Contrary to the expectations of many individuals in the United States, race and ethnicity are not the same. Although both race and ethnicity are connected in the fact that both are socially constructed in modern times, race and ethnicity did not originate under similar circumstances. Race is more concrete and not dynamic, ultimately causing one’s race to be solidified in an individual’s early stages of development in society. Race was originally created in order to oppress certain individual’s in society and allow one group of individuals to be seen as superior and other groups as inferior, thereby proliferating oppression and establishment of distinctions between the in-group and the out-group. Race was not created as a way to understand the …show more content…
Unlike race, ethnicity is a way for us to comprehend individuals in the out-group. Ethnicity is more specified in order to understand the differences between groups, thereby increasing our group comprehension of other’s differences. There are many facets to ethnicity that is included and discussed in Joane Nagel’s Constructing Ethnicity: Creating and Recreating Ethnic Identity and Culture. In this piece, Nagel discusses the concept of ethnicity, stating “ethnicity is constructed out of the material of language, religion, culture, appearance, ancestry, or regionality” (152-153). This exemplifies Nagel’s overarching idea: ethnicity is fluid; it is able to change among different circumstances for the individual and for the group, usually in order for the individual or group to benefit in those specific situations. This is due to the fact that, despite ethnicities origin, it is still possible to discriminate against an individual through their ethnicity. Therefore, through its fluidity, individuals of the out-group may utilize the changing ethnic borders and boundaries in order to become the in-group and not be discriminated against. Thus, ethnicity is able to present social issues depending on the structure of society and group formation. Ethnicity is a double-ended sword: it is fluid and allows individuals to choose their …show more content…
In group and out-group distinctions are made through ethnic boundaries, which Nagel describes as a mechanism to “determine who is a member and who is not” (154). Nagel writes further how there are a number of studies that show that, despite the fluidity in ethnic boundaries, there is a maintenance or increase in ethnic identification, specifically among whites (154). This is contrary to the expectations of many individuals in society, since many believe that increasing fluidity will decrease and break many ethnic boundaries, thereby decreasing in-group identification and establishing a practice of non-group formation. This dichotomy of ignoring ethnic boundaries while identifying to an in-group is rooted through the mechanism in which we form fluidity in our ethnic identity. Nagel also writes on how our ethnic identity is formed through our own perceptions of ourselves and the perception others have on us, thereby showing that our identities “depend on partly where and with whom the interaction occurs” (155), usually to avoid negative outcomes. For instance, the DACA act allows individuals who are born in the US and whose family came illegally to defer deportation and get work permits in order to stay in the US. Unfortunately, there is a stigma against these individuals in education and in the workplace, causing many of these individuals to conform to the standards of the US due to
Many individuals like Ruiz struggles to achieve far, for they are highly monitored and given little to no opportunity to thrive toward the American dream. All the above happens simply because the majority has no intention to accept a different ethnicity,
Everyday the future in America looks brighter for the issues dealing with race and identity. Brave souls are not letting racism, class discrimination, or sexism hold them back anymore. Furthermore, the fight for a balanced society that pushes for equality is on the horizon. As we close on an era, based on purely the skin of the person, we need to analyze the impacts of the Ethnicity paradigm and Class paradigm on politics of the 20th century. Race and Ethnicity are used interchangeable in everyday conversation, however; they are not the same.
Racial formation is the process by which humans classify other human beings based on what they look like and where they come from. To racialize someone is to categorize someone; however, race is not natural, and is in actuality a product of sociohistorical processes. Because racial classifications are manmade, it is pivotal to consider the context and time period of racial systems because they change with history. They are a social construction rather than a biological reality, meaning they can be created, destroyed, and transformed. These processes can be observed when we look at how the Irish, who were initially subject to intense racial discrimination, adopted “whiteness,” or how the Chinese, who were also limited to strenuous physical labor, became the model minority.
Between the World and Me, written by Ta-Nehisi Coates is a powerful book written as a letter from the author to his teenage son. This book outlines the race issue in America from a first hand perspective. The author explains his struggles and fears as he grew up and how those fears transformed into a new meaning as he reached adulthood. Through his personal story, the reader is offered insight into the lives of other African Americans and how they may experience racial injustice themselves.
Fall 2015-Soc 100-35W 10/15 Week Seven Discussion Samantha Henry Sociologist argue that race is a social construct and not a part of our innate natural behavior. Then why is racial identification so prevalent in modern day society? That’s because at young ages we are taught by television, movies, books, newspapers, parents, teachers, friends and other sources what race is.
One law that affected immigrants was the immigration act of 1996 (Mandell & Schram, pg. 296). A second law that caused “panic in the immigrant community, was the personal responsibility act” (Mandell & Schram, pg. 296). California proposition 227 was intent on “eliminating bilingual education across the country” (Mandell & Schram, pg. 307). Proposition 209 was also another act that impacted affirmative action.
In Appiah's essay "Racial Identities" the author illustrates the point that just because an individual's extrinsic appearance looks as though he or she should belong to a certain group of people it is ultimately up to them to choice their identity. His principal and abiding concern is how we as individuals construct ourselves in a language with the social condition in a persons everyday life. Appiah analyzes the convolution of this process of individuals forming into one identity, emphasizing the opportunities as well as the dangers for self-creation in today’s a culturally mixed world. Appiah’s critique of these large collective identities (whites, Africans, African Americans, and Hispanics) aren't designed to deny their legitimacy but to
The first discussion of this course we have covered, we learned race is a social construction. According to Snip, he explained why he believes that race is a social construction; he argued that race is being used to pursue social class and political desires. Throughout the history race has changed from time to time. In the context of the United State race was used for assigned people based on their skin color then it become matter of personal identification. The book explains the concept of race, as this “Racialization is the social process by which a racial group identity is attached to a group and that is placed in a race-based social hierarchy.”
Race and ethnicity are two terms which are used interchangeably in every day conversation, however, there is a distinction between the two. Race is a categorization of people who have been singled out as inferior or superior, often on the basis of phenotype – observable physical characteristics such as skin color, hair texture, eye shape, or other selective attributes. Race is a social construct and has been known to change with historical and political events. Contrarily, ethnicity does not necessarily provide visual clues, instead, ethnicity is categorized on the basis of a shared common culture and includes elements such as language, norms, customs, religion, music, art, literature. Ethnic Groups are developed by their unique history
Some vital end results of social identity and self categorization include stereotyping, prejudice and conflict (Tajfe & Turner, 2004). That is, as the identity groups engage in in-group, the out-group members are likely to be discriminated. The formation of sub-groups (“us” versus “them”) within an organization due to demographics diversity may pose
Ethnic Notions: Divided From The Start The film 'Ethnic Notions ' illustrates various ways in which African Americans were impersonated during the 19th and 20th centuries. It follows and shows the development of the rooted stereotypes which have generated bias towards African Americans. If a film of this kind had such an affectionate influence on me, it is no surprise people adopted these ideas back then. The use of new and popular media practices in those days was more than adequate in selling the black inferiority to the general public.
Racial identity plays a role in the physical and psychological features of humans. Physically, humans in different parts of the globe endure different conditions and environments. Humans adapt to their environments and obtain different physical traits, henceforth, these physical traits have become adjacent to race. Psychologically, ancestral prejudices and influences throughout history have lingered through the generations and have impacted modern racial identities and tensions. Ethnic conflicts of the past such as the Social Darwinist theory of a "superior race" are morally refuted in current times, but that assumption had a brunt impact in which the world is still repairing today.
Race, nationality and ethnicity Race and ethnicity are seen as form of an individual’s cultural identity. Researchers have linked the concept of “race” to the discourses of social Darwinism that in essence is a categorization of “types” of people, grouping them by biological and physical characteristics, most common one being skin pigmentation. Grouping people based on their physical traits has lead in time to the phenomenon of “racialization” (or race formation), as people began to see race as more of a social construct and not a result or a category of biology.
Race is defined as the categorization of individuals based on their physical characteristics, i.e. skin color, facial structure, etcetera. Ethnicity is defined as the categorization of individuals based on their respective social or cultural groups, and is not based upon race. Both race and ethnicity are similar systems of categorization, yet, although race is on the basis on physical features while ethnicity is based on one’s social or cultural background. The concept of race was created by European imperialists and colonialists during the early 17th century, when the slave trade began. The white imperialists needed a system of categorization in order to justify the sharp uptick in the use of the African body as slaves.
In simple terms, different identity groups such as those whose languages, religions education-levels, genders, and ethnics come together, they create a diverse