Documentary maker, investigative journalist, and author, Gini Sikes, spoke to UCF students on Thursday about workplace inequality, pregnancy discrimination, and equality laws.
As a part of the Graduate Studies Speaker Series, the College of Graduate Studies had Gini Sikes, the author of 8-Ball Chicks: A Year in the Violent World of Girl Gangsters, speak to students in the Morgridge International Reading Center.
The presentation began with Sikes asking students and faculty if they thought that the constitution explicitly gave men and women equality. Some raised their hands, and Sikes replied that there is no legislation that guarantees quality of the sexes, particularly in the workplace.
“The reality is that the gender gap exists in 98.9%
…show more content…
Sikes said that the film aims to bring awareness to the lack of gender equality in the United …show more content…
“Parking lot attendants typically make more money than child care attendants; not that we care more about our cars than our children, but it’s that one is primarily male and the other is female,” said Sikes.
Sikes earned a Master’s degree in Journalism from Columbia University. She has won many awards, such as a Planned Parenthood Maggie Award for exceptional media coverage of reproductive health and a Knight Fellowship for journalists from Stanford University. As a writer, her work has appeared in Vibe, Essence, The New York Times, Washington Post, Ebony, Elle, Harpers Bazaar, Glamour, Travel, Leisure, and many others.
The Graduate Studies Speaker Series is being held to celebrate the 15-year anniversary of interdisciplinary graduate programs at UCF. The Speaker Series is meant to revolve around integrative concentrations at UCF by bringing influential spokespeople to campus who are using multifaceted skills to bring about positive social
Book Paper: 37 Words I had the opportunity to read the book “37 Words: Title IX and Fifty Years of Fighting Sex Discrimination,” by Sherry Boschert. In this book, Boschert presents the story of women working in higher education in the 1960s and fighting for gender equity. These women realized that their frustrating experiences at work were not isolated incidents but rather part of a larger system of discrimination against women. Their activism led to the passing of Title IX in 1972, which prohibited discrimination on the basis of gender in all schools receiving federal funding.
Vicki Schultz uses the case of EEOC v. Sears Roebuck & Co. as an example of sex segregation of women in the workplace. In this court case it was found that the employer had not discriminated against women in commission jobs because the EEOC claims “were based on the faulty assumption that female sales applicants were as ‘interested’ as male applicants in commissions sales jobs. ”(174) Therefor Schultz suggests “lack of interest” in those commission sales jobs “rests on conventional images of women as ‘feminine’ and nurturing, unsuited for the vicious competition in the male dominated world of.”(174). She then goes on to describe that the “lack of interest” claim can be use in two ways; Conservative and liberal.
After Title IX was passed into law, schools and colleges were required to take action to make sure that they were not engaging in sex discrimination in any area of their operations, including athletics, admissions, and hiring. In cases where people felt they had been discriminated against, the law also established ways for them to make complaints. The passage of Title IX is a significant turning point in the struggle for gender equity in
Summary Freeman Hrabowski talks about how to improve the shortcomings of university attendees, especially those who are minorities and majored in science and engineering. According to him, we must first set high expectations which will drive students. It is all about having a thorough understanding, and not just enough to barely make it through. He states that secondly, a community has to be built among students by working in groups in order to support, understand and trust one another, as well as helping each other succeed. Hrabowski then explains how it takes researchers to produce researchers meaning, we have to expose the upcoming generations to the many exciting fields available to keep the fields and their enthusiasm alive.
We are Humans too, Right? For decades, women have been discriminated against due to limited job opportunities, low wages, and minimal acceptance to colleges. As an educated congress woman Shirley Chisholm was motivated to make changes in discrimination against women. In the early 1950’s Chisholm was accepted to Brooklyn College, New York, studied education then transferred to Columbia University for her master’s in Elementary Education; A few years later, she also served resolving issues regarding the Vietnam War, the National Organization for Women, the Bureau of Child Welfare.
This movie did a great job in making people think about how media has manifested our thoughts. Also one interesting point raised in the movie is that many film stars and super models, rather than few succesful females, are considered to be the representations of all women. And one explanation of these misrepresentation given in the movie is beucase majority members of decision board are men. This is actually a visous cycle. Many young women would actuallly believe in those
The film, based upon dialogue, use of imagery between the lead characters, and just the overall plot structure, suggests that the roles of the characters offer new possibilities. Like other films in Hollywood over the years, rather than exploit women and use the heavy appeal of sex, the film uses a contrasting mirage of a healthy and intimate relationship based on equality; the woman is not depicted less than her worth, rather as an individual achieving parity through her intelligence, creativity, and economic independence. In the process of creating this relationship, however, the film mythologizes the roles of men and
Based on the numerous examples exhibited each and every day on the field and off the field in America, it is clear Title IX has fallen short of its purpose. The Act states, in part, “No person shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any academic, extracurricular, research, occupational training, or other education program or activity operated by a recipient which receives Federal financial assistance…” (Parameswaran). Therefore, the goals of the bill were to create an atmosphere of equality for men and women.
In her speech, “For the Equal Rights Amendment” Shirley Chisholm addresses her views on securing women’s equality to ensure women have better opportunities. She is an American politician, educator and author that became the first black woman elected to the United States Congress. Chisholm supports her claims about equal rights for women by using examples of statistics to prove a point. Her purpose is to persuade her audience that women in America are neglected by equal rights and excluded from things that men are not. Throughout her deliverance she expressed an inspiring and informative tone to uplift her audience so that Congress can make a change for women.
Another thing that has not changed is that the wage gap has not closed. Today, females are paid only eighty percent, on average, of what males are paid. This gap is worse for colored women. Even though this gap has decreased since the 1930’s, it is still not right. Today, sometimes women still get victim-blamed, slut-shamed, and even being accused that rape was their own
and Berland Associates from November of 2008, states that the majority of people in the United States view the treatment of women at home as equal to men, whereas in the press, workplace, political settings, or the armed forces, treatment does not remain equivalent in treatment (Scherer 26). Progress has made steady yet gradual milestones towards the goal regarding women’s rights, but when it comes to the question of when dramatic change should take place, “the time is now”
With this current age in media describing a “war on women” it is no shock to see that a controversial piece has conquered its way through rival writing to gain the position it has today, and this may give other people their justification for selecting this article for their top three, but I don`t fall into this category. I didn 't selection such a piece due to agreements I made with the article, but quite the opposite. I refuse to accept that the actions faced by this one women, or any number of women, is justification to agree that the only war occurring is in conflict with women, but nevertheless this controversy is a great example of how the author, Amanda Hess, a journalist for Pacific Standard, can quickly gain the attention of the audience, of more than likely women from ages 18 to 35 years of age, to entice a reader to alter their mindset on social media in favor of the “war on women”. Certainly, one factor that advances this article is the style of storytelling used by the author to easily convey the message and organize the concepts and events for the reader. Ultimately, the author conveys this controversial message to rather convince or conflict the reader, creating an edge to the piece that cuts its way through to the top standings of journalism of 2015 and my personal rankings of top three, causing a respected appreciation, but not
This past summer I spent a week at Dirigo Girls State, and while there I had the opportunity to meet many girls with very diverse backgrounds. The focus of the week was to learn and understand the workings of government, although ultimately that week showed me what it meant to truly accept others. Each speaker that week addressed, in some way, the ever growing problem of social inequality in America. While those speeches mostly pertained to the importance of our generation equalizing women’s rights in America, I realized their words carried deeper and broader meanings.
Lucy Friebert says that changing the power dynamic to be sexist is making a “woman’s biology her destiny” and “exposes the complicity of women
Wage Wars Protecting our basic civil rights in the United States is a recognizable value that all citizens want to obey or carry out. Civil rights are rooted on the idea of any citizen not receiving equal or fair treatment compared to the people around them. Although this is true, a major issue in today’s society that I have discovered revolves around the difference in gender equality and the gender wage gap in the workforce. Some people believe that females are not as capable as males causing a flux in the wages paid for the same job, however this is a stereotype that needs to be exterminated.