Women in the 1600s to the 1800s were very harshly treated. They were seen as objects rather than people. They were stay-at-home women because people didn’t trust them to hold jobs. They were seen as little or weak. Women living in this time period had to have their fathers choose their husbands. Their fathers and husbands would use them as slaves, housewives, objects, etc. They were seen as property to their fathers and husbands. Once a father chose a husband for his daughter, her husband would basically own her. He would misuse and abuse her. During this time, people believed that women were only good at cooking, cleaning, or nurturing their children and couldn’t do much else. Because people thought this way, women were uneducated unless they were in the upper class. Wealthy women would sometimes have private tutors that would teach them. …show more content…
They were not allowed to serve in the military. They were not allowed to have any political opinions. If they did have an opinion, people disregarded it. An interesting example of this is when Abigail Adams, the wife of John Adams, started talking about women’s rights to her husband. Every time she mentioned something, he disregarded it. Women didn’t have many rights until later in the early 1800s. In conclusion I think that it was wrong of them to blatantly ignore what the women in society had to say and to treat them the way that they did. I think that they should have at least given women a chance to prove themselves, because we all know that women are just as capable as
Essentially, marriage in the 1700’s was seen merely as a means of birthing heirs and finding a way to financially support yourself, so it resulted in both men and women being devalued. It is universally known that women were often treated as inept and helpless rather than sophisticated people with autonomy and capabilities. In fact, during this time, “married women were consistently compared with minor children and the insane-- both categories of people considered incapable of caring for themselves. To marry a woman was, in one sense, to ‘adopt’ her-- or at least to adopt responsibility for all the circumstances of life with which she entered the marriage” (Teachman 39). Furthermore, when women got married, they would legally cease to exist.
“Her domain was the household, the garden, and the henhouse, and her days were spent processing the raw materials her husband produced into usable items such as food, clothing, candles, and soap (page6).” As known by many, women during the 17th century were to maintain their households for their husbands. By the 18th century they were expected to not only maintain a household, but to take care of their families and be proper women. Then by the late 18th century women's roles changed completely to having to be a surrogate father, and main provider. The roles of women during this time period changed drastically in such short periods of times.
It’s no secret that a gender norm for women was that they had to be completely subservient to men, or more accurately their husbands. For example the “Diversity in colonial times” article states, “Colonial cultural norms reflected European patriarchal values, which became embedded in English law. For example, a woman’s marriage automatically transferred the legal ownership of the bride’s personal property—money, land, household goods, and clothing—to her husband. If he died, the property went to the children, not her, with male heirs receiving larger inheritances than their sisters. Even children could become the wards of the father’s male relatives and not of his widow.
In the seventeenth century Chesapeake women had different roles than other colonial women. Chesapeake women were expected to work in the house, raise their kids and work with their husbands in the “tedious care of tobacco plants.” (page 13) Unlike in the English society, they lacked a sense of “housewifery” due to the fact that they had the lack of spinning wheels and churns. (page 13) Since mortality rate was so high it was excepted of not just men but especially women to marry multiply time.
Before women had gotten the vote, it was difficult for all women. They had no say in what was done or where they would work or even where they would live. They would be left out in the dark if something were to happen like their husband separating from
A Woman’s Role During the 19th century, most of American society’s gender roles were dictated by the Cult of Domesticity, or the Cult of True Womanhood. This was a set of virtues which described the “ideal” or “True” woman - one that “upheld four main principles: piety [being religious], purity [protecting her virginity], submissiveness [dependent on her husband, yet offering him love and affection], and domesticity [doing housework].” To follow
Women played an inferior role compared to men in society in the 1600s and 1700s. Yes, women have been considered the weaker gender for generations way before then. One of the characteristics we have seen that Europeans classified Native Americans as savages was their “barbaric idea” of gender equality. In those times colonial women had few career choices if any. Men were greater than women during that time and that is why it was rare to find an unmarried woman.
How this affected them? It affected them that their life was always miserable a lot of people lost faith and they were always afraid. Also problems they can get seriously. This happened to Harriet Tubman. There was a slave that was getting hurt and she tried to protect him.
People often made decisions for women, instead of women thinking for themselves. This present day, women are treated more fairly. There is a wide range of jobs open to everyone, and some men might be the ones staying at home watching the kids. Yes, almost 8 decades later, women have a right to talk, and can follow their dreams, without being wrongfully treated for their
Women also no rights over property, and no way of initiating a divorce. Only men at that could ask for a divorce, in which men were always given custody of the children. The other argument here is that women do not are disenfranchised from offering their skills to society. As the document points out nearly half the population was not being allowed to
Especially in that time, women were not treated as equals in many circumstances. Women are also set a standard to be ladies, doing things such as wearing dresses and not playing outside like males are allowed to. A quote in To Kill a Mockingbird states, “Miss Maudie on a jury would be impressive. I thought of old Mrs. Dubose in her wheelchair- ‘Stop that rapping, John Taylor, I want to ask this man something.’ Perhaps our forefathers were wise.”
A Woman’s Journey Through Misogyny In the late 1800s and early 1900s, the stereotypical roles of women were to tend to the house and to their children. They had little to no freedoms, and their husbands controlled practically every aspect of their lives. These stereotypes created a patriarchal society where men were superior to women. This was the social standard of the time period, but this would not be the case for long.
Also, college was only an option for men because women were supposed to marry and have kids, not go to college. It was thought of as a waste for women to go to college because they did not need an education to become a housewife. It was very much frowned upon
Women were subject to a wide-ranging discrimination that marked them as secondary citizens, which is what gilderlehrman.org says. “She had no right to own property in her own name or to pursue career of her choice.” In addition, the article states, “Women could not vote, serve on juries, or hold public office.” Women didn’t have any rights that they wanted and were mostly not allowed to do anything which is unfair. A married woman had no separate legal identity from that of her husband.
A woman back then would not be able to imagine having as much freedom as a women have now. Women back then were pretty much property. Women were seen as inferior to men and depending on the social class of the women, they had different “jobs” that they had to do. Women of poor households were expected to