t 's said we all have one vote no matter how rich, poor, tall, short, smart, or uninformed, we get one vote and elections are the great equalizer as everybody is reduced to "one vote." (Wrong)
When it comes to the US presidential elections, some voters have more influence than others. When we vote, we aren’t voting for the President. We are voting to encourage our state’s Electoral College members to vote a certain way. And if the past and current elections hold, it looks like one candidate will win the electoral vote while another wins the popular vote as we saw in the 2017 election.
Each state has a different number of electors, based on the number of representatives they have in Congress, which is based on population. I.e. Alabama has
…show more content…
i.e. California has over 65 times the population of Wyoming, but only 18 times the representation in the Electoral College.
Take this ratio between electors, the state population and compare the relative influence of one voter in one state to a voter in a different state with a different population and the number of electors.
When Measured this way, a voter in Wyoming has four times more influence on the electoral college vote than any voter in Texas. Thus. The US general elections are not the great equalizer. The general election designed in a way where voters in less populous states have more per-voter influence on Electoral College than voters in more populous states. (Due to the Apportionment Act of 1911), which limits the House of Representatives size and keeps the House from growing along with the population as Article 1 of the U.S. Constitution outlines.
The answer to this problem is a not a more direct voting system based on the popular vote. Conversely, even though all forms of democracy have problems, the current elections process produces exceptionally bad
…show more content…
Ben Carson 's appointment within the Trump Presidential administration), represents the same tokenism in that, the members of the dominant group, treat the minority appointee (Ben Carson) as a representative of the whole minority group. Treatment from the dominant group that includes expectations about the person 's behavior. Minority representative (Ben Carson ) must play a role that enhances and furthers the mission of the (Trump) and the dominant group, as well as placate the President 's and the Admisintartions minority constituents, while he stays out of trouble, and avoids controversy or butting heads with the Trump
Between news sources, multi-media outlets, and social media, Americans are able to educate themselves and form their own personal opinions concerning politics. When the Electoral College was created, in the late 1700’s, those that were permitted to vote received little knowledge about who they were actually voting for, so it only seemed plausible to have the well-educated people of the nation make the final decision. This idea had protected the U.S. from the risk of leaving the power of choosing who the President is in the hands of ill informed voters of the 1700’s. But now it is the 21st century, and this concept has become outdated to the U.S.’s
According to the Huffington Post, “The electors are usually state-elected officials, party leaders, or people with a strong affiliation with the Presidential candidates” (“What is the Electoral College?”). Furthermore, the process for nominating electors in each state varies. Typically speaking, each political party “either nominate slates of potential Electors at their state party conventions or they chose them by a vote of the party's central committee” (“About the Electors”).
Due to the past election there has been several protests and opposing opinions thrown from both the Democratic and Republican parties. One particular article, “Why We Should Abolish the Electoral College”, suggests the idea that our society should abolish the electoral college, due to it’s “unequal distributed [voting power] across our nation”, and switch to the popular vote, when voting during a presidential election. At first this idea may seem sensible to those who do not understand how the electoral college works, the demand is in fact, senseless and will only lead to unproportioned voting amongst all states. However, it is easy to understand why this article is depicting that the electoral college needs adjustments, and to view the main
The president and the VP of the United States are not picked by an across the nation prevalent vote of the American individuals they are picked by 538 balloters this procedure is spelled out in the United States Constitution. The discretionary school is a gathering of individuals designated by every state who formally choose the president and VP of the United States. Implying that greater states would have more Electoral votes than little states since their populace is greater. The Electoral College is comprised of 538 voters who cast votes to choose the President and Vice-President of the United States. At the point when voters go to the surveys on Tuesday, they will pick which competitor gets their state 's balloters.
Consisting of 538 electors, a majority of 270 electoral votes is required to elect a President (NARA). Representation in the college is directly proportionate to the number of Congressional members your state has, one for each Senator and Representative. When a citizen casts
For example disproportionate state votes, tie votes, and unbound electors are hindering democracy. The first and foremost issue is voting. Each state is provided one electoral vote for each member of its delegation, However, depending on a state 's population the amount of electoral votes varies. For example, "an individual in Wyoming has more than triple the weight in electoral votes compared to a citizen in California.
Should the Electoral College be Abolished? After the 2000 presidential election, and more recently the 2016 election, many have suggested that America abolish the electoral college, as it has elected the candidate with the lower popular vote on multiple occasions. Although a direct democratic approach to presidential elections (where the election is decided by popular vote) appears to many as an appropriate solution, this approach would grant too much power to large metropolitan areas, make rural votes practically irrelevant, and take away power from states. In order to prevent a situation like such, the electoral college should not be abolished—it must remain, but slight alterations should be made so that America is more equally represented.
Currently, the electoral voters are the only ones with a direct vote in the election. In order for the election to be more reflective of the citizens’ wishes, the popular vote should become more significantly tied to the election. The Electoral College should not be the most prominent voting process, when the popular vote should be more important. The risk of untrustworthy electors increases, which causes the voter to feel that they are being cheated out of their votes, which may discourage them from voting in the future. There is also the high possibility in which neither candidates receive the majority of electoral votes required to win election, such as what occurred in the 1824 election, meaning the House of Representatives would have to decide who becomes
With the electoral college in place we see that some states have more power than others when it come to the vote depending on their size and the amount of senators they have. As an example we see in Texas they have 38 electoral vote and California has 55(Document A) Compared to the 3 in Montana and 4 in idaho (Document A) we see that Texas and California have a lot
As an encouragement to vote most of us have probably been told, “every vote counts” at some point in our lives. In reality, this is not true in presidential elections due to the Electoral College and what it does. The Electoral College has flaws in it that can prohibit the outcome of the election from accurately reflecting whom a majority the people of the country cast their vote for. Not only will he abolishment of the electoral college change the outcome of elections, it can change the whole campaign process and the way some people in less represented states feel about voting increasing voter turnout.
All through the history of the United States of America, many people have discussed the abolishment of the Electoral College. For many reasons, some believe it is what makes our country have the type of government we have, some believe that it's what limits the power of the government, and many people such as Mitch McConnell believes it is what gives us our freedom and prosperity. While these are valid arguments there is a multitude of reasons to why the electoral college should be abolished. Such as there is only a need for twelve states in order to become the president, popular vote of the people for president can still lose, and the Swing states are given too much power and attention compared to that of the other states. This is why I believe in the abolishment of the Electoral College.
The electoral college also helps the small states have an opinion that actually is heard in the presidential election. In class, it was discussed that Wyoming, Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota together, though their combined population is less than that of Oklahoma, each of those states has three electoral votes, whereas Oklahoma just has seven votes. Going by electoral votes, a candidate would have a better chance at winning the election if they won over Wyoming, Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota versus Oklahoma. With the electoral college, a candidate could win over all thirty-nine small states and win the entire election. Though the candidate could be supported by less than a quarter of the population,
Elections for President and Vice President in the United States of America are determined and voted on by an electoral college. With five hundred and thirty-eight electoral votes, a presidential candidate must get a majority win amongst the electoral college, which is at least two hundred and seventy votes, to win the presidency. The electoral college in the United States is made up of a group of electors, whose only role is to elect the president and vice-president. They elect both positions with one vote for a presidential candidate and another for a vice presidential candidate. Electors do not work as electors year-round because the presidential elections are once every four years, and they only vote for presidential and vice presidential
The Electoral College is the process to which the United States elects the President, and the Vice President. The founders of the Constitution came up with this process. This was done to give additional power to the small states, and it was done to satisfy them. It works by the citizens of the United States electing representatives called electors. Each state is given the same amount of electors, as they are members of congress.
Several years after the United States came to be, the Constitutional Convention met to determine how the new nation should govern itself. The delegates saw that it was crucial to have a president and vice president, but the delegates did not want these offices to reflect how the colonies were treated under the British rule. The delegates believed that the president’s power should be limited, and that he should be chosen through the system known as the Electoral College. The Electoral College is a body of people who represent the states of the US, who formally cast votes for the electing of the president and vice president. Many citizens feel that the Electoral College goes against our nation’s principle of representative democracy, while others