Safety is an important factor in sports especially in hockey. Since this is the case should college hockey players have to wear cages or be allowed the privilege of wearing visors. It also brings up the point that college students should be allowed to wear visors because of the risk it puts the players into. However, both sides have great arguments but I feel the visors take the cake here. Safety is important that’s why college players should be allowed to wear visors. Visors are the better choice for college students to be wearing because, they focus on college students with most of there reasonings. The visors are cheaper and allow better vison to the players on the ice "NHL players have the option to wear cages or visors and they all choose …show more content…
USA hockey even says college players should allow visors and all of the upsides to them. “Guys our age wear them in Canada so I don’t see why college teams can’t do it” (Derek Stephan1). To sum up the visors have more upsides then cages do. “its been noted that American college hockey is the only level of the sport where players over the age of 18 must wear full facial protection” (jess Myers1). Although the cage supporters have good points the visors are still taking the cake. If the players have visors on they will be able to fight atracting more fans and crowds to games. Fighting is penalized with a five-minute major and a game disqualification, meaning that the offending player is out of that game and the next game. If college players had visors they would have to change that rule so players wouldn’t be kicked out of the next game. since NHL player don’t have this rule then the college students wouldn’t either. However, the rules would be changed it would be for the better for the players and …show more content…
High hits and highstick to pucks in the face will all start more injuries and will need to be taken seriously because it will all be new to the visor playes. This is a serious thing that cant be just a joke to the kids playing. Getting hit high is a big deal that can lead to injuries. from concussions to bleeding it’s a serious matter. Matt Calvert was hit in the face with a slapshot this season and had to leave and get 36 stitches in his face. However, the pro visors have good reasoning we believe the cages are the better choice. Will visors cost the team more money to wear them? If the college teams are allowed to wear visors then they would have to get a medic in the locker room or on the bench is a play goes wrong and the player needs to be operated on. Each team must have a minimum of 2 team physicians in attendence at games. If NHL players need two team Physicians then college teams would need atleast one. From here on you need to think about the bad sides of allowing college teams to wear
When the so-called leaders of the hockey world, and subsequently the rest of hockey culture, fail to understand the simplicity of concussion protocols and healing processes, how do we ever expect this culture to be fixed? Change starts at the top, and we are far from that. To this day, hockey culture still prides themselves on toughing it out, regardless of knowing the long-term effects. Joe Murphy’s story is a powerful reminder of the significance and importance of addressing the risks of concussions and need for a cultural shift in player safety.
Physical contact: The main difference of opinion between work force ’s and womanhood ’s lacrosse comes down to contact. In the men’s biz , body-checking is legal — and encouraged (especially by coaches) — while in the women’s game, it is not. As a result, there is far less protective equipment in the women’s game: Men wear helmet , lip guard , baseball glove , shoulder joint inking pad , elbow digs , and often rib lodgings , whereas women wear mouth guards and protective eyewear, but (with the exception of goalies) no helmets or 7 senses of pad
If it becomes more popular it’ll bring in more revenue which is what they are trying to do. Collegiate sports, just like pro sports, are nationally televised and the athletes are sometimes “sold” to others bringing in even more money but the athlete is not allowed to receive any of it. Even collegiate coaches bring in over $100 thousand a year and can even work a separate job to bring in more if they please. But yet, the athletes are left with if at all possible, a scholarships for room and board and
For example, better protective head gear and rules against head butting would allow less permanent damage and head-on-head contact. These changes could make the sport much safer for players, including young children that are being put in danger by playing football. The dangers of football concealed by the NFL were detrimental to the lives of many players, young and old, and their loved ones.
There are many different opinions that have developed on this subject. There are good points argued for both sides of this issue. However, college athletes should
People have been getting concussions from hitting the turf like Zack Lystedt. On professional fields, the fields could be made in something less hard to soften impacts (Tarshis). There are some new requirements that should be mandatory. If a player is suspected to have a concussion should have to pass a memory test. This helps know the player did not lose memory which is an effect of a concussion.
Concussions are a very serious issue. The doctors and safety officials need to treat it accordingly. Athletes should sit out long enough to allow the brain to heal completely. If a concussion is sustained to a victim at the high school or collegiate level, the patient should be ruled out for the remainder of the game, at least.
The main change that could easily be made to help with the problem is to better the quality of the helmets used in the sport. It would not be too hard because new helmets are already being made just for the concussion cases. After this, changes could be made to the sport for safety. There will always be some dangers in the sport because it is a very high contact sport. “Despite the best efforts of the leagues, the players, and the medical and engineering communities, the incidence of injury at all levels of the game continues to increase” (Solving football’s).
The dangers of football can be decreased by increasing the padding in the protective garments for football players, providing education for football players on the dangers and injuries that can occur, and having daily medical checkups for the players. These tactics will protect the football player from the dangers of the sport of football. The sport of football has many risks and dangers; however, if the protective gear of the players had more padding, than the players would be more protected. The padding would create a small barrier between colliding players and would absorb some of the force from the tackle. In the article, “High School Football’s Benefits Outweigh the Risks,” Ed.
It seems that every week players are getting injured and carted off the field and statistics show that concussions had risen 32 percent between the 2014-2015 seasons, that is 271 concussions in the 2015 season compared to 206 in 2014. There was also an increase of ACL and MCL injuries between the 2014-2015 seasons, although the change was not as drastic. These statistics from ESPN show that there might be a better way to play the game but the leagues and programs insist that the players know the risks of what they are doing. As hundreds of thousands of sports concussions continue to happen every year, the issue has gathered people who say that the leagues/programs should do more and others who say that concussions and getting injured are just
NHL Fighting Research Essay Since 1922, fighting has been in the NHL rulebook as an official part of the game. Fighting brings in thousands of people that are not necessarily big hockey fans, because of its intense, exhilarating, and fun aspect in the sport of hockey. People come to watch the big team enforcers go out on the ice to send a message or change momentum in the game, and the crowd loves it. Movies have been made about just fighting in hockey, where actual hockey skill was irrelevant, and fisticuffs was the reason they were playing.
I believe that soccer players shouldn’t wear headgear. I think they shouldn’t wear headgear because some of the headgear cost to much. Also because during a soccer game if you’re running and your helmet falls down you can’t stop and fix it you would have to just keep it off. There’s so much reason why you shouldn’t wear headgear. But you shouldn’t wear helmets because you're not always going to get hurt on your head you can have other injuries like your arm,leg,knee,elbow,and ect.
Safety of Skiers and Snowboarders Ski helmets are definitely better to be worn than not to be worn or to say it's better to safe rather than sorry. Helmets have saved lives of bicyclists, skateboarders, skaters and others because they are required to be worn. People who have gotten in accidents while wearing helmets were most likely very thankful that they were wearing a helmet. Although these type of accidents do not necessarily happen to you, they do happen on a daily basis and come very unexpectedly, even on the slopes. I believe that there should be law that requires people to wear helmets when snow-skiing and snowboarding, no matter the age, because it is for their safety and to avoid extreme consequences if not worn.
Ice hockey surpasses all sports in terms of speed. Not only are slap shots taken at unbelievably high speeds, but the game and the players themselves are perform at paces much higher than other team sports. Due to the extreme speed of the players and the puck, hockey equipment is continually having to meet a higher standard of protection. The protection of goalies and the size and standard of their equipment is an especially hot topic of debate.
I agree with these students and I wouldn’t want to be forced to wear a uniform either. To begin, parents don’t want to pay the extra money for a school uniform. It’s extremely expensive and the student 's parents have to buy even more appliances on top of that. Let’s weigh the pros and cons of school uniforms states, “The cost of uniforms is prohibitive, especially when a family includes more than one school-aged child.”