Comparing Homosexual and Heterosexual Relationships
In relation to the comparison of heterosexual and homosexual relationship, Clarke et al. (2005) explored in their article of what occurs in relationships when there are unavailable ‘off-the-shelf’ roles. Gender difference is one issue that appears constantly in psychological analyses of heterosexual relationships.
A world in which gender differences are widely believed in is where heterosexual couples build their relationships in, which in turn are reflected in institutions and popular culture. Couples are judged, positioned and regulated both by others and by themselves, against and through these ideas about gender difference. However, many heterosexual couples report resisting these stereotypes
…show more content…
Many psychologists draw attention to the similarities between lesbian and gay and heterosexual relationships despite those obvious differences. Some lesbian and gay psychologists like Kitzinger & Coyle, (1995) have argued that a focus on similarities can be problematic, moulding lesbian and gay relationships into patterns (supposedly) typical of heterosexual relationships and therefore overlooking aspects that do not conform to this ideal. A focus on sameness can also lead to a failure to explore the marginalisation of lesbian and gay relationships in the wider society. The importance of gender differences and similarities is evident in research on the division of domestic labour in lesbian, gay and heterosexual relationships. Kurdek (1993) compared how lesbian, gay and married heterosexual couples allocate household labour. Kurdek identified three patterns of household labour allocation: equality, balance and segregation. Couples who allocate using the principle of equality do so by sharing household tasks and completing them together. Couples who allocate by balancing distribute tasks equally but specialise – one partner does the ironing, and the other does the …show more content…
Relatively few differences have been discovered, and most are rather small. Of the differences identified to date, some suggest that gay and lesbian partners are slightly better off than their heterosexual counterparts, while others imply that they are slightly worse off. One noted advantage of same-sex couples is that they are nicer and use more humour during arguments compared to heterosexual couples. This may have something to do with the fact that gay partnerships tend to have much greater equality (i.e., power-sharing) within their relationships, perhaps this is due to not adhering so strongly to traditional gender
Although not an exhaustive list, they do encompass most of the characteristics on which comparisons between homo and heterosexual couples can be made. However, I would have liked to see distributions of same sex couple based on their education level and their respective child adoption. Black et al. do provide data for education level, but they do not provide rates of adoption given educational level. I think it would be important to see this measure because it would allow us to examine whether lack of adoption had anything to do with education or that same-sex couple didn’t want to have kids---under the assumption that transaction cost are same for both types of couples Nonetheless, I would like to know how children in either environment performed overtime and whether we would face similar difficulties in collecting data since now same-sex marriage is legal because of which some of the costs that same sex couple face is
To understand the linkage between sexuality and gender, it is important to reimagine the relationship between sexuality and gender and the rapport they hold with self-identification. Not long ago, sexuality was tied to procreation - becoming the core of one’s identity. Gender had always been tied to biological sex. However, a crisis of gender identity emerged and blurred the gender and sexuality binaries that had become commonplace social facts. A fluidity was created that allowed individuals to not feel the pressure of fitting inside distinct identification categories.
The question of if and how this general pattern extends to same-sex families was then examined. Results proved that children in cohabiting households have poorer health outcomes than those in married households (Reczek, C., Spiker, R., Liu, H., & Crosnoe, R. 2016). Historically, we know married couples in the United States have more socioeconomic resources than cohabiting couples. After comparing different and same sex families, it was shown that some of the same sex families had limited access to valuable socioeconomic resources. This is mainly due to disenfranchisement, fear of homophobic treatment within the community, and discrimination specifically in the workplace (Reczek, C., Spiker, R., Liu, H., & Crosnoe, R. 2016).
Introduction In the Western world, majority of the movies are normally preoccupied with the notion of masculinity that depict men as being the dominant gender with roles requiring them to exhibit male behavior, such as providing for family and fighting, while the women the inferior gender with roles requiring them to exhibit female behavior, such as supporting the husband despite his shortcomings. Anne Lee in his modern Western movie Brokeback Mountain (IMDb, 2015) represents masculinity in different relationships: masculinity as depicted by men who want to be in a relationship with women and masculinity as depicted by men who want to be in the same-sex relationship. In this movie opinions divide significantly concerning masculinity especially when looking at Ennis and Jack who are two gay cowboys trying to be in a secret homosexual relationship. In what follows, we will examine the representation of relationships of traditional Western masculinity in the movie
Gender Roles: Interpreting The Opposite Sex In today’s society men and women are often expected to perform different tasks, and occupy different roles based on their sex. Within different cultures, the view of how women and men should act and interact varies with political and religious influences, as well as personal influences. Geoffrey Chaucer suggests that people’s ability to understand the opposite sex is divided because of the stereotypes set in society for the opposite genders. Women are more likely to work as secretaries, and men are likely expected to work as managers and executives in the working field.
Over time, the period saw a general upsurge in literacy rates. For example in France between 1680 -1780 literacy rose from 29% to 47% for men and from 14% to 27% for women. These figures can be interpreted as evidence of a lack of opportunity for women to become literate and this essay argues that gender difference was caused by the social restrictions placed on women within a largely patriarchal society. It suggests that printing did not necessarily have the same impact for women as it did for their male counterparts.
This treatment is still prevalent in today’s society unfortunately, although it has improved, the same themes of inequality in marriage is still there. Brady was able to express her thoughts and opinions from personal experience and made an emotional impact for readers.
The Civil Rights Movement gained traction around the 1950s, paving the way for many other oppressed groups. These groups fought for different rights, but they still had a similar struggle to the original movement. One of these groups is the Gay Rights Movement. The comparison between the black civil rights movement and the gay civil rights movement is “typically a sensitive subject, even among liberals” (Williams). Some people believe that it is unfair to compare a fight for marriage to a fight to gain equality in every aspect.
What are the varying explanations of men’s involvement in criminal activity? Savian Campbell University of Trinidad and Tobago CRIM2004 Gender and Crime Abstract This research paper is intended to analyse the various explanations for men’s involvement in criminal activity using a gendered approach. It looks at the masculinity of crime and seeks to answer the burning question that has been ignored for years (what is it about men that causes them to commit crime?) The notion of masculinity and the typical characteristics which are associated with it are discussed and a linkage between masculinity and crime is made.
As well, butch lesbians are homosexual, and do not participate in the same type of misogynistic existence as typical straight men. Butch lesbians do not have the same privilege of men, and are kept at a level of disrespect both based on gender and sexuality. Even though stereotypically, butch lesbians are seen as the ‘man’ in lesbian relationships, and expected to fulfill similar emotional and sexual duties. In reality, butch women as personal identities are the bane of heteronormativity, because masculine lesbains oppose traditional gender roles, and are gay. Though, this does not stop the heteronormative binary from existing, and prevailing over other forms of lesbian
Any analysis or understanding of any aspect of Western culture is incomplete and degraded if it does not incorporate a critical analysis of modern homo/heterosexual definition (Sedgwick 2008,
Furthermore, it is possible that in mixed-gender families, the higher chances of comparisons between the two parents’ behaviours would reinforce specific ideas about gender roles than it would in families where parents are of the same gender (Endendijk et al., 2013). For example, it is often assumed in mixed-gender households that males are breadwinners of the family while females are caretakers, whereas in same-gender households, parents tend to be more open-minded about gender roles and do not necessarily subscribe to existing stereotypes (Sutfin, Fulcher, Bowles, & Patterson, 2008). Division of roles in terms of gender
Using queerness as a lens of which to read Typical American by Gish Jen and David Henry Hwang’s M. Butterfly, one can begin to examine the layers of identity in the Western perception of Asians and Asian immigration to the U.S. Though these authors take differing approaches to discussing queerness—queerness is the subtext of Jen’s novel while it is the main focus of Hwang’s play—they both critique the heteronormativity and gender binary and queerness’ intersection with America. This essay will discuss the impact heteronormativity then character’s interactions with the concept of gender. Heteronormativity encompasses several issues these writers grapple with: compulsory monogamy and heterosexuality as the only option for relationships. On the
Introduction In this case study, it analyse how the concept of family has changed in the past 20 years as it will be depicting modern family forms and past norms. It is important to look at how families have developed throughout the years up until the 21st century as we compare the two and elaborate on the difference and what makes it so significant. In this case study, it contrast and compare the television series Modern family which is a 21st century concept of family and The Simpsons which was adapted 27 years ago and how things have changed with family dynamics and what is the norm now which was not the norm years ago.
However, studies show that household labor is more equally distributed at first, 4. But for those cohabiting couples who end up married, the majority of household work falls to the woman. B. Financial reasons are a factor.