Operation Anaconda Essay

2

Operation Anaconda Case Study

Operation Anaconda took place in Afghanistan in 2002. The goal of the operation was to eliminate al-Qaeda and Taliban forces in the Shahi-Kot Valley and was consisted of United
States military, coalition forces, and Afghan militias. This essay will analyze the significant events of Operation Anaconda, focusing on the principles of mission command and how they were utilized to achieve the operational objectives (Kugler, 2007). The operation began on
March 2, 2002, with United States forces being air assaulted in the valley. However, the operation incurred significant challenges from the start of the mission. The terrain was very difficult, with mountainous landscape and narrow valleys that made it challenging

Initially, communication challenges between ground and air forces led to delays in CAS missions (Tertrais, 2019). However, as the operation continued to play out, information sharing and communication improved coordination between ground and air assets.
When the United States ground troops initially landed in the valley, they immediately came under unexpected heavy enemy fire. The leaders and commanders on the ground had to adapt quickly to an unexpected situation. Because of mission command, the ground forces were able to quickly assess the situation and rely on their tactics as well as their expertise to support the commanders intent. Mission command is crucial for mission success and decentralized decisions for subordinate units.
A major flaw in the operational planning was the utilization of indirect fire assets. The lack of indirect of fire suppression on the enemy played another role in the adaptation of the ground forces. The commanders and leaders that were developing the plan should have air

4 assaulted howitzers to support the friendly forces. Because of the lack of indirect fire

During Operation Anaconda’s harsh combat environment, the subordinate’s commanders and leaders were able to rely on their expertise and situational awareness to allow them to make the necessary orders on the battlefield.
The mission command idea is based upon principals including competence, mutual trust, shared understanding, commanders intent, mission orders, disciplined initiative, and risk acceptance. Operation Anaconda showcased the significance of applying mission command principles in complex and challenging environments. Although the initial battle plan faced setbacks, the ability to adapt, integrate joint assets and improve allowed coalition forces to achieve their objectives. These experiences underscored the importance of flexibility and collaboration in overcoming obstacles. The lessons learned from Operation Anaconda contributed to enhancing joint coordination and mission command in future military operations.

5

References

Kugler, R. L. (2007). Operation anaconda in Afghanistan: A case study of adaptation in battle.
DTIC. Retrieved from