The Roman Republic lasted from 509 B.C.E to 27 B.C.E. The Roman Republic was democratic, but not always. Such as when the wealthy took over, it was more difficult to become a Roman citizen, and there was a lot of division in the society. However it was still democratic because they let the majority of legal men vote, even the free slaves later on, the people had a voice, and everyone mainly had a job to do in order to help the community. The Roman Republic tried to be democratic, but then it led to it just being an aristocracy. At first they were democratic, “It is the people in the Assemblie who grant office to those that deserve it through the elections…and most important of all it is that they make the final decision on the question of …show more content…
Free slaves could also vote.” (Document B) Even though it was only the male citizens that could vote, it still made big changes for Rome. Also during that time women were taking care of the kids, and not having an education or job. So it makes sense for only men to vote back then, it was more fair that they let free slaves vote because technically that made them citizens. Relating to this,“slavery allowed many of the wealthy citizens to participate in the politics of running the empire. Slaves served a variety of functions. They are farmers, miners, domestic servants, entertainers and even teachers…unlike slaves of Greece, a Roman slave lived in a unique society: he could earn or buy his freedom…and enjoy the benefits of citizenship, gaining wealth and power.” This pushed the Roman Republic's democracy farther and made it more open to anyone. However, “The most fundamental of all rights of the people was, however, the fact that they, and they …show more content…
At this time it didn't matter about the division in society, “Even the poorest of Roman citizens, the proletarii, were still represented.” They used to not look down on the poor, but they used them to become a stronger and more productive community. Although they were fairly democratic in the beginning, whenever they expanded, it slowly began to change. “Once Roman territory had expanded…it was mostly the well-to-do rural voter and their clients who could afford the time and expense to come to Rome.” (Document C) By this time, it took more effort to vote since people were coming from all over to vote. Rome started to add limits, “How easily a small number of urban residents registered in a rural tribe could determine the vote of that tribe is clear from the small percentage of citizens who actually voted.” (Document C) This shows how little the number of people voted that were actually Roman citizens. The Roman Republic started to become an aristocracy whenever a lot more of the wealthy people came into power. “Controlled by the wealthiest
The Roman Republic was often known for its lasting influence for the development of Western political governance and ideals and is often hailed as a beacon of democracy in ancient history. But an in depth look reveals it to be more complex. While the Roman Republic held democratic elements that allowed citizen participation and representation, its political structure was ultimately characterized by a significant concentration of power among the elite and few for the average person. This essay will explore the extent of democracy within the Roman Republic, analyzing key aspects such as the electoral system, legislative bodies, and social hierarchy and the democratic nature and the implications it had on the overall governance of the state.
The Roman empire was based on slavery: slavery on a massive scale. Therefore The success and spoils of Roman wars meant that slaves were everywhere putting regular Roman citizens out of work. This solution was not ideal but no rich Romans (patricians) seemed willing to compromise and give up their slaves. Attempts were made to base taxes on the numbers of slaves owned but the rich simply freed their slaves to avoid taxation and then added on still to the numbers of unemployed.
Despite its name, the Roman Republic was actually quite a mix of both a republic and a democracy. This is said because they used a bottom-up system, allowing even the people with little roles to vote, such as The Assembly. They would vote for their leaders and laws, among other things, as well. One of the main factors in having a republic government is to not have the people involved in selecting leaders, but the Roman Republic did just that. A person cannot say that a republic is a republic if they allow the people to vote because having the people vote is a major part of democracy.
The citizens would elect Praetors, these were judges that ruled in the judicial branch and would be voted for each year(AR). Usually only the wealthy Praetors would be elected leaving out the middle and lower class citizens of Rome(AR).Today in The U.S., people can vote on issues that are addressed within America and are also able to vote on who is elected as the president no matter what financial state they are in. In Rome, the lower class citizens also known as the plebeians, were forced into the army and were furious at the fact that
The Roman Empire and Roman Republic were two distinct periods in the history of ancient Rome. The Roman Republic was established in 509 BC, following the overthrow of the Etruscan monarchy. It lasted until 27 BC when the Roman Empire was established under the rule of Augustus. One of the main differences between the Roman Republic and the Roman Empire was their form of government. The Roman Republic was a system of government where elected officials represented the people.
The Roman Republic was founded in 509 BC and lasted for nearly 500 years. During this time, Rome became a dominant power in the Mediterranean region, establishing a vast empire that lasted for centuries. However, the Republic itself was beset by internal conflicts, corruption, and a breakdown of the political system that eventually led to its downfall. One of the key factors that contributed to the Republic's decline was the breakdown of the political system. The Roman Republic was initially designed to provide a balance of power among different branches of government, including the Senate, the magistrates, and the people's assemblies.
In a representative democracy, citizens choose representatives to vote on laws and make political choices. In ancient Rome, many political leaders and historians claimed that the government was a democracy. However, Rome was never truly a democracy, due to their unfair government organization, and lack of democratic citizenship. In terms of government career holders, and as regular citizens, some groups of people were more powerful and privileged than others. To start off, the government of ancient Rome was far from democratic.
Democracy is what we call a formation of government where citizens and group of people can vote on laws. The Roman Republic did not have a well developed formation of their government but it did have the qualifications of democracy. There were pros and cons of voting in the Roman times such as anybody can vote. According to Professor Millar, he says, “Every adult male citizen, unless specifically disqualified, had a vote, and there was no formal exclusion of the poor. Free slaves could also vote.”
The Roman Republic was a representative democracy that evolved to address the changing nature of Roman society. It was founded in 509 BCE after the overthrow of the last Roman king, and it lasted for over 400 years. During that time, the Roman Republic expanded its territory, its population, and its power. It also faced several challenges, including civil wars, foreign invasions, and economic crises. Despite Rome’s founding on the principles of a republic, it struggled to fairly represent all its citizens.
Some people might argue that life in the Roman Republic was fair, but the really only look at the life of a plebeian, specifically the wealthier ones that had more free-reign on what they were allowed to do. The average plebeian’s life was pretty standard. Some plebeians were landlords, made baked goods to sell, worked on farms, fought in the military and one plebeian was picked out to be apart of the consul. As far as everyday life for a plebeian, they would usually work or go to school (depending on age), and then they would go home and have dinner, while the wealthier plebeians would go out to dinner parties. In general, plebeian life was pretty fair compared to other people's lives in the Rome
This was a slave-using area, however, they were not a slave-society. Rome, however, was a slave society. Slaves accounted for a large percentage of the population. The slaves would seek to do productive labor, which raised the wealth of the elite.
This proves that Rome managed their slaves harshly because they thought of their slaves as a tool. They treated them in such an inhumane manner. Slaves had no personal rights, and were considered “property” of their masters. Where they could be bought and sold, as well as part of the trade cycle. Slaves in Athens were treated a lot better compared to slaves in Rome.
Introduction The Roman Republic was established in 509 BCE, after a long struggle against kingship. The Roman Republic was characterized by elements of democracy, such as the election of officials and the creation of a representative government. However, the Republic was also marked by undemocratic practices, such as the exclusion of plebeians and women from political power. This paper will discuss the circumstances that led to the establishment of the Roman Republic, the democratic elements of the Republic, and the undemocratic practices that made the Republic questionable.
The term, Democracy, stems from the Greek word ‘demokratia’ which means rule by the people and it wasn’t until around 500 BCE in Athens where the first examples of democracy originated. While Athens is widely regarded as the first historical example of a democratic system, some scholars believe that the Roman Empire’s republic system was more democratic than that of the Greek. As I will come to
Introduction Ancient Rome was constituted of two classes, the patricians who were mostly the descendants of the aristocrats and the plebeians who descended mostly from the freed men or mostly immigrants. The two classes could unit to fight against the common enemy in order to protect the city. However, political power and the economic were in the hands of the patricians. Although they were the majority in ancient Rome, the plebeians were poor and had to worked the land of the rich patricians and some were even slaves to the patricians. Even though poverty put them into this state, they were still very important to Rome.