Questions And Answers On Renewing The Sectional Struggle

982 Words4 Pages

Chapter 18: Renewing the Sectional Struggle (Pg. 337) Why did the issue of the status of the Mexican Cession cause such ominous debate? The issue of the status of the Mexican Cession caused such ominous debate because it raised anew the issue of extending slavery into the west, views on this were separated by the north (anti-slavery) and south (pro-slavery). Sectional Balance and the Underground Railroad (Pg. 341) What was the political status of the south in 1850? Why was the South worried about the status of the Mexican Cession? What issues involving Texas territory, the District of Columbia, and runaway slaves brought resentment between southerners and abolitionists? The political status of the south in 1850 was Zachary Taylor was in the White House so it boosted a majority of southerners in the cabinet and Supreme Court. The southerners were rising in power. The South was worried about the status of the Mexican Cession because they wanted to keep the balance between slave and free states and the fat of California could establish a precedent for the rest of the Mexican Cession. The issues involving Texas territory, the District of Columbia, and runaway slaves which brought resentment between southerners and abolitionists were the loss of slaves at the Underground Railroad, …show more content…

Clay proposed named defended a series of compromises and urged that the North and South both make concessions and the North should enact a more feasible slave law. Calhoun wanted to leave slavery alone, return runaway slaves, give the South it's rights, and restore political balance. Webster thought people should not legislate on the topic of slavery and the compromise, concession, and sweet reasonableness would provide the only solutions. To them keep the union to nether was more important than the issue of

Open Document