Task 1
In comparison, these texts have similar language; however, there are few differences in terms of language. For the most part, texts do not have abbreviations and contractions. However, the second text is more informal since it has common words as think, true, and good. They are imprecise and common words and often used in colloquial language. On the other hand, the first text has few filler words such as well, I mean, sort of and kind of. In addition, there are philosophical and scientific words located in the text. Particularly: Homo sapiens, theories, relativity, existence, and purpose. Nevertheless, it is problematical to call these words as jargon, since it is widely used by students to experts. Sentence length in these texts are
…show more content…
For the reason is that I am an atheist who relies on proven facts and critical thinking. In the text, the author wrote that “teaching each other stories that can be said to be false like the idea of God.” This proves that Kris Notaro (the author) also does not believe in religion. The main reason I have faith in critical thinking and the scientific method is that facts and evidence can verify them. Further, he also states, “Things can work completely out of tune, but can also work as intended”. With good judgment, one may agree with the author that sometimes it can go sour.
In conclusion, two texts are alike with slight differences such as formality and filler words. The first article is an informal language with jargon and few filler words. On the other side, the second article is more informal due to filler and everyday words. However, these two texts have similarities as sentence length, no abbreviations, and contractions. In all due fairness, I consider the first article as interesting to read. In as much as I am interested in science and I agree with the author.
Task
…show more content…
The language is formal since it uses advanced words such as circuitous, inference, sensory and abstract. In addition, he uses the personal pronouns in his article. For example, we believe another much more abstract thing. He also uses various methods to convince and make an impact on receivers. Further, he uses repetition we believe and contrasts between two information we believe. The contrast is between figurative and abstract ideas such as “that it will get dark later” and “that it is wrong to steal”. However, he does not have any rhetorical questions in his text. He does not include ethos or ethical appeal in the text, but his job or status can affect it. Pathos and logos are the two appeals that he uses in his extract. The logical appeal is when he gave us examples such as, “it is unlikely that an individual would be willing to die for a belief that she didn’t have any good ground to
First off, both texts are based around immigration. The text, “Deportation at Breakfast,” is described
I do not plan to use these two sources as heavily as the others but they are crucial for giving context to these newspaper
So, in summary, there are some differences in the way the to authors use science fiction details to develop the
While the writing styles of the two authors differ tremendously these two themes play a large part of the dialogue of
In both of the texts we are able to see the theme of the
Thus, the dichotomy between the targeted audience of the two texts is made
But, they are both written in divergent ways, causing the reader to learn the information
In the first text it focusses more on her and how she helped get women rights. This differs from the other because it shows that it didn’t waste much time to start telling you what she did. It also has a lot more of the things that she did compared to the second one. This effects it because we can’t know how she helped
Both texts are verisimilitude to
At the core of each story lies a strong sense of the human condition, but the ways in which this theme is presented differs between the two texts. The use of intricate character development in S. allows readers the chance to build up a relationship
Although both authors are trying to portray the same idea, they have very different ways of expressing
One was a historical article that had many facts, while the poem was missing important information. It is always important to read more than one piece of text on the same topic if you want to find out if something true or
Despite their commonalities, like the fact that they are both a response for someone seeking advice in love, each text uses the resources that fit them better in order to do so. They differ in text
The similarity between the two authors text structure is the use of an anecdote to begin. The difference is the different analogies given in thought. The corresponding use of vocabulary is the word choice of idioms used by both authors. The dissimilarity is the different choice of vocabulary throughout the text. The homogenous use of data and details are persistent all through the concept of production.
The first text is from the Library of Congress, which usually means that the language in the text is more formal and complex than other texts. The tone in the text is neutral and serious. The text is like an encyclopedia, which means the text must be factual and informative, but at the same time objective. That make text one completely opposite of text two, which is an autobiography by Arnold Schwarzenegger. His intension with text two is to motivate other immigrants to give back to America, which makes his language simple and less formal than the first text.