1. Larry Ingram is the CEO of a distribution company and Scott Patterson is a sales person for perfect solutions. Ingram is one of Patterson’s top distributors for Perfect Solution products. Ingram came to find that Patterson gave lower prices to another distribution company called Barber distributing. Patterson lies and says that he gave the same deal, when in actuality he didn’t. In the end, Ingram feels that if Patterson gave them a deal, it’s only right to give his company a deal as well, and if he didn’t, he would take his business to Dymotzue Company, a competitor to Patterson’s company. Ingram asked Patterson for a deal of 2 truckloads of the product Bond-do-Perm, and Patterson lies and says he can get it by the end of the month or even for free. Knowing before the conversation he made a phone call to the manufacturer who told him the products will not be available for two months. He then offers a free product, knowing it’s only for those who are new customers. Patterson feels pressured …show more content…
If I were Scott Patterson, there would be nothing best but to tell the truth. I would tell Ingram that I gave Barber Distributing a deal and I would explain why I gave them a deal. Also, if it was possible to give Ingram a deal I would. I would also explain to Ingram, that our company manufacturer is delayed for 2 month because of defective products and we would offer the new product after every item is in the clear. In this situation I would be a conventional salesperson. I make the best decisions based on the rules and guidelines of the company.
3. If I were Larry Ingram, I would most likely go with the Dymotzue Company. Although Perfect Solutions has been my partner for ten years, the lies that Patterson told could cause problems for my company in the long-run. I would not trust Patterson, and trust is one of the key points when having business relationships. If I cannot rely on him, and he continues to lie, in the end my business will end up with nothing but
-Summary Timothy Mitchell, father of 5 and a residence of Sault Ste Marie who is trying suing the Sault Ste. Marie Police Services Board. His claim is that during an arrest one of the officers, Keating who was detaining him had used unnecessary force. Mitchell had been struck by Keating near his left upper abdomen. During his hims time at the police station Mitchell claimed that Keating said “abuse, provocative and demeaning comments” and that Keating also pushed him from behind while sitting on a bench in a cell and as he left Keating he gave a “rude and abusive gesture to Mitchell”.
Summary of Source The editorial discloses the power that the Court adheres to and whether it should be accountable for the decision making of fugitive slaves. The writer had discussed that in no way did the verdict of the Dred Scott case follow an act of law, but was merely “nullity.” During the settlement, they decided that since Dred Scott’s master had brought him on free land in Missouri or of the United States without having a citizenship, which resulted in him having no case. It continues on to say that the jurisdiction of the case was influenced by opinion, which did not involve any legalities.
A Case Analysis of the Scott Sisters Jamie and Gladys Scott, infamously known as the Scott Sisters, were convicted for organizing an armed robbery of two African American men in Mississippi after three male alleged accomplices testified against them in exchange for a plea bargain. The armed robbery netted a grand total of eleven dollars, and there were no reported injuries during the attack. The Scott sisters were found guilty and were sentenced to “two consecutive life sentences” for armed robbery (Austin & Irwin, 2012).
Biographical information Michael T. Slager Born: November 14, 1981 Place of Birth: Florida Walter Lamar Scott Born: February 9, 1965 Place of Birth: North Charleston, SC Location of Crime: North Charleston, South Carolina Date of Crime: April 4, 2015 Summary of the case Police officer Michael T. Slager from South Carolina was charged with using excessive force against an innocent motorist and killing him. The defendant pleaded guilty in a federal court in Charleston, South Carolina (Blinder, 2016).
Introduction Blake Goodwin is the CEO of Goodwin Wealth Management. He was deciding to hire a consultant to make an assessment of his situation. Three large companies had expressed interest to acquire Goodwin Wealth Management. In the fall 2007, Ice Financial Income Fund, First Canadian Band, and Brawn Financial Corporation were the potential suitors and they had made offers to acquire the company. Blake Goodwin had to decide whether to sell the company and if he sold it, which buyer was the best one.
Dustin Seal, a junior at Powell High School, Knoxville, TN drove his mom’s car to Friday-night football game with his friends who had put a knife in the glove compartment without his information. Over a suspicion of drinking alcohol, school vice principal searched Dustin’s car and found a hunting knife. Being unaware of the knife Dustin got suspended with pending expulsion from Powell high by the principal. Following with several appeal processes School board sided with the school principal on expelling Dustin. His father sued the school board for violation of Dustin’s right under fourth and fourteenth amendments to Federal court ruled in favor of Seal and the case was settled with $30,000 award to Dustin.
Scott Peterson was convicted of the murder of Laci Peterson and her unborn son, Conner Peterson. He has been on death row for over a decade as he tries to get his conviction appealed. Peterson and his family maintain his innocence, even participating in a docu-series titled, The Murder of Laci Peterson. This has caused quite a stir among viewers who now say they have doubts about his guilt. Could Scott Peterson been wrongfully imprisoned for so long because of circumstances he had no control over?
JACKSONVILLE, Fla. — A local man has been charged with murder in the death of his boss and allegedly assumed control of his business after burying him in a shallow grave on the Southside of Jacksonville in December of last year, according to Assistant Chief Chris Butler with Jacksonville Sheriff's Office. Police say Richard Greene, 44, of Jacksonville, killed Clyde King for economic reasons and then buried him in a shallow grave on the 11000 block of St. John's Industrial Parkway on the city's Southside. Greene was the only employee of 72-year-old King at his business, King's Lawn Service.
"The State of California versus Scott Lee Peterson (Case number 1056770, 2005)", was an interesting case. This case was interesting because Laci was a very beautiful and seemingly young, friendly, and happily pregnant woman with lots of friends. Her husband, although attractive, had a kind of macho tough guy womanizer type of persona about himself. It is hard to believe or fathom someone being so cruel as to kill their pregnant wife, regardless of their marital problems. Laci came up missing on December 24, of 2002, the day before Christmas.
The Christopher Vaughn case is a popular case in which ballistics and blood spatter aided in solving. Vaughn pleaded not guilty in court, and the defense stuck to the case that it was a murder-suicide case involving his wife. Paul Kish, a blood spatter expert assigned to the case, said that the evidence found at the crime scene did not correlate with Vaughn’s story. Vaughn’s blood was found in many different places; the center console, on his wife’s shorts, on the front and back of her seatbelt, and on the carpet between her shoes. Vaughn’s original statement did not mention the blood present on the seatbelt.
Summary of the Incident Only eleven days into his new job as a New Jersey State Police trooper, Justin Hopson witnessed an act by his training officer that would challenge his moral convictions and change his life forever. During a traffic stop in March 2002, Hopson watched his partner arrest a woman for drunk driving who had not even been behind the wheel. Throughout the court proceedings in this case, Hopson chose not to violate his principles, and refused to validate his partner’s version of events surrounding the arrest. From that point forward, Hopson was targeted by fellow officers in an effort to silence him about this event, and other alleged police misconduct.
The Civil Rights Movement happened because the African American citizens finally stood and fought for their rights. The Civil Rights Movement took place in the 1960s when many cases were brought up to the Supreme Court that led to desegregating a place or even an action. One of the most important cases was the Bailey v. Patterson case. The case’s hearing, Bailey v. Patterson case, took place on February 26th, 1962 which gave the Civil Rights Movement a huge boost. (http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com)The Bailey v. Patterson case was between Samuel Bailey and a Mississippi general attorney.
My second choice would be Frank Hall because he knows what it takes to run a plant. Even though he works for one of Dynamo Industries competitors, he has knowledge of how to manage a department.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 Introduction 3 Competitive Situation 4 Variable Costing 5 Existing Costing System 6 Diagram ABC 8 Activity Based Costing & Profitability 9 Conclusion 14 Bibliography 15 INTRODUCTION COMPETITIVE SITUATION Firstly, here is a brief description of what Wilkerson Company specializes in. According to our case study and various online sources, Wilkerson manufactures and markets a complete line of compressed air treatment components and control products.
There is also the factor that pressure to act unethically often comes from salespeople having to work both with their companies and customers, the goals of which do not always align. Salespeople might do something unethical to close a sale with a customer, but in the long run, that type of behavior will be detrimental to the salesperson’s career, reputation, and could hurt the