When history repeats itself Throughout lesson two of English two part two I have studied Shakespeare's Tragedy of Julius Caesar. As the title would imply this is an incredibly written tragedy that highlights some of man’s worst personality traits, dirtiest actions, and ugliest betrayals as well as man’s undying softness, fragility, and pride. The themes of this play are truly ageless when one considers the events that surrounded the tragic death of Malcolm X hundreds of years after this play was written. The story of Julius Caesar and Malcolm X are so remarkably similar. Both were revered by many and masters of leadership and articulation. And both men were untimely assassinated by the very people they endorsed. Though the stories of these …show more content…
The betrayal that came in the form of a knife by his friend Brutus, alongside thirty two other stab wounds from his trusted colleges. His assassination claimed due because he had become too powerful, and established a sort of dictatorship over Rome. With the Republic of Rome threatened, greedy and unguided men alike justified their grim actions of taking the life of a man who trusted them completely. Perhaps a more seldom known story is that of Malcolm X who, after spending time in prison, endorsed the Nation of Islam. After more than a decade his relationship with the Nation of Islam became strained as his views became a little more radical, while his influence continued to grow. After an ill advised comment on a sore subject for the country earned him a suspension from the Nation of Islam, the Nation of Islam capitalized on the opportunity to have him assassinated. What amazes me most about the likeness of these stories is that both of these men were the spearhead of, and made great, the very organizations that killed them. Both of these organizations claimed to be doing what was in the interest of the greater good. However, Malcolm wasn’t so much betrayed in the same right as Caesar. Although he had devoted a lot of his time and reputation to this group their views and opinions had become oppositional; in simple terms he was killed by an enemy that used to be a friend. Caesar however was truly betrayed by those he
Cited: Malcolm X and Julius Caesar Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words In-text: (Caesar, 2018) Your Bibliography: Caesar, M. (2018). Malcolm X and Julius Caesar Assignment Example Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words. [Online] Student share. Available at https://studentshare.net/history/9350-report [Accessed 3 Mar. 2018].
J.W Milam and Roy Bryant, Emmett’s attackers, savagely assassinated Emmett Till, yet he did not get justice. Roy Bryant was the store clerk’s husband and J.W his half brother, these two shot and tortured Emmett and shot him in the head. After the murder when the trail was held the two murderers
Matthew AlayRamirez, Jonathan Chicas, Gustavo Gonzalez, Jackie Rodriguez H Contemporary Comp. Ms. Nellon #1 (Chicas) Hamilton, Neil A. ? Malcolm X.? American Social Leaders and Activists, Second Edition, Facts On File, 2017.
The social revolutionaries Malcolm X and Fredrick Douglass would most likely have similar points of view due to their experiences being black individuals in a white majority. Frederick Douglass was an African American abolitionist and civil rights activist in the 20th century. He believed in the importance of African Americans in education and spoke out against segregation. On the other hand, Malcolm X felt that African Americans needed to resist oppression and reduce racism. In the excerpt, “Not just an American Problem, but a world problem”, Malcolm X states, “We are living in a society that is by and large controlled by people who believe in racism, and practice segregation and discrimination and racism” (Malcolm X, page 2).
Abraham Lincoln and Martin Luther King were shot on April 14. Abraham Lincoln and Martin Luther King were killed because of their speeches trying to stop something wrong. Abraham Lincoln and Martin Luther King jr. were killed in washington DC. Abraham Lincoln and Martin Luther King jr. were at the white house. Abraham Lincoln and Martin Luther King jr.were shot after making a speech in washington DC.
On March 31, they took action. Some voters were killed from being shot. In 1926, he caused another commotion. Two of his enemies had been spotted in Cicero, and he ordered both them both to be shot. William McSwiggin, a man who had attempted to prosecute Al for a previous murder, was with these men, and he was killed along with them.
The assassinations of both these people had a profound impact on the areas that they lived. Murdering is a
"A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything" Malcolm X. Malcolm X and Walter Lee are a lot a like in both parts, at the beginning and the end of there lives. Both hard and gritty in the beginning and by the end they changed dramatically. Some would say for the best others might say for the worst. Here soon you will understand exactly why Malcolm and Walter are a like and some what different.
Brutus was a traitor to his country because of his display of treason. However, Brutus may have done what was best for Rome, to improve and reestablish his beloved country. Similarly, people may claim that Brutus was, in fact doing what was best for his country, and that murdering Caesar was not a betrayal. He seems to feel that Caesar would not be an asset to Rome and Brutus wants to really improve the country.
It's a radical extremist REVOLUTION for equality Malcolm X once said “If you’re not ready to die for it, put the word ‘freedom’ out of your vocabulary.” This is just one of many quotes that show how much X believed in his cause. Malcolm was definitely a forerunner and distinguished person when it came to people fighting equality. He fought not only for african americans and muslims, but for humans of all races to be equal.
After reading excerpts from Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, write an essay that compares Brutus’ speech with Marc Antony’s speech and argues the effectiveness of the rhetorical devices (ethos, pathos, logos) used in each. Be sure to support your position with evidence from the texts. William Shakespeare writes a play about Julius Caesar’s assassination and the speeches his friends gave at his funeral. In the play, Brutus assassinated Caesar because he thought he was protecting Rome. He was saying that if Caesar got all the power he would most likely become vicious and make everyone his slaves.
Elenor Roosevelt and Malcolm X seem so different at first. They grew up with completely different childhoods, but there goals and methods are more similar than you would think. For example, they both wanted to achieve different things, but when those things didn't work out, they didn't give up. Elenor Roosevelt and Malcolm X's goals were different, but their methods of getting there were quite similar. One of the biggest similarities between Roosevelt and X is that they both never gave up.
This is a comparison between two mean one being Julius Caesar an the other Malcolm X. I have chosen Malcolm X because he is pretty much a more modern day Julius Caesar. They both were killed by the same person. Also they were taught to be leaders by others. Julius Caesar was born July 12, 100 BCE in Rome, Italy. He was a Roman politician, a general, and a author.
Brutus, According to Shakespeare The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, a Shakespearean play and representation of the assassination of Caesar, is a well written and developed story in which the build up of the characters is very well done. As a matter of fact, the developing of Brutus, the tragic hero on the play, is one of the most important characters and therefore one of the better explained and exposed. Brutus is a character that is marked with three traits that allow him to be the one responsible for Caesar's assassination. Indeed, Brutus is naive, well-intended and hypocrite, as seen when the conspirators convince him to be part of it, and be one of the most important figures in it.
From a common thug to a fiercely intelligent leader, Malcolm X has set the stage for an audience to be truly inspired. His passion for knowledge flows from the pages of his work, “Learning to Read,” naturally drawing the reader into a time and place many people don't know about; prison in the 1940's and '50's. Malcolms devotion to learning, albeit not in the traditional sense, shows in his writing. When describing his past, Malcolm X draws a clear picture of what his time in prison was like. Although his work is not as refined as a piece of literature from someone like Dickens or Hemingway, Malcolm X presents to his audience that willingness, motivation, and a desire to learn can go a long way. Even though Malcolm is telling