Thomas J. DiLorenzo’s book, The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, his Agenda, and an Unnecessary War, is about the real truth behind Abraham Lincoln and his actual agenda during his involvement in the upcoming America. The Real Lincoln “contains irrefutable evidence that a more appropriate title for Abraham Lincoln is not the Great Emancipator, but the Great Centralizer.” (xiii). DiLorenzo’s book examines the effects of Abraham Lincoln’s real intentions pertaining to political and economic purposes. In addition, the book also focuses on his true intentions toward slavery as well. “… Lincoln’s views on race were consistent with those of the overwhelming majority of white Northerners, who discriminated against blacks…” (4). DiLorenzo …show more content…
In this specific Proclamation, it was NOT at all for slavery, it was a war measure. “In a letter to his Treasury Secretary Salmon P. Chase, he admitted that the original proclamation had no legal justification, except as a military measure.” (37). It was also a way to continue trade with the Europeans because of their recent decision in abolishing slavery. The Europeans would not agree with Lincoln’s real agenda, being to continue slavery, so he used the Emancipation for that purpose as well. “Lincoln understood that the European powers, who had recently abolished slavery peacefully, would balk at trading with and otherwise supporting the Confederacy if he introduced emancipation as one purpose of the war.” …show more content…
It then discusses the “Waging War on Civilians”. By many supporters of Lincoln, he is looked at highly of saving the Constitution. But, many don’t know the details behind that. Lincoln went through the necessary devils to accomplish the saving of the constitution. A quote that states, “He supposedly had to destroy constitutional liberty in order to save it.” (5). Lincoln broke the rules by having a military invasion without consent of congress. He went through with this action without thought of what was righteous about it the effect. Lincoln led the government to a bad way to rule. “… Lincoln led the way in subverting constitutional government in America.” (6). He also was the reason for ending international connection. “… Lincoln administration established another ominous precedent by deciding to abandon international law and the accepted moral code of civilized societies and wage war on civilians.”
The book shows that America had a president that was willing to do whatever was needed do to get this country shaped how it should be and stand by what the founding fathers stated, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” After President Lincoln had achieved victory in the exhausting Civil War on the Friday of April 14, 1865 Washington, D.C. 3:30 P.M, President Lincoln said, "Crook," Abraham Lincoln says to his bodyguard, "I believe there are men who want to take my life. And I have no doubt that they will do it." Reword Although President Lincoln probably knew these consequences before the end of the war, he still knew that he what he had to do. President Lincoln risked his life to change the course of history and ultimately paid the price.
Lincoln's views were consistent with most of Northerners, those of them who discriminated against free blacks. Even Abraham’s home state, Illinois was prohibiting the emigration of blacks into the northern states (4). The racial equality issues were a war itself within the states. However, a war was not necessary to free the slaves (9). But, that is not the only war Abraham Lincoln had started.
With all of the books written about President Lincoln, one might believe that there is nothing more to learn about this great man. However, Doris Kearns Goodwin wanted to show an unconventional analysis of Mr. Lincoln and how he used politics to his advantage. Three well educated men with similar backgrounds were compared alongside Abraham Lincoln who was considered to be much less educated and unqualified for the position. This trio of officials was astounded when Lincoln won the election. Over time and years of working together, the four of them had become friends and respected each other.
In America during the Civil War, people were killing their brothers based on their allegiance. Everybody during that time did not believe that the effects it may have after the war was over. Abraham Lincoln, the 16th president of the United States, knew about these effects, through enlightenment thinkers such as John Locke. Lincoln speech “Gettysburg Address” not only gives hope to the union soldiers but, something much more. He believes that the union will win the war against the south because of the dedication that both the government and the people have done through the use of allusion, ethos and antithesis
In Thomas J. DiLorenzo’s book, The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War, DiLorenzo writes about who Lincoln was, what his attentions were during his presidency and the people that Lincoln got ideas from to use while in office. DiLorenzo points out the flaws of Abraham Lincoln throughout the book. “The Real Lincoln contains irrefutable evidence that a more appropriate title for Abraham Lincoln is not the Great Emancipator, but the Great Centralizer” (xiii). Many people who watch politicians, and their debates can see that they will say and do whatever it takes to get support from the public and Lincoln did just this (10). Politician’s jobs depend on the support they receive.
’s Thesis was centered around the idea that Lincoln viewed emancipation as “a goal to be achieved through prudential means, so that worthwhile consequences might result.” He argued that every gradual step Lincoln took towards the abolition of slavery was done to “balance the integrity of ends with the integrity of means,” to accomplish this while still placing the constitution above all of his personal opinions. Guelzo then presented and answered four questions that he believed arose as a result of his prudence argument; why is the language of the Proclamation bland, did the Proclamation actually do anything, did the slaves free themselves, and finally did Lincoln issue the Proclamation to only to prevent European intervention or inflate Union morale? In response to the first, Guelzo makes the point that the Proclamation was a legal document, and that “every syllable was liable to… legal
Before he fought for the Senate seat in Illinois and before he was elected President of the United States of America, Abraham Lincoln was merely a man from Illinois who cultivated a set of beliefs and morals that would guide him and his country through one of the most difficult times in its history. One of the most revered presidents in American history, Lincoln emancipated southern slaves and lead his country through a civil war. It was his responses to the Dred Scott case and Senator Douglas and his debates throughout the 1850’s that helped shape the type of president, he would become. Lincoln recognized the burgeoning divide in American society just prior to the Lincoln-Douglas debates and addressed this disunion in order to garner the attention
He asked his listeners if the nation was to become endangered, would it sprout from overseas or from within the nation. He was referring to the mobs and others going against the laws of the nation. In the Lyceum Address, Lincoln went on to say that if danger “ever reach us it must spring up amongst us,” and that “we must ourselves be its author and finisher”. He thought that “as a nation of freemen, we must live through all time, or die by suicide”. Lincoln believed that if the nation continued on its destructive path by ignoring the rule of law, the nation in return would destroy itself.
You can see this in Document B, wherein 1858 Lincoln says this: “I have no purpose . . . to interfere with the institution of slavery in the states where it exists . . .” Later on in the same document he also states, “There is no reason in the world why the negro is not entitled to all the natural rights . . . in the Declaration of Independence- the rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” While Lincoln was running for president, he promised to leave slavery alone in the South, but he also stays true to his personal morals through his time, that slavery
With this being said, President Abraham Lincoln was one of the few who kept the nations ongoing insecurity of slavery in mind. Knowing that there were still Americans throughout the Union that still preferred slavery but neglected their preferences for the sake of the Union. In light of the president’s presumptions on the focused intentions of the civil war, we observe the thoughts of Americans on the topic of slavery in the 1860’s. From the New York Harold in 1862, “what to Do with the Slaves when Emancipated,” the article reveals, “The policy of the abolitionists would be destructive: That of the President is benign.” Because this article presented by Northerners argues that the removal of slavery would harm the nation and provide further logic on why African Americans should be kept as slaves averting the possibility of whites performing the slave’s
We saw Lincoln as a savvy strategist, a man of great depth who could out-think and out-maneuver his opponents in a way that made him self-assured in his own ability to secure the ends he desired. Lincoln held strong moral convictions about right and wrong, and was not shy about pursuing them. To Lincoln, the end result was everything, and he was willing to achieve his outcome through almost any means. In our opinion, this pursuit of ends by any means was Lincoln’s most distinctive guiding philosophy. It made him a force, but someone who could only be trusted when his goals aligned with yours.
President Abraham Lincoln, in his inaugural address, addresses the topic of the civil war and its effects on the nation and argues that America could be unified once more. He supports his claim by using massive amounts of parallel structure and strong word choice. Lincoln ‘s purpose is to contemplate the effects of the civil war in order to unite the broken America once again. He adopts a very hopeful tone for his audience, the readers of the inaugural address and others interested in the topic of American history and the civil war.
President Lincoln stated that: “if I could save the Union without freeing any slave, I would do it,..., and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone, I would do it.”. This quote clearly shows that the freedom of slaves was not his concern and unnecessary if it did not help the Union; as the result, slavery still exists if there is no war. Free slave from bondage should be a Great Emancipator’s primary goal and he will do his best to achieve it no matter what, but president Lincoln’s thought differed from that because all he cares was the Union. Although he had many times admitting himself an anti-slavery but his words and thoughts obviously prove that he is
Guelzo proposes in his essay that Lincoln intended on abolishing slavery and completed this by signing the Emancipation Proclamation, crediting the Emancipation Proclamation as the most revolutionary pronouncement ever signed by an American president. He supports his thesis by compiling different evidence and
This proclamation was issued to help end slavery, as Mr. Lincoln believed that slavery was very wrong. The Emancipation Proclamation did not end slavery right when it was issued, as many people think, however the emancipation proclamation,"did not free all slaves in the United States. Rather, it declared free only those slaves living in states not under Union control." (pbs) The final document of the Emancipation Proclamation took effect on January 1, 1863.