ipl-logo

Arguments Against The Exclusionary Rule

676 Words3 Pages

The exclusionary rule, as applied today, states that any evidence that was found using an unconstitutional method is also unconstitutional; therefore, inadmissible in court. This is because criminal proceedings are to be fair and impartial (i.e. “reason and truth”). I agree, by allowing the exclusionary rule into proceedings, the rights of the defendants are protected. Although the defendants may be guilty, there has to be a system in which the police should also be held accountable for the way they proceed in practice. The criminal proceeding is adversarial with the ultimate goal for both sides being to let the evidence and circumstances prove the truth; therefore, the way the evidence is gather should be a critical element towards a conviction. …show more content…

A system that does not establish guidelines and follows the constitutional provisions is a system that is more susceptible to corruption. As in the case of Mapp v. Ohio, the evidence would not have been held inadmissible in accordance to the exclusionary rule if the police would have taken the time get a warrant stating where to search and for what specific person or objects (warrant was not presented during trial) and the police should have communicated and cooperated with the defendant’s attorney. It may not be reasonable to let a guilty individual go free, but it is also not reasonable to violate constitutional rights. The fault of the release would then fall on the improper procedures of the officers, not the

Show More
Related

  • Jerome Scales's Conviction From A Jury In Hennepin County District Court

    853 Words  | 4 Pages

    custodial interrogations do not need to be recorded to satisfy the due process requirements in the United States. Moreover, there were seven police officers that testified one of which was not even part of their Department so it stands to reason that it is unlikely that seven officers would attempt to circumvent the law. However, it should be noted It is believed that there should be a remedy to the law as the recording of evidence allows for a quicker and more effective examination of the interrogations and better protect the rights of citizens. “An exclusionary rule is a drastic remedy. I believe such a drastic remedy should be applied only after a full hearing of all the policy implications and with adequate notice to law enforcement.

    Read More

  • Dollree Mapp Exclusionary Rule Case

    530 Words  | 3 Pages

    Numerous cases have been affected by this, and sometimes they’re even thrown out. The exclusionary rule is very controversial. Critics argue that if the police act improperly or illegally they should face punishment for breaking the law, but evidence should not be excluded from court. In the past 25 years court rulings have made exceptions to the exclusionary rule in certain cases or circumstances when evidence was gathered illegally or improperly. For example, if a police officer appears to have made a mistake or error while having good intentions, when it followed incorrect legal guidance or relied on incorrect information provided by another

    Read More

  • Orlando W. Wilson Summary

    372 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Supreme Court in view of crime and other dangers-offers police mobility in containing crime. In response to the crime in the early 1960’s, Orlando W. Wilson states how police in order to discover and eliminate crime, they must have the authority to question suspects under “reasonable suspicion and search a suspect on reasonable ground.” Usually when a Police officer needs to hold someone in arrest or search a suspect they must have a warrant. This idea proposed by Wilson is to search or talk with a suspect without a warrant only when provided by reasoning that said suspect producing suspicious behavior. This may seem as too much power in the hands of the police but this suggestion does not justify searching anyone and everyone.

    Read More

  • Exclusionary Rule In The Weeks V. United States Case

    475 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Weeks v United States case was the Supreme Court basis in determining to incorporate the Fourth Amendment into the Fourteenth Amendment due process clause and apply the exclusionary rule in state cases. In this essay, I am going to discuss the reason why the Supreme Court determine that the exclusionary rule should apply to the state police activity. Prior to the case of Weeks v United States, the state police activity “were not limited in their conduct by the Fourth Amendment” (Ingram p.81) and the exclusionary rule of Fourth Amendments illegal search and seizure only applies to federal law enforcement officers. Basically, it means that state law enforcement officials can illegally search and seized criminal activity evidence and court don’t prohibit the use of illegally obtained evidence in the trial court.

    Read More

  • Scalia's Principal Argument For Violating The Exclusionary Rule

    450 Words  | 2 Pages

    I don’t think officer did it right by violating the exclusionary rule, but if they believed that it was too dangerous for them, they sure did it right. I believe

    Read More

  • Mapp Vs Ohio Essay

    593 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the Terry v Ohio case, “The officer stopped and frisked the three men, and found weapons on two of them. Terry was convicted of carrying a concealed weapon...” (Oyez-Terry) the two victims of the unlawful behavior by the officer were obviously guilty of carrying a concealed weapon without a permit. Yet, because of the policeman illegally searched and seized the weapons from the three men on that street corner, the evidence had to be thrown away according to the Supreme Court, even though the evidence conclusively proved guilt in the

    Read More

  • Wolf V. Colorado Case Brief

    584 Words  | 3 Pages

    The police violated Wolf’s rights and since there was no warrant for arrest or warrant to search his office the police was trespassing. The police officer who violated his rights was to be punished by his superiors. The judges decided that using such evidence goes completely against the Fourth Amendment which is a basic need to our freedom. States should follow this law but are not directly forced to. States using evidence that should be excluded in their “statute becomes a form, and its protection an illusion,”(Wolf v Colorado, 1949).

    Read More

  • What Are The Flaws Of The Due Process Model

    222 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the United States Constitution, the Fourteenth Amendment, along with the Fifth Amendment, guarantees all citizens the right to due process of the law in all criminal proceedings. If we are to followed what is stated by the Constitution, the United States criminal justice system should adopt and use the Due Process Model. The hypothetical situation that is presented to us in chapter two using the Crime Control Model clearly has many flaws. When the officer pulls up to scene of the crime it is immediately established that the man with the gun is the criminal.

    Read More

  • Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule

    616 Words  | 3 Pages

    Fourth Amendment Is the exclusionary rule a benefit to us as a country or is it a hindrance to stopping criminals? When this country was in its infancy and we were part of another kingdom. We were being oppressed and harassed unnecessarily by the government. The present government at the time, which was the King of England was in the habit of searching people 's houses and persons, confiscating papers and effects without due process because they were attempting to stifle dissent (Gutzman, 2007).

    Read More

  • Essay On Exclusionary Rule

    452 Words  | 2 Pages

    The exclusionary rule should not apply to illegal arrest; considering, the Supreme Court has made it clear that the exclusionary rule does not apply to people arrested unlawfully; however, only evidence obtained illegally. (Hall, 2014) If the behavior of a government agency is an outrageous, shocking, and gross invasion of a defendant's constitutional rights, he or she may be free. (Hall, 2014) The Supreme Court has expanded legal luminary described as a "constitutional revolution" interpretation of "due process.

    Read More

  • Donald Dripps Model On The Contingent Suppression Order

    475 Words  | 2 Pages

    Donald Dripps model on The Contingent Suppression Order creating a “hybrid model” which combined the exclusionary rule and damages would only work in the real world if there was an accurate compensatory model that would be appropriate to each charge. According to Dripps model, “The judge is offering to rescind one, purely deterrent, remedy if and only if the government submits to another remedy that deters equally and compensates better. I can see absolutely no plausible argument that such a contingent suppression order exceeds the judge’s authority relative to the government.” (Dripp, 2001, pg. 23) Dripps supports his model by pointing out the areas in which a judge could vindicate the constitution without freeing the guilty. Therefore, Dripp proposal makes it clear that

    Read More

  • Crime Control Orientation Vs Due Process Orientation Essay

    920 Words  | 4 Pages

    Crime Control Orientation versus Due Process Orientation The main purpose of the crime control orientation is to secure peace by arresting as many law violators as possible, as fast as possible, and by using as few resources per arrest as possible (Kraska, 2004). Furthermore, because the defendants are presumed guilty (otherwise they would not have been arrested), releasing suspects due to procedural mistakes is wrong. In other words, suspects are guilty of their alleged crimes, otherwise law enforcement authorities would not spend the resources trying to prosecute the person (i.e., effective crime control does not focus on innocent people). It is believed that this quantitatively based tough-on-crime policy can be achieved by efficiently

    Read More

  • Mapp Vs Ohio Case Study

    1872 Words  | 8 Pages

    41. Mapp v. Ohio (1961): The Supreme Court ruling that decided that the fourth amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures must be extended to the states. If there is no probable cause or search warrant issued legally, the evidence found unconstitutionally will be inadmissible in the courtroom and not even considered when pressing charges. The exclusionary rule, in this case, is a right that will restrict the states and not just the federal government, including the states in more of the federal rights as outlined in the Constitution.

    Read More

  • Arguments Against The Exclusionary Rule

    493 Words  | 2 Pages

    The exclusionary rule is a lawful principle that the United States use, which expresses that the confirmation that was powerfully utilized by the police can 't be utilized in a criminal trial. The motivation behind why this is done it’s for the security of the established rights. In addition, the exclusionary rule states that in the Fifth Amendment no one "should be denied of life, freedom, or property without due procedure of law." The exclusionary rule additionally expresses that in the Fourth Amendment it is intended to shield residents from unlawful pursuits and seizures. It also applies to the infringement of the Sixth Amendment, which ensures the privilege to counsel.

    Read More

  • The Due Process Model: The Crime Control Model

    505 Words  | 3 Pages

    The idea that law enforcement can accurately detain suspects and find the truth in an informal setting as explained by the Crime Control Model is essentially thrown out, due to the basic psychology that “people are notoriously poor observers of disturbing events” (7). To keep this system running the Due Process Model is reliable because it calls for the “prevention and elimination of mistakes” (8). The Due Process Model also addresses that “power is always subject to abuse” and that “using maximal efficiency means maximal tyranny,” and how this can be stopped since the Due Process Model advocates for the rights of the accused (8). Also, the Due Process Model operates on the idea that you are innocent until proven guilty. Finally, where the Crime Control Model emulates an assembly line, the Due Process Model imitates an obstacle course, where law enforcement is hindered at every step by protective rights of the

    Read More

More about Arguments Against The Exclusionary Rule

Open Document