Tony Le
History
Campbell - MW
Final Exam
1). Following the Seven Years War or French and Indian War, the British were in massive debt. The war resulted in a countless loss of lives and the British struggled financially. The cost of the war was over 75 million in 1754 and 133 million by 1763. Because of debt, the British needed to find ways to pay it off. One of many ways was to impose taxes on settlers and the colonists. Whether it was on items, materials and/or land, tax was imposed without the people’s permission. This action and others ultimately led to dissatisfaction of the colonists and resulted in rebellions and revolutions across the land.
In 1763, the British issued an order called the Proclamation of 1763 stating that colonists
…show more content…
After being captured and transported to the Americas to work as a slave, he was able to earn enough money to pay for his and his family’s freedom. His idea of liberty was to simply be free and buy the freedom of his family members so they can be reunited. Broteer also fought for Lord Dunmore, the leader of the Ethiopian regiment whose motto were to liberate the slaves. Ezekiel Brown on the other hand, was an imprisoned African American shoemaker who was thrown in jail for debt. He, like many African Americans, thought that joining the Continental Army was a way for freedom imprisonment. He initially did not know which side he was fighting for. His idea of liberty was to save himself. Other colonists at this time who fought alongside the French wanted to be liberated from the hands of the British. They believed in the idea of freedom, new life, equality, and a greater country. They hung onto their beliefs and fought for a nation they believed would thrive. This idea was the more common one that most revolutionist shared. Joseph Brant was a Native American loyalist who was aligned with the British Empire. His idea of liberty was for his Native people. He believed in fighting for the sake of his tribe and to protect his land. He was also fighting to protect the idea of sovereignty, which would be taken away if the revolutionaries had won. Hermand Husband was a farmer and leader of the regulator movement. …show more content…
It began with disputes pertaining to how the government wanted the colonies to be ran. Originally, the Federalist supported the British. After the Declaration of Independence, they brought the idea of the U.S. Constitution to eliminate, or ‘make-up’ for the Articles of Confederation. Federalists believed that the U.S. should have a strong Central or National Government which was the complete opposite of the Articles of Confederation. The Federalists were responsible for creating the first national bank for the government. They also thought that only wealthy and educated people should govern the states because the common people did not necessarily know what was best for the nation. The United States Constitution is a product of federalist strategies because it gives the federal government power to deal with national problems. The central government can enact laws, levy taxes, and declare
Taxes! After the French and Indian War, the British government needed money to pay for the cost of protecting the colonists from the French and Indians. The British government approved several taxes including the Stamp and Tea Acts to help pay for the costs of the war. The colonists were expected to pay these taxes.
The Constitution of the United States, a document setting up America’s government system. When we broke away from the big, bad king of England after the revolutionary war, we strived to create a government unlike the tyranny we had before, a democracy. The Articles of Confederation were created, giving the states more power then the central government. It got the US nowhere, many problems arised, each state which different money systems, different tax laws, and a central government that had no power over the states. Many people knew this government was not working, and most likely would not last long, so a group of individuals (rich white males) came together to discuss a new form of government, around the idea of federalism.
The Federalists believed in many things and had strong support. They believed in strong federal government and rule by the wealthy class, which caused them to favor the idea of national bank and business. They argued that the national bank was allowed because the Consitution gave Congress the power to issue money and regulate trade. They also trusted a loose interpretation of the Consitution, this made them think they had implied powers, which were powers not included in the Consitution. Another thing that the Federalists believed in was protective tariffs.
Federalist’s ideas about functions of the central government encompassed a national appeal that influenced adoption of the constitution. They convinced the delegates that a strong national government was capable of ensuring equitable resource sharing. By quoting the gaps in the Articles of Confederation, the Federalists expressed the concern that passing the constitution would address the highlighted inefficacies to make American a sustainable nation. Also, Federalists were open to new ideas including the consideration of the bill of rights. Contrariwise, the Antifederalists did not prosper in the mission to convince the delegates to oppose the constitution that provided supreme powers to the national government (Hamilton, Madison and Jay 67).
In order for this new government they wanted to change the Articles of Confederation which they had followed under. But this government has gave too much power to the state and federal had barely any say or could control their people which got out of control. The next idea would have to change the articles or either decide to make a new government. Ratifying the constitution had to be approved by all Founding Fathers and also 9 out of the 13 states had to approve of this new government. The federalist became a group of people that were in favor of the constitution and were ready to put into place this new government.
For example, James Madison and George Washington were of the republicanism view, and Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin were of democracy. The public rhetoric that motivated them was political power and freedom. On a private level, Patriots were driven by the desire to protect Americans right and equality. The Patriots are the ones who took the fight to the stronghold cities of Britain and loyalists. By June 1776, the Patriots were in control of the 13 colonies, and loyalists were without the power to match them (Miller 87).
When our government first started, our founding fathers had different views on how we should interpret the constitution. Influential people like Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson had opposing sides to topics, so they went and formed political parties. Jefferson formed the party known as the Democratic-Republicans, and Hamilton formed the group known as the Federalists. One topic they faced was whether they should be strict or loose on viewing the constitution. The Federalist believed that we should look at the constitution very loosely.
These individuals believed that a federal government with the ability to raise taxes, support an army, and regulate trade between the states, as well as settle interstate disputes, would be good for the nation and assist the country in becoming a successful, competitive nation. The Federalists believed strongly that a powerful federal government was crucial to the continued existence of the country and its ability to develop into a country of merit. As mentioned in Federalist Paper XV, “It must in truth be acknowledged that… they in general appear to harmonize in this sentiment, at least, that there are material imperfections in our national system, and that something is necessary to be done to rescue us from impending anarchy” (Hamilton et. al. 1787).
The colonists were patriotic to a country not yet established. They fought for liberty because they saw a future in which they could be free from tyrant rule. This hope guided their long fight for freedom from tyranny. They wanted to become their own nation and give the people the rights King George III had deprived them of. In the distance they saw the future of a fair, kind nation that treat its citizens with respect.
Under the Articles of Confederation, the government grew too weak, and some thought that chaos would soon fond over the newly founded nation of colonial America if this situation wasn 't taken care of quickly. The idea of rewriting the Articles sprung, but some thought of writing a whole new constitution and starting from square one would be the best decision to make. Under this new constitution, the nation was to use a federal system or federalism. Federalism is a system, in which the power to govern is shared between the national government and the states. It took two years of disagreements between the states, but the new constitution was finally ratified and had finally become the new foundation of our nation.
Its spring 1865 and the Civil War is finally over- costing more than 600,000 lives, and a downfall economy for the South. Although economic reasons, slavery and state’s rights led the Civil War and had caused much damaged to the South, it still gave many African Americans slaves their freedom. But now what? What should the Nation do with the free slaves besides focusing on reuniting and reconstructing the South? Just because African Americans weren’t no longer slaves, does that mean they have the same social, politic and economic life as a white American?
The Federalists and Anti-Federalists The Federalists were the people who supported and proposed the U.S. Constitution. They had a wish of a stronger national government and were in favor to ratify the U.S. Constitution to manage debt and pressure following the American Revolution. Most of the Federalists lived in the metropolitan areas. The Federalists wanted the government to help regulate the economy because the majority of them dominate big business and arts. They supported the central banking and central financial policies.
The federalists understood where they were lacking and needed to change things up. The Constitutional Convention established a new government which divided the powers executive and legislature. “In contrast to the Articles of Confederation, the new national legislature would be the supreme law of the land and would be binding on the states.” (Keene, Cornell & O’Donnell, 2013, p.144). Under the Constitution, the people would be a whole nation with power divided to the states and the central government.
Soon after the Seven Years’ War, the British and the colonists learned that victory came with a rather expensive price (Kennedy, Cohen, & Bailey, 2010). Great Britain tightened its grip on the colonies in North America, expecting colonists to pay for their financial struggles. In order to make colonists pay for the war, Great Britain reminded the North American colonies who had authority by controlling the colonists to submit to various ordinances ratified by British Parliament. This action only showed that arrogance leads to rebellion socially, economically, and politically. Socially, a lack of communication between Great Britain and the North American colonies was to blame for the Revolutionary War.
4. How did the Great War for Empire change the relationship between England and its American colonies? The Great War for Empire, or Seven Years’ War went on between 1756 and 1763. The unfair taxation of the colonists is what sparked this war; there were also several other political and economic factors, which also played a large part.