“If Lincoln Had Not Freed The Slaves” In the article “If Lincoln Had Not Freed The Slaves” written by Tom Wicker, he puts forth many opinions on Lincoln and his participation on freeing the slaves with his Emancipation Proclamation. The Emancipation Proclamation was first given on September 22, 1862 proposing a date for freedom for more than three million slaves in the United States. Tom Wicker asks and answers the question of “What would have happened if Lincoln had not freed the slaves and there was never an Emancipation Proclamation issued?” Three points worth elaborating on are the racial segregation of blacks, Lincoln’s opinion on the war, and the decision made by Lincoln on when to release the Emancipation Proclamation.
The racial
…show more content…
Lincoln always wanted to win the war at hand. In the article it is stated,”If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it..” This basically states that Lincoln would do pretty much anything to save the Union and eventually win the war. Lincoln says that he would do anything to help the cause at hand. Apparently Lincoln thought that attempting to freeing the slaves would have helped the war effort. Helping the war effort is one thing but you must be devoted and passionate about the topic of freeing mistreated slaves. In my opinion Lincoln did have that passion to some extent, but I do believe that winning the war was more important to him than freeing the slaves. It is stated in the article that LIncoln believed “My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union and is not either to save or to destroy slavery.” This basically means that Abraham Lincoln’s main goal was to save the Union and not to fully free the slaves. This does not fully mean that the freeing of the slaves wasn’t something that Lincoln wanted to get rid of but just a supporting factor to diminish later in history.Lincoln also believed that he would do less if he decided that what he was doing was hurting the cause and do more if he decided that what he was doing was helping the cause. This in my opinion was somewhat of a smart move to make. There …show more content…
Many battles being presented as well as defeats ultimately delayed the proclamation on being released. The timing on releasing the proclamation had to be perfect. I believe that the delays that presented themselves were necessary to the perfect window of time on releasing the Emancipation Proclamation to the public. Lincoln also chose to read to the Cabinet the first draft of the preliminary Emancipation Proclamation, his mind was made up but many people thought that the proclamation may come off to be a cry of distress if issued. The proclamation in my opinion was no way a cry of distress but a way to show some sort of light to the cruel treatment of black slaves and that it should be stopped. Even if it was just a small step to complete freedom for all, it was the right step on making the country unified as whole. The waiting did eventually pay off though, after all the waiting and hesitation, the proclamation was issued. The timing was made useful, if not released when it was, the fatal diplomatic act would have not been prevented for the Union. I believe that if the Emancipation Proclamation was released any other time than when it was, the result may have been quite different. The interesting fact is not only did the Emancipation Proclamation give hope to black society, bringing in 180,000 black troops by the end of 1865, but it
This proclamation allowed African American Soldiers to enlist in the Northern army which gave them a huge advantage. The emancipation proclamation was issued by Lincoln in 1863, which went underneath the south's ability to keep slavery and declared that all southern slaves were now free. After this was pointed into action the union army grew to contain 10% African Americans which led to the victory of the south. One more point that Current talks about is the blockade. The blockade was enforced by the union navy which blocked the southern ports and prevented the south from getting necessary supplies.
Abraham Lincoln was a politician, and the president of a country that seemed to be falling apart at the time. Lincoln's number one goal was to preserve the
He made it very clear that he didn’t want slavery to spread and would work to see that slavery didn’t spread. President Lincoln said if he could save the Union by keeping slavery where it already existed, he would do that. Saving the Union was his top priority. However, the South didn’t trust President Lincoln to keep his word.
He did not want the issue of slavery to become more important than the rights granted in the constitution. Lincoln tiredly tried to preserve the union, while upholding the constitution and used Machiavelli principles to do so. Danoff
The civil war became a different war as the gleaming sun set over the bloody fields of Antietam. After the union had partially won the battle, Abraham Lincoln changed the war as he wrote one of the most controversial, and most crucial documents in American history: the Emancipation Proclamation (Dudley 166). Mr. Lincoln’s preliminary proclamation declared that on January 1, 1863, all slaves remaining in areas of the South “in rebellion would be declared then, thenceforward, and forever free” (Dudley 167). The Emancipation Proclamation paved the way to the abolition of slavery, and is by far one of the most important accomplishments made in history.
’s Thesis was centered around the idea that Lincoln viewed emancipation as “a goal to be achieved through prudential means, so that worthwhile consequences might result.” He argued that every gradual step Lincoln took towards the abolition of slavery was done to “balance the integrity of ends with the integrity of means,” to accomplish this while still placing the constitution above all of his personal opinions. Guelzo then presented and answered four questions that he believed arose as a result of his prudence argument; why is the language of the Proclamation bland, did the Proclamation actually do anything, did the slaves free themselves, and finally did Lincoln issue the Proclamation to only to prevent European intervention or inflate Union morale? In response to the first, Guelzo makes the point that the Proclamation was a legal document, and that “every syllable was liable to… legal
Between the start of the Civil War and the passing of the Emancipation Proclamation, opinions about emancipation took a turn for the better. During the Civil War, President Lincoln decided that the Union could use emancipation, or the freeing of slaves, as a weapon against the South and wrote the Emancipation Proclamation in September of 1862. The Emancipation Proclamation, put into effect on the first of January in 1863, was a document declaring the release of slaves from the cruel chains of slavery. In an October issue from 1861, the Sacramento Bee stated that the emancipation of slaves would only worsen things, because black people and white people can never live as equals. The superior race will always rise, and the lower race will
He used the civil war as a way to end slavery even though it didn’t start like that. In Lincoln’s second Inaugural Address he mentioned that “One-eighth of the whole population were colored slaves, not distributed generally over the Union, but localized in the southern part of it. These slaves constituted a peculiar and powerful interest. All knew that this interest was somehow the cause of the war.” Lincoln wanted freedom for all and was able to free most but not all.
He showed that he did not believe one side was better than the other when it came to their actions, because it took both sides to achieve the effects. He states “Both parties deprecated war, but one of them would make war rather than let the nation survive, and the other would accept war rather than let it perish, and the war came.” If you take special note of his final phrasing towards the end of the sentence, Lincoln says “... and the war came.” This shows that he did not say something along the lines of “This war was caused by the North’s lust to end slavery”, but instead, he chooses to stay passive in his choice of
On paragraph 7 It says “However, Lincoln continues, God may want the war to continue until all the wealth earned from 250 years of slavery is drained. And he may want the war to continue until every drop of blood drawn from an enslaved person is paid for with a drop of soldier’s blood. Even if this is true, Lincoln says, God is still as just and righteous as he’s ever been. Lincoln then concludes with a call to peace.” Lincoln just wanted peace for everyone.
It was the summer of 1862, Lincoln had the idea of crippling the confederacy's war effort, and he shocked the cabinet when he suggested freeing the slaves of the confederacy thus ending any labor support for their armies. After 3 months of debate whether this would work or not, on January 1st, 1863, the Emancipation Proclamation was created and it affected the war in their favor. Freeing slaves was now another reason for the war and it was good enough to draw in new and eager troops to join the war. Strength: The text announce Lincoln’s true intention for the emancipation proclamation and how he was able to get support and increased troops thanks to slaves joining.
The preliminary Emancipation Proclamation warned all rebellious states that within 100 days if they have not returned to the Union all their slaves will be free. As per the terms of the preparatory Proclamation, President Lincoln on January 1, 1863, issued his last Emancipation Proclamation, which was viable upon its issuance. The Emancipation Proclamation, which can be viewed as an act of bravery was actually very selfish. As one dig deep in history, it shows that Lincoln was never an abolitionist but did all he could to protect the Union. This politics will be discussed more later on in the paper.
Somebody once remarked, “No man is good enough to govern another man without the other's consent” (“Abraham Lincoln Quotes"). At the initial view, the Civil War was going to be won by the South. Nonetheless, all that changed when Abraham Lincoln constructed the Emancipation Proclamation because it did not solely free slaves, it further altered antiquity for the salutary and assisted the North in the war, which led to their triumph. The Emancipation Proclamation was Abraham Lincoln’s greatest achievement as president.
Vu Pham Professor Sunshine McClain History 170 May 22, 2016 Abraham Lincoln Does Not Deserve To be The Great Emancipator Abolition of slavery was a big controversy in the United State of America in the nineteenth century due to the different stances between northern and southern states which led to the American Civil war. At the present time, Abraham Lincoln was the president of the United States who supported the north (Union) thought that free the slave could help him united all the states. As the result, he passed out the Emancipation Proclamation on September 22, 1862, which give freedom to slaves in the states that the Union did not control. After the war, he issued the Thirteenth Amendment on December 6, 1865, to free all slaves.
On September 2nd, 1862, Abraham Lincoln famously signed the Emancipation Proclamation. After that, there’s been much debate on whether Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation truly played a role in freeing the slaves with many arguments opposing or favoring this issue. In Vincent Harding’s essay, The Blood-red Ironies of God, Harding argues in his thesis that Lincoln did not help to emancipate the slaves but that rather the slaves “self-emancipated” themselves through the war. On the opposition, Allen C Guelzo ’s essay, Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation: The End of Slavery in America, argues in favor of the Emancipation Proclamation and Guelzo acknowledges Lincoln for the abolishment of slavery through the Emancipation Proclamation.