ipl-logo

Essay On The Compromise Of 1850

585 Words3 Pages

When Henry Clay created the Compromise of 1850, his intent was to reduce sectional tension between the North and South, or more specifically, the free and slave states. In awarding each side a part of their list of grievances, the Compromise was supposed to appease the divided the country and stop a conflict. Unfortunately, the Compromise was not successful in its intent. It further divided the country due to the loopholes found in the Compromise´s words. The North got the upperhand of the Compromise of 1850 due to the region's power in the Senate, their unwillingness to obey the laws, and the idea of popular sovereignty.

In the decades leading up to 1850, every time a state wanted to be admitted, Congress had to take special care in not …show more content…

The Compromise of 1850 stated that the New Mexico and Utah territories annexed from Mexico were to decide whether they wanted to be a free or slave territory. The decision was easy for these two territories based on their backgrounds. Both of these territories had no interest in agriculture due to the terrain, eliminating slavery as a need. New Mexico and Utah had both been apart of Mexico, which outlawed slavery in 1829. Furthermore, the majority of Utah's population was Mormon. Slavery contradicted with the beliefs of the Mormons, so Utah had no interest in being pro- slavery. In conclusion, the balance between free and slave states was unable to be maintained through popular sovereignty.

The Compromise of 1850 ultimately led to more tension between both sides and was a contributing factor to the start of the Civil War. The Compromise failed to equally appease each of the sides and allowed the North to have the advantage. In summary, the North benefited more from the Compromise of 1850 due to the idea of popular sovereignty, breaking the laws, and their superior power in the nation´s

Show More
Related

  • Examples Of Henry Clay Compromise Of 1850

    193 Words  | 1 Pages

    Henry Clay came forward with he compromise of 1850. Although he held slaves himself, President Taylor opposed the extension of slavery into the territories of California and New Mexico. In 1849, California requested admission as a free state, which frightened the South because the admission of another free state into the Union would make slave-holding interests a minority in Congress. Southern Congressmen tried to block California’s admission. With the national government in gridlock, Henry Clay stepped forward in May 1850 to present a compromise, much as he had thirty years earlier when Missouri sought statehood.

    Read More

  • The Three-Fifths Compromise In 1787

    267 Words  | 2 Pages

    This act made any official who did not turn in a runaway slave liable to pay a fine; therefore, truly enforcing the law and safeguarding southern property. This also made every Northerner responsible for turning in runaway slaves. In Stephen Douglas’ “Speech Defending the Compromise of 1850” he stated, “Congress, after a protracted session of nearly ten months, succeeded in passing a system of measures, which are believed to be just to all parts of the Republic, and ought to be satisfactory to the People. ”7 Douglas believed by making this concession, the south would remain a part of the union.

    Read More

  • Charles Grandison Finney, A Woman's Rights Activist

    499 Words  | 2 Pages

    Questions for Days 131-150: 1. Charles Grandison Finney was an evangelist who was a preacher who helped in religiously reviving Americans. He was the first of the professional evangelists. 2. Dorothea Dix was a crusader who supported mentally impaired people.

    Read More

  • Why The Compromise Of 1850 Failed

    175 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Compromise of 1850 was an attempt by the U.S Congress to settle divisive issues between the North and South, including slavery expansion, apprehension in the North of fugitive slaves, and slavery in the District of Columbia. The Compromise of 1850 failed because Senator John C. Calhoun from the South and Senator William Seward from the North could not agree on what Henry Clay was putting down. Part of the compromise was to make California a slavery free state which benefits the North, and enforcing a stricter fugitive slave law which benefits the South. Both the North and South opposed what the other was benefiting from. What sparked the failure of the Compromise was the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850.

    Read More

  • What Are The Causes Of The Missouri Compromise

    205 Words  | 1 Pages

    After the thirty-four years, the slavery debate became a problem yet again. Therefore, the Missouri Compromise essentially shoved the slavery conflict out of view. Overall, I believe that the compromise resulted in the neither the North nor the

    Read More

  • Compromises In 1860

    510 Words  | 3 Pages

    P.6 Compromises seemed to be working in 1820 as a solution to political issues that America agreed to disagreed on. As seen in the Missouri Compromise, where Henry Clay made slaves free in twelve states and not free in the other twelve; in order to keep everything balanced. But between the period of 1820 to 1860, compromising took a shift and no longer seemed to be the solution. Compromises worked with Henry Clay in the Missouri compromise in 1820 but by 1860 due to a series of geographic, political, and social changes compromises were impossible.

    Read More

  • Calhoun Argument For The Compromise Of 1850

    818 Words  | 4 Pages

    During the early part of the 1800's, the Northern states banned the buying, trading, and use of slaves. They also advocated to get rid of slavery in the entire country. The Southern states had been using slaves to run their economy since their founding, as they did not have access to the plentiful natural resources found to the North. This caused a major conflict for Congress and our country, who all sensed a civil war would come if nothing was done about it. Then, in an attempt to make both sides happy for as long as possible, Senator Henry Clay proposed his idea for the Compromise of 1850.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Compromise Of California From 1800 To 1850

    596 Words  | 3 Pages

    Therefore, western expansion was an important contriution to growing sectional tensions between the North and South from 1800 to 1850 because while events like the MIssouri Compromise of 1820 and the Great Compromise of 1850 attempted to create a fair and balanced way to admit free and slave states, the North and South would still have underlying tensions due to the contsraints within the compromises and their incredibly different ideologies regarding slavery. Furthermore, western expansion was an essential contriution to growing sectional tensions between the North and South from 1800 to 1850 as rapid expansion increased economic and cultural tensions between the North and South, creating a divide between the two regions. In the early 19th century, the South was extremely economically proftiable. The vast majority of this profit came from the cash crop cotton. The South believed in the "King Cotton" ideology, believing that cotton was a superior crop and creating large plantations to farm cotton was essential to economic growth.

    Read More

  • The Fight For Freedom: The Compromise Of 1850

    155 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Compromise of 1850 was a serial publication of laws that attempted to change The territorial and slavery disagreements arising from the Mexican-American War from 1846 to 1848. The five laws, legal philosophy, balanced the interests of the slave states of the South. California turned into a free state. The Texas Lone-Star State received financial help for claiming the lands of the west of the Rio Grande in what is now known as the territory of New Mexico also including what is now known as Arizona and Utah were organized without any specific prohibition of slavery. The slave trade, but not slavery itself was abolished in Washington, D.C.; and the Fugitive Slave law was passed, requiring all U.S. citizens to help in the return of all runaway

    Read More

  • What Is The Compromise Of 1850

    241 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Compromise of 1850 was the division of the land gained from the Mexican-American War. The compromise was made up of laws admitting California as a free state, and then creating Utah and New Mexico territories. This compromise impacted these different geographical sections because the new sections being created through the compromise were now going to be allowed to vote for slavery in each new states. The compromise also affected old geographical sections such as Washington, D.C. were they ended the slave trade. There was also the creation of the Fugitive Slave Law, which stated that all fugitive slaves were to return to their masters.

    Read More

  • How Did The Compromise Of 1850 Cause The Civil War

    597 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Compromise of 1850 was an agreement that was made to defuse the crisis over slavery. Thus the issue of slavery in fact had the biggest impact that eventually led to the outbreak of the Civil War.” Henry Clay was the one who introduced The Compromise of 1850 into Congress. The Compromise of 1850 was the an agreement that attempted to defuse the crisis of slavery. California asked and was granted permission to go into the Union as a free state.

    Read More

  • What Was The Missouri Compromise

    261 Words  | 2 Pages

    As westward expansion continued, the number of free states would be twice that of the already existing, and only, slave states. The Missouri compromise showed the different opinions that the regions, mainly the north and south, had about slavery. In the north they

    Read More

  • Why Did The Missouri Compromise Cause The Civil War

    67 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Missouri compromise was an agreement between the north and south. It allowed Missouri to be the 24th state. Maine was also established, therefore Missouri was a free state. The Mason Dixon line was established, this created a line between the slave and free states. This rule was broken, and even more conflict was contributed to the start of the civil war.

    Read More

  • Compromises Between 1820 And 1860

    1121 Words  | 5 Pages

    However, the Missouri Compromise caused some problems. The compromise equaled the concerns and interests in the North and South, but the South was upset about how Congress gave itself the power to create and pass laws dealing with slavery. Much of the North was upset because Congress let slavery spread into another state. There were people who didn’t want to compromise, and others who did, such as Henry Clay.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Missouri Compromise

    198 Words  | 1 Pages

    Class, The Missouri Compromise did not effectively deal with the sectional conflict over slavery. This is because the compromise did not result in a definite solution that left both sides pleased but instead left neither side content (Kennedy 235). If the sectional conflict was resolved, this could have helped to prevent the secession of the southern states in the American Civil War, or this could have caused the American Civil War to start sooner rather than later. I believe that the North got the better side of the deal. At this time, the North and the South were worried about political and economic balances, and it seems like this compromise gave the North an advantage (Kennedy 234).

    Read More

More about Essay On The Compromise Of 1850

Open Document