The story and speeches of Ellie Wiesel are a statement to anyone who turns a blind eye to things and the result of doing so. The story as well as the speeches help argue why people shouldn’t be bystanders. In the story, the rhetorical strategy of pathos is used to invoke a certain feeling in the reader such as misery, hopelessness, and defeat. To begin with, the author used the pathos strategy of the feeling of losing someone to further his argument, in this case why individuals should not be ignorant. The book exemplifies this by sharing how people were taunted by the loss of family members. An example of this is seen when a woman named Mrs. Schachter lost half of her family and the way in which she coped with it. The original text shares, …show more content…
He explains that it is not right for him to accept a great honor piece on behalf of everyone that was lost during the Holocaust. Elie also claims how, “No one may speak for the dead, no one may interpret their mutilated dreams and visions.” (“Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance Speech.”) We can utilize this information to make the conclusion that even the living are also left with the guilt of surviving when devastating events take place. This is pertinent because it shows us, yet again the way the author incorporates pathos into his …show more content…
The speech contains many sentences where the speaker, Elie Wiesel, doesn’t have hope for the future and questions what life would be like if people continued to continue being bystanders. In the speech, he shares, “ We are on the threshold of a new century, a new millennium. What will the legacy of this vanishing century be? How will it be remembered in the new millennium? Surely it will be judged, and judged severely, in both moral and metaphysical terms.” (“The Perils of Indifference”) Reading this helps us realize how pathos is used as a result of the argument to be a witness that does something about tragedies and not a bystander. This is important because it helps strengthen the original message that the speaker is trying to get across to the
In source 1 Wiesel uses pathos by adding emotions known as loaded language. A term coined to mean the usage of heavy emotional language to impact the reader on a more personal level. An example the reader can see in the passage is in the following quote; "In a way, to be indifferent to that suffering is what makes the human being inhuman. Indifference, after all, is more dangerous than anger and hatred." -Elie Wiesel (source 1).
From this it could be inferred that Wiesel uses pathos because he wants to explain the pain the people in the holocaust felt. He wants to show how humanity caused that pain because of their indifference. Wiesel makes the audience feel guilty so they stop indifference. The author states in lines 172-75 ,”He has accompanied the old man I have become throughout these years of quest and struggle. And together we walk towards the new millennium, carried by profound fear and extraordinary hope.”
Postal uses pathos heavily in her text to incite her audience’s emotions. However, even though the text seems to rely on pathos there are trace amounts of ethos and logos in her writing that should be discussed to explain why the writing would not prove to be an effective argument. Postal starts her writing with pathos in a statement with loaded words to spark a reaction in her audience. The exact text used is:
Through the use of rhetorical questions, repetition, and pathos, Elie Wiesel effectively argues that indifference is present throughout the 20th century.
The audience is made sympathetic to his upbringing by invoking this reminiscence, which grabs their interest. “There was no joy in his heart”. The implication in this quotation is that, despite having become stronger in certain ways, the tragedy would not have made him the man he was at the time. Afterwards, Elie compliments Bill Clinton “Commander and Chief of the army that freed me, and tens of thousands of others” and Mrs. Clinton is thanked for her efforts to help (Wiesel)” But after that, Elie accuses the government of being indifferent during World War II by literally calling them out.
Pathos appeals to the emotions and the sympathetic imagination, making the book more appealing to the audience. The part in chapter two that really effects the audience’s emotions is projection because it tells the audience what they are really thinking, but will not say it out loud. “Projection colors almost every aspect of interpersonal relations. A genuinely naïve, truthful person will think all people he encounters are truthful” (Roth 47). Roth is saying that the way a person is they will see any other person the same way.
This quote is pathos because it makes the reader
One of this essay's most significant recurrent devices is pathos, and its frequent application supports the central
Nobel Peace Prize-Winning Author, Elie Wiesel, in his sympathetic speech, “The Perils of Indifference,” warns people about the dangers of indifference. He supports his claim by describing a scenario with a young Jewish boy and him being saved by American soldiers from a concentration camp. Wiesel also supports his claim by telling a story about how indifference is worse than anger and hatred through descriptive words. He finally uses imagery to give us a descriptive image of what indifference could do for the future. Wiesel’s purpose is to warn people of the danger of indifference in order to inform people of all the harm indifference can because.
Elie Wiesel, a famous author, speaker, and survivor of Auschwitz during the Holocaust, writes and speaks out about the detrimental atrocities that he has survived and tells about those who have not. Through his book and his speeches, his goal is to inform and persuade the people he reaches to speak out against horrors, like the Holocaust, and not let the perils of others go unseen. He says that to ignore these social injustices is to help the abuser and never the victim and in his pursuit of justice for all those who go unseen, he touches millions of lives with his disturbing account of the true tragedies of the Holocaust. In his novel, Night, Mr. Wiesel is informing people of the things he and his family went through in the Holocaust.
Ellie Wiesel’s “ Nobel Peace Prize '' and “The Perils of Indifference” speeches convey the idea of breaking out of the normalization of being a bystander who does not speak out against the world's injustice. Both of Wiesel's speeches express the message of the dangers of remaining indifferent when faced with suffering in the world. Wiesel continues to call attention to how tragedies will continue to occur if individuals do not speak out against them. To illustrate Wiesel’s impression of indifference in his “Nobel Peace Prize” speech he explains how people must talk out against the disasters and how people can not remain quiet anymore. Wiesel conveys this idea when he mentions being aware of this violence and terrosism and how it must not be normalized anymore.
Pathos is a technique that appeals to the reader's emotions and evokes feelings such as empathy, sorrow, and pity. The reader first notices this when the author acknowledges his broken home and child-like tendencies. Growing up, Perry's parents abused, neglected and abandoned him. Capote states, “Perry’s childhood experiences left him with deep emotional scars, he felt abandoned, rejected and worthless” (capote ). This evokes the reader's empathy for Smith's difficult upbringing, which may have contributed to his later actions.
Pathos is a rhetorical device used for providing emotion to the reader. He wants the reader to feel sympathetic towards the mistreatment of African-Americans. In the introduction, the first rhetorical device he introduced is pathos. Coates present pathos when he introduced Clyde Ross. He titles the first chapter as, “So that’s just one of my losses”.
In chapter four, Bryan Stevenson uses pathos to convince the audience that capital punishment is different than reading it on paper and shows the details around it. Throughout chapter four, you read about Bryan and his first case with his office, you forget everyone is a person and see the discomfort people are in the story. For example, “Believing in capital punishment is one thing, but the realities of systematically killing someone who is not a threat are completely different. ”(Stevenson 71). Bryan uses pathos in this section when he tells you about his first case.
The first section of the article uses the appeal of pathos in order to convey how he feels