Explain some cases in which you would perm-ban/temp-ban people Hacking: The worst thing in my opinion is to hack, it is so foolish and cheap to other players that are actually trying, they loose all of there things from a cheater, and that's not fair to me so here are some hacks that I would report to higher staff. If they are using kill aura its quite obvious, and they will be determined by higher staff if they will be permanently banned. If they are bunny hopping I would record it to show higher staff so they could be permanently banned. If they are using reach I will have to closely look at my recording to see the block range, I am good at telling hacks making it easier for me to notice. Lastly I know players that are accused of hacking that are not hacking, they are just good pvpers, and if they keep getting accused of hacks I will always go make sure that there not hacking, and I honestly don't care if I die, I am not that good at pvp anyway. …show more content…
Spam Bot: If there is a spam botter on the server, I will check his/she for any alts so I can tell higher staff to IP ban them. Impersonating Staff: This rule should not be happening on this server, that's why if I see someone impersonating any staff member they will be asked to change there nickname, or I will have to report to higher staff. Drama: If the Discord or Server is having some drama of someone harassing, threatening, or being annoying I would ask an Admin or Mod, and tell them what was happening and ask if they should be
Exclusionary Rule, states that if any evidence is illegally obtain for any case cannot be used in court. The case of “Weeks VS United States” is one example of how the exclusionary rule works. (Explain the case) I personally think rule goes well in hand with the fourth amendment. But with the exclusionary rule some would say that it cancels out the Patriot act.
Answering people 's questions, always telling the chat to watch the language and aswell as reporting hackers etc..
A player has been kicked and killed by a faction: I would /freeze the player who killed the person. Once in TS, the player will open a join.me and I will go through the player 's logs and check for any warning. If no warning of the kick is present in the logs then I will ban the player. If the player had warned the other person, I would then let the player free to go and kick the other from the channel. Somebody comes on the server with a spam-bot: I would instantly IP-ban/IP-mute the player.
Drunk Driving- Bars should take away keys as people walk in and if they suspect you of being too drunk they will call a cab for you. Cloud Hacking- Everyone should only use flip phones with no internet service. Immigration - Ban all travel to
Explain some cases in which you would perm-ban/temp-ban - Below is some examples of when I feel it is alright to ban. Following the OpCraft rule guide. Disrespecting staff - Disrespecting staff consists of being rude, a nuisance and even hateful towards. People need to remember that staff are humans as well.
The exclusionary rule was first established in the case of Weeks v. United States in 1914. During the trial, the Supreme Court ruled that the evidence obtained by the law enforcement officer was in violation of the Fourth Amendment and will be inadmissible in federal courts. This rule later became effective in the state courts in 1961 due to the unlawful search of Mrs. Mapp’s house in the case of Mapp v. Ohio. As a result of this case, Mrs. Mapp was convicted for possession of obscene materials but later argued that the law enforcement officer could not use the materials in the trial because they were obtained without a warrant. Although the exclusionary rule is not an independent constitutional right, it serves many purposes such as aiding in the deterrence of police misconduct and providing solutions to defendants whose
Many of these hackers serve time in jail after public trials and rarely deny allegations. The access to technology these crusaders have makes civil disobedience that much more
The exclusionary rule, as applied today, states that any evidence that was found using an unconstitutional method is also unconstitutional; therefore, inadmissible in court. This is because criminal proceedings are to be fair and impartial (i.e. “reason and truth”). I agree, by allowing the exclusionary rule into proceedings, the rights of the defendants are protected. Although the defendants may be guilty, there has to be a system in which the police should also be held accountable for the way they proceed in practice. The criminal proceeding is adversarial with the ultimate goal for both sides being to let the evidence and circumstances prove the truth; therefore, the way the evidence is gather should be a critical element towards a conviction.
The exclusionary rule is a deterrent against searches and seizures. Any evidence that is gained through an illegal search or seizure is now inadmissible in criminal proceedings, per the exclusionary rule. Supporters of the exclusionary rule argue that it helps prevent illegal searches and seizures against law enforcement. Those against the exclusionary rule argue that the exclusionary rule keeps criminals out of jail and there are other preventative measures such as suspending police officers without pay, dismissing them from a case, or in extreme circumstances terminating employment of officers who violate the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution protects all citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures from all government officials.
Survivors Support Group I am currently on the mental health track, so looking at a potential group that I might encounter would encompass female victims of domestic violence and abuse (DVA) which is also referred to as intimate partner violence (IPV) and rape or sexual assault victims (as statues vary depending on the states definition). Both forms of abuse stem from a power and control dynamic. The use of force during sex is not about sexual pleasure for the perpetrator, instead the pleasure comes from being in a position of power and having control over another human being. The act of hurting and demeaning the woman is the real pleasure. DVA/IPV consists of physical, sexual, emotional, and economic abuse.
Introduction There is an ongoing abuse of the zero-tolerance policy that continues to affect the lives of minority girls in schools in the public and private school sector. The current literature supports data that show that minorities are severely impacted by the policies. However, there is a gap in the literature that addresses the magnitude of how minority girls are impacted by these policies. Furthermore, due to the zero-tolerance policies, cultural differences are not even considered. Due to a lack of a universally accepted definition of zero tolerance, there are only estimates of the frequency of enforcement (Daly, Hildenbrand, Haney-Caron, Goldstein, Galloway, and DeMatteo, 2016).
“The idea was to use a cell phone to call Cohen’s landline, posing as Cohen’s teammate Dominic, using Dominic’s caller I.D. The call had been engineered from a remote computer by a squad member with prodigious hacking skills.” This part of the article clearly shows that the skills and hard work of each team member, is vigorously needed in order to make the team work well. It is important to acknowledge that there is a certain point where the game goes too far, such as kids possibly harming someone, or end up getting involved in an event that breaks the law.
In this case questioning workplace harassment in terms of sexual discrimination and its prevalence to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Joseph Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services distinguishes whether or not discrimination can occur within the same sex. Joseph Oncale, a male, filed a complaint against his employer, Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. The petitioner was working at one of respondent’s service stations and he was part of an eight men team. In the complaint, Mr. Oncale is alleging that he was sexually harassed by his co-workers John Lyons, Danny Pippen, and Brandon Johnson.
The exclusionary rule is a lawful principle that the United States use, which expresses that the confirmation that was powerfully utilized by the police can 't be utilized in a criminal trial. The motivation behind why this is done it’s for the security of the established rights. In addition, the exclusionary rule states that in the Fifth Amendment no one "should be denied of life, freedom, or property without due procedure of law." The exclusionary rule additionally expresses that in the Fourth Amendment it is intended to shield residents from unlawful pursuits and seizures. It also applies to the infringement of the Sixth Amendment, which ensures the privilege to counsel.
“People simply disappeared, always during the night. Your name removed from the registers, every record of everything you have ever done was wiped out, your one-time existence was denied and then forgotten. You were abolished, annihilated: vaporized was the usual word. ”-George Orwell, 1984, Book 1, Chapter 1. Formally called Enforced Disappearance as described in the quote above is still in play today.