In this case questioning workplace harassment in terms of sexual discrimination and its prevalence to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Joseph Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services distinguishes whether or not discrimination can occur within the same sex. Joseph Oncale, a male, filed a complaint against his employer, Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. The petitioner was working at one of respondent’s service stations and he was part of an eight men team. In the complaint, Mr. Oncale is alleging that he was sexually harassed by his co-workers John Lyons, Danny Pippen, and Brandon Johnson. This had happened on multiple occasions in their workplace by physical sexual assaults, sexual threats and humiliating sexual actions. According to Oncale's testimony, a co-worker forced him to the ground while his supervisor took out his penis and placed it onto Oncale's head. The next day, a co-worker forced him to the ground while his supervisor took out his penis and placed it onto Oncale's arm. One of the team members actually threatened to rape the petitioner during these incidents. When Oncale reported this to his supervisor, he was told that behavior like this is rather normal and that he should simply not take it offensively. No actions were taken; in fact, Mr. Oncale was humiliated even more. In the end, he had to …show more content…
Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.,' the Supreme Court for the first time ever decided that sexual harassment of the same sex is actionable under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.It was stated before that sexual harassment of women by men or vice versa is discrimination and thereby a violation of Title VII. This may include pressuring a subordinate to engage in sexual activity as a condition of employment, or subjecting an employee to a hostile and abusive work environment. Now, in the Oncale case, the Court held that Title VII may also be violated when men sexually harass men or women sexually harass
As I mentioned earlier not everyone is aware of what The Family and Medical Leave Act is, what the law is for, and how it can be or should be used when they should if the company where they work employs more than 50 people. By law employers are supposed to inform all employees about FMLA. In the case of Jeffrey Angstadt verses Staples Contract and Commercial, Inc. Angstadt was wrongfully fired because he did not know about the FMLA and could not balance his work responsibilities and taking care of his ill wife.
1. Case Cite: [Nafta Traders, Inc. v. Quinn, 339 S.W.3d 84 (Tex. 2011)] 2. Facts: In Nafta Traders, an employee sued her employer for sex discrimination in violation of state law. The dispute was sent to arbitration, where the employee prevailed. The employer demanded the award in court, disputing that it has damages that were either not allowed or for which there was no evidence.
Case Citation: Linda Williamson v. The City of Houston, 148 F. 3d 462 (5th Cir. 1998). Facts: Houston Police Officer Linda Williamson was working in the Organized Crime Squad and was sometimes assigned to partner with fellow Officer Doug McLeod. Williamson alleged that over an eighteen month period, McLeod harassed her every day creating a hostile work environment. More specifically, Williamson stated that McLeod conducted obvious and demeaning inspections of her appearance. He made comments to her on how her body looked in different clothes and remarked specifically on the appearance of her buttocks and the size of her breasts.
Per summons and complaint, plaintiff claims assault and false arrest. Plaintiff states that he was handcuffed, grabbed, and physically thrown through a plate glass window by defendant Sgt. Eliezer Pabon. Disposition of the criminal case is unknown at this time.
Though in Grutter v. Bollinger we deal with the 14th amendment of the Equal Protection Clause and racial classifications too, the way race is used is slightly differs. In this particular case, the court had to decide whether the use of race at the Univeristy of Michigan Law School during the admissions process violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th amendment. Barbara Grutter, a Caucasian applicant, applied to the University of Michigan in 1996 with a 3.8 GPA and a score of 161 on her LSAT. Grutter was placed on the waitlist, but was subsequently denied admission to the school. Grutter claims that she was only denied because of her race, as the University uses race as a factor in the admission process.
ARGUMENT AND CITATIONS TO AUTHORITY Appellant, Mr. Bubbenmayer was working at BOCA BARGOONS OF MELBOURNE as a “manager” until the time his employment with appellee ended. Under the Fair Labor Standards Act he should have been paid at one-and-a-half-times his regular hourly rate for all hours in excess of forty (40) per week but appellee, Boca Bargoons of Melbourne wrongfully misclassified Appelant, Chris Bubbenmayer as overtime exempt employee in order to avoid paying compensation to which they are entitled during his employment. Appellee violates the federal fair labor standard acts by designating an employee as a “manager” who is entitled to overtime pay when that employee’s primary job responsibilities do not require supervising other
Ultimately the court found, if the HPD policy gave Bozeman the authority to accept harassment complaints, his knowledge can be imputed to the HPD for purposes of liability whether he exercised that authority appropriately or not. 9. Notes and Comments: A claim of hostile work environment sexual harassment under Title VII must be supported by proof “that the employer knew or should have known of the harassment in question
Beth Ann Faragher, a lifeguard who worked for the city of Boca Raton for five years, brought an action with a claim for sexual harassment against her supervisors, Bill Terry and David Silverman. This claim was seen under Title VII which bars discrimination because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. She claimed that the actions performed by the supervisors had created a "sexually hostile atmosphere" at work which included continuous offensive touching that was not requested as well as offensive language to describe women. Faragher specified that occasionally, Terry would frequently touch the female lifeguards without permission. Moreover, Silverman, the other supervisor, would also make vulgar insults to the females.
Luigi Vittatoe Dr. George Ackerman ELA2603 Administrative and Personnel Law December 2, 2015 Week 6 Case Study: R. Williams Construction Co. v. OSHRC 1. What were the legal issues in this case? What did the court decide? R. Williams Construction Company petitions for review of a final order of the OSHRC for violations of the OSHA Act.
Companies would ignore the women’s compliments of them being sexually abused and receiving sexual harassment. Its disappointing because this companies where the biggest cleaning companies and still had problems resolving these types of problems. I think it’s unfair because if this same problem happened inside an office or in a higher position, the company would have taken an immediate response to this problem and probably terminated the abuser in that same time. I think these companies de-value women’s work, because they see it as a simple task that they don’t need a degree or certificate to do it. Most of these women are undocumented and most of them don’t know their rights, which companies take advantage of
1. What was the legal issue in this case? The legal issue in the case of Davis vs. The Board of County Commissioners of Doña Ana County is the acts of negligent referral or mis-representation. Joseph Herrera was hired on January 20, 1995 as an employee of the Mesilla Valley Hospital (MVH) as a mental health technician.
We are going to pretend that this never happened and you are not to speak to anyone else about this.” The worker said this in a clearly threatening tone. If those who are being victimized by sexual assault are also being discouraged from reporting it how do we move forward from this and preventing it from happening again in the
The M&O guy laughs it off as no big deal afterwards but is “red faced” mad when he says it. He does it to others and it is tolerated as just how he is. Myron wasn’t ready to tell me who, said he wanted to try to record it with his phone. I told him as a supervisor I’m obligated
Sexual harassment and sexual assault are very serious issues happening today in the workplace. Women or men have suffered from unsolicited sexual behaviors that are typically provoked by someone “higher” in position. “Sexual harassment especially has been a fixture in the workplace since women began to work outside their homes” (Fitzgerald, 1993). It is solely the responsibility of the employer to ensure that all employees within are aware and are very cautions of laws, misconduct, and liabilities. Employers must enforce the Policy Prohibiting Discrimination and further extend those laws and guidelines to their employees.
Sexual harassment is identified as any unwelcome and unwanted sexual advances, verbal or physical behavior of sexual nature and requesting for sexual favours due to which a worker’s performance is affected, he/she suffers from psychological trauma or an offensive/hostile atmosphere is created at the workplace. The occurrence of workplace sexual harassment is linked with several risk factors. The nature of job and particularly the gender ratio at a workplace and traditionally male oriented jobs are among the significant ones. These pose an increased risk for women to face situations of getting sexually offended or harassed.