Ted Bradford and Jeramie Davis are two men out of many that have had their cases overturned my DNA evidence.
Ted Bradford served 14 years on a rape charge of a woman in her home with her baby. Bradford's case was the first case in Washington to be overturned by DNA evidence (Bristol). The case was overturned when a University Professor in Seattle, Washington, Jackie McMurtrie, tested the DNA found by the detectives from the Yakima County. This shows that there was a possibility that Bradford did not commit the crime. Yakima County prosecutors were praised by McMurtrie for agreeing to the testing of the DNA found on the mask left at the crime scene before the new law passed in 2005, preservation of DNA (Bristol). After a fact-finding hearing
…show more content…
Jeramie Davis served 5 years for the murder of an adult bookstore owner. Davis had been recently transferred from the Washington State Penitentiary in Walla Walla, serving a 40 year sentence for the beating and robbery of a bookstore owner, to the Spokane County Jail. Davis had told the police he was an innocent witness who went to Best Buy Adult Books and found the owner (Allen) dead on the floor. Police say that Davis waited about four hours before calling 911 for help. That Monday Davis was questioned and then released to be only brought back a few days later as the main suspect after two detectives (Tim Madsen and John Miller) kept investigating and found a witness who had information on the crime they didn't realize would be useful till then. This shows that they only ever looked at Davis as the perpetrator, not looking at any other suspect. As they looked more into Davis they found that the Washington court records had a criminal record on Davis for a driving offense and a conviction involving a scam. The only violence he had on his record was a violation of a restraining order. During the investigation the bat that was used to brutally beat the bookstore owner had DNA on it. When they tested the DNA it matched to a Julio J. Davila after his DNA was ran through the system for a different case. This shows that there is more than one suspect for the crime and they should have …show more content…
He denied knowing Allen or Davis and said he was confused on how his DNA ended up on the bat. Spokane detectives spoke to an informant who said they saw more than a dozen brand new pronographic videos that Davila was trading for drugs (Bannach). This shows that a witness saw Davila recently at the bookstore Allen owned near the time of the incident. As they looked more into Davila they found that he has a record dating back to 1992. Davilas record consisted of disorderly conduct in Los Angeles, domestic violence convictions in Kootenai, Santa Clara, and Spokane Counties. Davila was also convicted of a 2nd degree domestic violence burglary and 3rd degree assault in 2008. This shows that he would be capable to commit the murder and robbery of the bookstore owner. Connecting Davila to the case was done by the fact his DNA was already in the system that led them to match the DNA left on the bat. In order to be fully sure of the match, they got a second sample of DNA from Davila on June 27 confirming the match (Bannach). This shows that Davis was not the man who committed the crime. He was arrested in January for the murder while he was under the supervision of the Department of Corrections for a methamphetamine
Even when Michael’s new defense team, through the innocence project, found a crime that was eerily similar to the method of murder and subsequent events to the one that Michael was convicted of, the new prosecutor in Williamson County fought hard to keep DNA testing from taking place, even stating that they objected to the testing now because the defense hadn’t requested it before (Morton, 2014). There was further evidence of ineffectiveness in that the coroner who’d changed his estimated time of death between the autopsy and trial, had come under scrutiny for his findings in this case, as well as several others, with claims of gross errors “including one case where he came to the conclusion that a man who’d been stabbed in the back had committed suicide” (Morton, 2014). This was only one of the many injustices that were committed against Michael Morton throughout his trial. In August of 2006, the defense was finally granted permission to perform DNA testing on the items that had been taken from his wife’s body (Morton, 2014). Although this testing did not reveal any information about the guilty party, it did at least give Michael the knowledge that Chris was not sexually violated before or after her death (Morton,
None of the suspects were questioned by the police until at least 48 hours after it happened even though there were witnesses to the event. Henry Marrow was
Dennis Maher was arrested in November of 1983. He was charged with attempted rape and assault with a deadly weapon. He was walking down the street when he was stopped, searched and charged with possession of marijuana. Maher was then taken into the police station and held for questioning. The detectives asked him questions such as “what time did you get home, “where were you.”
I located the KPD Rape Case 15-27355 which identified a subject named Ricardo Oropeza-Quiroz (DOB 12-30-1993) as being contacted with Hicks. It was also determined that Oropeza-Quiroz was an involved party in KPD Hit and Run Case 15-22411. In the Rape case, Hicks and Oropeza-Quiroz were people of interest. That case is still under investigation.
The Death Penalty in Houston Texas a woman named Kayla Duncan once justice for kindhearted sister Allison Simmons who was brutally murdered with an ax in her home in Dallas Alison's husband claimed that he left his house to run a few errands and return to his home where he found his wife murdered after further investigation by the court Allison's husband Chase Simmons was found guilty for the murder of Allison Simmons Chase was a man with morals and from everyone the police talked to said they had gotten the impression that he was a good man after Kayla heard that Chase was guilty of murder of her sister Allison she took charge to try to get the court to reassess the case because she wanted Chase to be sentenced to the death penalty after the
Consequently, I and my family waited 17 days for a POSITIVE IDENTIFICATION. The days offered nothing short of excruciating pain with no remedy in place. I have since met with the Mayor 's Office and local reporters. Furthermore, I presented an oral testimony before DC Council members. I am working fervently not to have Malik known simply as D.C. 's 106th homicide.
In September of 1961, a woman from District of Columbia had an intruder break into her apartment. While the invader of the home was there, they had taken her wallet, and also raped the woman. During the investigation of the crime, the police had found some latent fingerprints in the apartment. The police then established and processed the prints. The prints were then connected back to 16 year old Morris A. Kent.
orensics expert have made many mistakes regarding handling and analyzing evidence. This has led to people being wrongly convicted. This had happened to Ray Krone. There have been experts such as Jacqueline Blake who broke protocol regarding evidence that led to wrongful convictions. Jacqueline Blake was a FBI lab employee who failed to complete negative control tests in about 90 different cases(Pyrek, 2010).
Charged in the murder of a local boxing legend, Tycorion Davis, 18, was arrested after a Crime Stoppers tip helped to put him behind bars. Former boxer O 'Neil "Supernova" Bell died as a result of a random street robbery, and police are seeking four men accused of his murder. The robbery occurred in southwest Atlanta after O 'Neil Bell stepped off a bus, right before the day of Thanksgiving. As a result of the robbery, Bell died when he attempted to fight back, and they left another person injured. Investigators of criminal law have called it an opportunistic crime, and police put out surveillance footage to solve the case.
”(2). For supporting his ex wife and their kids. During his trial he pleaded “Guilty” in Palm Beach County Circuit. Judge Dina Keever convicted him of “Second degree murder, and sentenced him to 50-56 years in prison. ”(2).
Crook was reported missing by her husband later the same day when he returned home from a short trip (Roper v. Simmons, 2005). Later the same day, fishermen discovered her body. Simmons was very self-satisfied with his murder and was more than happy to brag about it to his friends (Roper v. Simmons, 2005). He specifically told them that the killed a woman because she was able to identify him, referring to her as a bitch (Roper v. Simmons, 2005). By the next day, the police were made aware of what Simmons did, and arrested him at school.
In 1988, Harrison asked for a DNA test, which was done but testing at that time, came back with the results of unable to determine, being that the US had only been using it since 1986. (Justice) After have spent 15 years in prison, Clarence Harrison contacted a group named “The Innocent Project,” to take on his case to prove his innocence and was accepted.
Destiny Johnson LSTD 502 Criminal Law January 10, 2016 A. Research Paper Topic: Wrongful Convictions B. Law abiding citizens should not be wrongfully convicted of a crime that they did not commit. Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) was first used to aid a criminal investigation by Professor Jeffreys in 1986 for rapes/murders that occurred in the United Kingdom. The first DNA exoneration took place in 1989. Prior to DNA testing there were hundreds of wrongful convictions.
Since the founding of our judicial system there have always been individuals claiming innocence to a crime that they have been found guilty of, traditionally, after their sentencing no matter how innocent they may or may not be would have to serve, live and possibly die by the decision of their peers. The Innocence Project, founded in 1992 by Barry C. Scheck alongside Peter J. Neufeld faces this issue by challenging the sentencing of convicted individuals who claim their innocence and have factual ground to stand upon. The Innocence Project uses the recent advances in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) testing to prove their client’s innocence by using methods that were not available, too primitive or not provided to their clients during their investigation,
The Boston Strangler, whose real name was Albert DeSalvo, was arrested and charged in 1964 with the murder of over ten women in the Boston Area. While he was convicted and sentenced to life, there were still doubts about whether or not he was the actual killer, or if there were others involved. It was for this reason that the case of murder with one victim was left open, as there was not enough conclusive evidence to lay blame to DeSalvo. That evidence came almost 60 years later where, in 2013, the Boston Police department was able to close the case after using new DNA technology to identify DeSalvo as the killer. Up until this point, technology in sequencing and genomic testing was not nearly as advanced, but with the advent of the