1. Dual Constitutionalism is a government system that has two supreme powers. Dual Constitutionalism is similar to federalism, because an example of dual constitutionalism is a state’s government of residence versus the federal government where federalism is national and regional governments that share the power. Although both these powers are considered equal, because the power is in two, it is similar to dual constitutionalism’s split sovereign powers. 2. State constitutions and the U.S. constitution’s powers differ in the same way that I stated above. The U.S. Constitution almost sets up an outline that he states can use to then only add in the detail. Just as Florida’s 2, 3 and 4th amendment are all summed up in the Bill of Right’s 1st amendment. The U.S.’s constitutional powers hold a basic structure over all the people; however the states hold a more specified power over each resident of that state. …show more content…
State constitutions grant powers that are no limited where the U.S. constitution’s main purpose was to limit powers. State constitutions often have longer documents, as said above; the U.S. constitution is a basic outline, where the state constitution has a more specific outline that acquires more documentation. The U.S. constitution has changed only 27 times over the past two centuries, where the state constitution has room for improvement and is always changing. The U.S. has a representative democracy system that rejects direct democracy as a form of government. The states however believed that those types of constitutional arrangements were simply obsolete and wanted to give the chance for citizens to have a chance to participate in the creating of laws. Lastly, the U.S. constitution if allowed by bond buyers can continue expenses to any form of debt. Two third of state constitutions however have balanced budgets thanks to the executive and legislative branches. The other one third state constitutions have statutes that mandate balanced
The Constitution DBQ The Constitution of United States is regarded by many as an important document, for it gave the common people the power to form a government the way they want. Yet, despite all the benefits that it brought to the American people at the time, people also had some concerns about the Constitution such as: it is creating a Central government that is too powerful, only white men that owns property are allowed to vote, not everyone in the nation are treated equally, etc. When the Constitution was first being drafted, Representatives from each state hoped to add terms that would benefit their own states—this lead to a heated debate on how the Constitution should be formed.
In the United States, each of the fifty states has its own state constitution, which includes the basic provisions as the United States Constitution; however, state constitution is relatively more detailed than the national constitution. The purpose of this essay is to analyze and compare the similarities and differences of the state constitution of Missouri and the United States Constitution, emphasizing in three branches of government: legislative branches, executive branches, and judicial branches. First of all, both the state constitution of Missouri and the United States Constitution divide government into three branches in accordance with the concept of separation of powers. However, the compositions of the three branches are different
There are many similarities between the PA state constitution and the US constitution. However, there are also many differences between the two. These differences include certain rules and laws that the country has, but cannot enforce on the state. To start, the Us constitution states the right to declare war, which is a right focused on the state government, not the general civilization. This fact is a common difference between the two constitutions.
1. The US Constitution, along with the Constitutions of both California and Oregon seem to be arranged in similar fashion. All contain a preamble followed by Articles and Sections, but the similarities between them seemingly end here. In the Constitutions of both California and Oregon, the Bill of Rights can be found within Article I. Whereas in our Us Constitution the Bill of Rights is not seen until the first 10 Amendments have been added presumably nearly two years after. It is evident that while writing the US Constitution, our forefathers were most concerned with the presumption of power by the government.
Under the Article of Confederation each state were able to obtain their own legislation that address to their states citizen’s rights. Contrast to the Constitution, it does not address individual’s rights. Instead, it mainly list legislative powers. The Federalist believed that under these restriction in the Constitution over the government was sufficient enough to protect individual’s rights.
The Constitution introduced a new National government and divided the powers between the Federal government and the States called Federalism. Federalism is the function of national government today, the shared powers between state and federal government. Federalism is the shared powers between our State and Federal Government, a good thing about this shared power is that they don’t t have absolute power they can never do anything outrageous. According to the text, (Goals of the Constitution, 222) shared power between state and federal is Concurrent powers. Concurrent Powers can collect taxes or people income.
This is evident in document A, where it shows you a Venn diagram of which powers are given to the states and which powers are given to the federal government. For one thing, this shows how “a double security arises to the rights of the people”, which means that when the power is distributed between the states and the federal government, neither is able to gain absolute power over the country. Federalism also comes in handy by specifying what the states get to control and what the national government gets to control, which is meant to prevent conflict between the two powers. For example, the task of declaring war is meant for the national government only. If that wasn’t specified, there would likely be a lot of cases where states declared war, and the national government had to clean up the mess.
Each state has its own different constitution. The state constitution performs a number of important functions. The Texas constitution was established in 1876.The Texas constitution has some differences and some similarities. Both the whole U.S constitution and Texas constitution both were drafted as wealthy, predominantly-white ,and well-educated land owners. The U.S and Texas constitution both provide the separation of powers within the government and checks and balances within between government entitles.
The Constitution uses division of powers in order to prevent tyranny from occurring. James Madison, a man who was very dedicated towards our Constitution, decided upon dividing the government into two different sections, state and central, this idea is known as federalism. Powers needed to run a country are granted to the central governments, a few of those powers are printing and coin money, declare war, and regulate trade, and powers given to the state governments are the ability to hold elections, establish schools, and set up local governments. ( Document A ). The idea of federalism is important because it has a major effect on the prevention tyranny.
constitution would be the length and structure. The U.S. Constitution is longer in length than the Maryland Constitution. The U.S. Constitution is longer because it contains more information, laws, etc. It must be longer since it is the “supreme law of the land” and has jurisdiction over the whole United States. Their structures are also very different, the U.S. Constitution is more complex than the Maryland Constitution.
The Nevada Constitution and the United States Constitution United States Government has a constitution that resembles the Constitution of the State of Nevada. This essay seeks to establish the significant differences in the amendment process, the branches of government and the relationship between the people and government power in each document. Introduction The Constitution of the United States of America is known to be very old, probably the oldest federal constitution since the early 1780s. The Philadelphia states formed a delegation to frame the constitution in May 1787.
The U.S. Constitution fixed the imbalance between the state and national government. It established Congress, which was made up of the U.S. Senate with two representatives
and Texas Constitutions are similar documents. They both represent the principles of representative democratic government, in which power originated from the people. Both contain a bill of rights that protects civil liberties from government infringement, both provide for two branches of legislature with a House of Representatives and a Senate and both request a system of checks and balances and separation of powers between legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government. They also both divide government power between upper and lower levels of government. In the U.S. Constitution the states are subordinate to the federal government, and in the Texas Constitution the counties are subordinate to the state government.
DBQ Essay The United States Constitution is a document that or founding fathers made in order to replace the failing Articles of Confederation (A of C). Under the Constitution, the current government and states don’t have the problems they faced when the A of C was in action. The Constitution was created in 1788, and held an idea that the whole nation was nervous about. This idea was a strong national government, and the Federalist assured the people that this new government would work. The framers of the Constitution decided to give more power to the Federal government rather than the state governments because the A of C had many problems, there was a need for the layout of new government, rights, and laws, and there was a need for the Federal
The Texas and Maine state constitution are both used to govern their respective states. They both limit government, separation of powers, and also they both have bill of rights that protect the rights of the people. But, in various ways, the documents have key differences that distinguishes one from