltaire, and Socrates. My heart fills with joy when I see the new generation of Frenchmen taking an active interest in the lives of their fellow countrymen and their nation. Finally, Napoleon and his government proved that they were secular and independent of the Church, and therefore would not make the same errors committed by previous monarchs.
The Renaissance is commonly known as a period of rebirth. New ways of thinking and acting were rapidly evolving. It was a time of great challenges and discoveries for the individual. People could share ideas, objects, and skills in so many ways that changed the whole outlook of humanity. For a while, the church told the people what they wanted them to believe.
There exist few ideological movements that leave such an overwhelming impact on the modern world, like humanism. Influential not only in the struggle between philosophies in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, it to this day affects the modern condition – especially that of a historian, for the modern notion of creating historical works by utilizing sources for one’s self holds roots in the humanist movement along with the discipline insistence on returning to the primary sources of each, rather than opinion of other scholars, as seen in the scholastic movement it competes with. The most well-known English humanist, Thomas More laid out new ideas on historical preservation, but that is only a small portion of his effect on his contemporaries and modernity, with the most poignant effects lying on his allotting the English a chance to see a society in which all men are equal under one unifying body, namely a King, after God; women receiving the same standardized education as men, which he
During the 17th and 18th century, an important movement sparked in Europe. Called The Enlightenment, it was an intellectual and philosophical movement that took over the world of ideas in Europe. One notable philosopher during the movement was John Locke, an English philosopher and physician. Philosopher Locke shed light on various critical and political matters that had an influence on the education structure and the perception of the childhood education. Through Locke’s book, “Some Thoughts Concerning Education”, he expresses important ideas that relate to the new ways of perceiving the childhood education, and the way education relates to the political views.
Denying someone to become educated based on their gender is a notion that is foreign to modern readers. Education has become a cornerstone of our society, pursuing the ambition of providing equal education for every learner. Mary Wollstonecraft, a late Eighteenth century writer, recognized the disadvantage that women were being bound to through the patriarchal societal demands that women to only be educated in means of being obedient, chaste, and beautiful. Wollstonecraft wrote her essay, A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, as a platform to present her argument of achieving education for women in areas to heighten their abilities to reason and find self-acknowledgement beyond their innate passions. It is also within this essay that she addresses