As if an enemy’s country is a book written by Richard Archer which is a history of those key months between October 1, 1768 and the winter of 1770 when Boston became a occupied town. This book examines the Sugar Act, a piece of legislation presented by the Prime Minister George Grenville and passed by the Parliament of Great Britain on April 5, 1764 as well as its impact on Boston. The Sugar Act was meant to raise profit, but to also rule over the Britain’s colonies. This essence stays a change in the relations of the country and its colonies. In the book, he considers the Molasses Act of 1733, which had placed a tariff on the gas on the foreign molasses and turned out to be both necessary and ill conceived. In the end, it discusses the Boston …show more content…
On the British side there were disloyal subjects preparing for rebellion while some of the Americans claimed there were victims. William Pitt, as their leader, the Bostonians believed he would continue to defend the British and his threats were Grenville and Rockingham. Likewise, Pitt resolved bad grain harvest crisis soon after taking office, he became frightened and frustrated in December 1766 and retreated to Bath where he remained for the next two years. At this critical moment, Chancellor of the Exchequer Charles Townshend in 1767 stepped into power and became approved by the Parliament of Great Britain, which composed of three major components which were tax on lead, paint, glass, and tea from other countries. The second was the establishment of the American Board Commissionaires and the third was the punishment of the New York legislature for the failure to fill all of the requirements of the Quartering Act. Bostonians were ravage as they received the first sneak of the Act and Boston became divided and weary of the situation. Twelve Letters approached by a farmer were complaints of the legislation unconstitutional rights. The Townshend program insisted Britain’s control over its American
Patrick Henry’s “Give me Liberty or Give me Death” speech was given out during the Revolutionary era. During this period in time the founding fathers were in the second Virginia convention deciding if they should make an infantry to fight against Great Britain and be able to gain their freedom. There were many discussions regarding this issue since many of the colonies were afraid of being killed since this infantry was going to be made out of mostly farmers and colonists who did not have any type of military experience. This frightened everyone since many of them believed that the infantry would not be able to win in a revolutionary war.
Speech to the Second Virginia Convention Analysis From 1764 to 1773 British rule set forth a series of statutes upon the American colonies these varied from taxes to forcing colonists to house and feed British soldiers. The aftereffect of the enactments were the Boston Massacre in 1770 and the Boston Tea Party in 1773. Because of the tea party, the British Parliament set a series of laws called the Intolerable Acts in 1774. This was meant to punish the colonies for their previous protests and riots, but instead it became the catalyst for the colonists to revolt. On March 23rd 1775 Patrick Henry gave a speech at the Second Virginia convention to persuade the conference goers to vote in favor of Virginia joining the revolution.
Parliament created the declaratory act and then later the Townshend duties. The colonists despised these new implications and many overlooked the declaratory act and colonists boycotted, petitioned, and used news papers to attack the Townshend duties. This did not sit well back in Britain due to the colonists evident defiance of the crown. To collect the taxes that the colonist were supposed to be paying in Boston Britain sent in red coats to collect the crown's money. By the crown doing this the colonists banded together and began rioting.
The author’s purpose in writing The Marketplace of Revolution is to explain how Colonial America performed popular mobilization, revolutionize the way that people think of the American Revolution, and the causes of it also from an entirely new light that is incredibly different from any other historian that has ever told the story of the uprising of the American colonies against the all-powerful rule of the British monarchy. The author also sets out to show that the popular mobilization was not just a fluke or something that just come out of nowhere. This tells the story of why so many people came to the same conclusion of, “Give me liberty or give me death!” and fought back against seemingly insurmountable forces. The colonists had to overcome all the things that separated them and become united as a singular force. (pg.
The Sugar Interest wanted to be positive the colonists were not buying anyone else ’s rum except for English rum, so the Act places customs duties on non-British sugar and prohibited any rum that was not British. Most colonists actually did not mind this and thought it was constitutional, except for Boston who grew to be quite angry especially since smugglers had a harder time of making a living now. Next, comes the Stamp Act, which was a miniscule tax on just about everything made of paper. Some colonies already had their own type of Stamp Act imposed, so the extra tax made most colonists very angry especially because it was an internal tax; therefore, it is unconstitutional.
Emma Greathouse Period 9 Mr. Pratt GOAL History 9 November 29, 2016 Section One Citizen Tom Paine by Howard Fast is the lengthy, descriptive account of the life of one of the most influential authors in America’s time, Thomas Paine. Paine was a middle aged, scrappy, hungry, and poor shell of a man. This novel goes back to the very beginning of Paine’s journey when he met with a Dr. Benjamin Franklin in the fall of 1774 to discuss Paine’s getting a job as a staymaker in America. He traveled on a ship ridden with fever for 9 weeks, and by the end of this trip, he himself was sick and dying. He received treatment once in Philadelphia and fully recovered.
And, as aforementioned, it raised revenues from the taxations that defrayed the expenditure of the Empire. Another conflict arose as the American Mutiny (Quartering) Act of 1765 empowered colonial governors more in the way that ‘when British garrisons were moved to any place where inadequate barracks existed, they might be put into barns, inns, and private residences’. It even asked the colonists to ‘supply various items to the troops … to help meet the costs of the British garrison’. It required little imagination to sense that such military imposition on the colonists’ lives certainly provoked resentment. As a result, for fear of loss of political and economic autonomy, the colonists mounted vociferous response to London.
Road to the Revolution4th periodElise Williams Paragraph #1: IntroductionHave you ever wondered what events lead to the American Revolution? Specific eventssuch as the Navigation Act of 1660, The French and Indian War, Pontiac’sRebellion/Proclamation of 1763, the Sugar Act, the Stamp Act, the Declaratory Act, theTownshend Act, the Boston Massacre, the Boston Tea Party, and finally the Intolerable Actshelped spark the American Revolution. The Navigation Act of 1660 is the first contribution tothe Revolution. These acts was the first contributions that sparked the American Revolution. Paragraph #2: Navigation Act of 1660The Navigation Act of 1660 was the first spark to the American Revolution. BritishParliament
The port of boston was closed and the entire city was punished on behalf of a few peoples wrong actions. As paraphrased in document B American protest became dangerous and disruptive British responses were in response of what the Americans
At the dawn of the 1770s, American colonial resentment of the British Parliament in London had been steadily increasing for some time. Retaliating in 1766, Parliament issued the Declaratory Act which repealed most taxes except issued a reinforcement of Parliament’s supremacy. In a fascinating exchange, we see that the Parliament identifies and responds to the colonists main claim; Parliament had no right to directly tax colonists who had no representation in Parliament itself. By asserting Parliamentary supremacy while simultaneously repealing the Stamp Act and scaling back the Sugar Act, Parliament essentially established the hill it would die on, that being its legitimacy. With the stage set for colonial conflict in the 1770s, all but one
Between 1763 and 1775, there were three ‘Imperial Crises’ which occurred between the British and the American colonists. The conflict that was produced during this period arose through an undefined balance of political and economic power between the two parties. In 1763, Britain had just concluded the French and Indian war and was left with an immense and almost crippling debt of around 140 million pounds sterling (“Turning Point In American History”). In Britain’s eyes, the most effective way to reduce this debt was increased taxes. Unfortunately, the people of England were already massively overtaxed, which meant the last option for the British was to tax the American colonists.
The town of Boston had been uneasy even before the “Massacre”. Tension had been building up since the early 1760s because the town was affected by the forces of migration and change. With the new slate of taxes known as the Townshend Duties, people like Samuel Adams encouraged the townspeople to increase their remonstrates. In
The French and Indian War left England with a debt of £130,000,000. To help pay off the debt Britain set up taxes, to collect money, on frequently used products by the colonists. The Molasses Act put a six pence tax on every gallon of molasses. The colonists thought this was a lot of money to pay so they did everything to avoid it. This act was not really enforced and the colonists did not really obey this act.
Tensions were high in Boston between the British and the Colonists. Between the Boston Massacre in 1770 and the Boston Tea Party in 1773, Britain was very upset with Boston. King George III, the Lord North- led British government and many of the British citizens were very upset and irritated when they found out that the Boston colonists had made “Tea with salt water”. Once the parliament heard of their escapade, they began thinking of a way to insure that there would be no more uprisings in the Massachusetts colony.
The development of slavery and self-government in the Americas from the colonial to the revolutionary period presents two main contradictions which are important not in setting the stage for the American Revolution but also help to establish division between the colonies after the Revolution leading into the Civil War. While one contradiction applies exclusively to the Northern colonies, the other applies to all the colonies and is a key factor leading up to the American Revolution. For the New England colonies, the contradiction between the development of slavery and self-government lies behind the reason these colonies were developed. Around 1608, the Separatists, beginning to receive more hostility from the Anglican Church and government