"I went to a fight the other night and a hockey game broke out.¨ When many hear this they imagine the gruel, unforgiving, fights you find on the internet. But that's not the case, fighting in Pro hockey is Ethical and should stay in the game. This is because it cannot be removed for safety reasons, the players don't want it banned, and all players do take into consideration circumstances and make a calculated decision.
First, fighting has had a long history in the game and if it were to be removed, havoc would break out. It's a simple fact when you leave a bunch of players moving up and down the ice with high circumstances, heat is going to rise. And players need to stand up for their team. Chicago Tribune Article ¨Why is fighting vanishing
…show more content…
Why stop something that isn't your problem? If 98 percent of players want to fight and find it essential to the game, why would you take it away? If the players want it in the game it should stay. This is supported by Gregg Wyshynski who interviewed numerous NHL players and put together that Due to his recordings, ¨98% of NHL players surveyed in 2012 said they do not want to ban fighting in hockey. Fighting is an essential part of the professional game, and it is governed by the NHL rulebook.¨ (Greg Wyshynski, 2012). Continued with, ¨NHL enforcers get tired both during the game and as the season progresses, given the extreme physical toll that fighting bouts assert on the participants (the players need to maintain balance on ice while pummeling their rival for a duration of approximately half a minute), they become physically exhausted and thus less motivated to engage. As a case in point, it is considered unfair according to “the code” to initiate a fight with a rival who is at the end of his on-ice shift, as if acknowledging that the player is tremendously tired and not in prime shape to scuffle.¨ (Greg Wyshynski, 2012). 98% is not a small number and shows that players rely on fighting to keep a team going. Even concerning my first point, if they use words like Sacrifice and, are still ok with it just shows the importance it has to the game counter-argument meant some may have is that of course the players want to fight, it's their game …show more content…
Players take into consideration many different factors when considering fighting. Per the National Library of Science, ¨Before engaging in fighting behavior, players assess the utility of their actions and thus will fight less when the game is on the line (third period) and when champions are crowned (postseason). The converging evidence suggests that players take into account the penalties associated with fighting and are less likely to engage in violence when the stakes are high, such as at the end of a game or a season. This implies, in turn, that major acts of aggression in the league are more likely to be calculated rather than impulsive.¨ (National Library of Science, 2013). This evidence shows players think before they fight. To add on, during the postseason fights go down significantly, ¨The findings provide strong convergent evidence that NHL players certainly consider the time when deciding to engage in fighting. They are significantly more likely to fight early in the game and in the preseason rather than at times when the score is most meaningful, namely, when the game is close to the end of regulation or during the postseason. In fact, NHL players are least likely to fight during the eventual Stanley Cup Finals championship series. In the 10 years covered, a fight erupted on average only in 1 of every 8 games (percentage of fights occurring over the number of games played).¨ (National Library of Science, 2013). This evidence shows
In his article“ Should Bodychecking Be Banned?”, Kolby Solinsky insists the justification of bodychecking in sports. The author argues about the idea of Canadian Association, which prohibit bodychecking in the House Leagues. According to his personal experience, Solinsky indicates that he was fond of bodychecking in spite of his lack of physical qualification in his house league; moreover, Solinsky mentions bodychecking in terms of a way to improve himself saying “I wouldn’t have been a real hockey player without contact-without hitting and beng hit.” Additionally, the author addresses the implication of body checking in case that it would be prohibited to prospective youth player. He proposes that these children will always feel cheated
From the ice to the E.R.: Reasons Why Body Checks Were Banned in Ontario Youth Hockey by the OHF Body checking plays a large part in the game of hockey. It is used to separate the player with the puck from the puck. Body checking is used in the NHL, in the minor leagues such as the Ontario Hockey League (OHL), Western Hockey League (WHL) and Quebec Minor Junior Hockey League (QMJHL), in minor travel hockey, and, up until the 2011-2012 season, it was used in house league divisions from Peewee and up all across Ontario. It is an integral part of the game; therefore, the question is compelling: why was bodychecking banned from house league hockey in the province of Ontario?
Direct violence is of course, one-on-one physical violence, which is not present in this conflict. But what is present is both structural and cultural violence. Structural violence is described by Burton as damaging deprivations caused by the nature of social institutions and policies. (Burton 1979) The players are suffering not only as a result of the NFL’s suppression of information about the extent of damage done by MTBI but also the NFL’s protocol for dealing with concussed players and their return to play.
It’s also a way of life, many players are “enforcers” by profession. Sure they may have a hockey jersey on, but they aren’t out there to put points on the board, they get paychecks for fighting and hitting hard. Smith, Bobby. "End to Fighting Would Not Make Hockey a Safer Game." The Globe and Mail.
Keeping players in check during the game, either from dirty plays or bad attitudes, displays why fighting remains necessary in the hockey world and needs to stay that way. Fighting has been involved with hockey for quite some time now. While there are many arguments about the danger and overall relevance of fighting, it is needed in other aspects of the game. It is inevitable in a game this widespread that
The players’ only goal is to win, no matter what it takes, and they will prepare for the win. All of the red flags thrown in a game means that the player played too
First off I believe that fighting in hockey increases game entertainment and draws in fans. A poll online showed that a majority of fans opposed a ban. Sean McIndoe says “Three hours later, the incident has 1 million views on YouTube. Every second member of the hockey media writes identical anti-fighting columns, which nobody reads.” This is important because it shows what the fans think of fighting in hockey.
High hits and highstick to pucks in the face will all start more injuries and will need to be taken seriously because it will all be new to the visor playes. This is a serious thing that cant be just a joke to the kids playing. Getting hit high is a big deal that can lead to injuries. from concussions to bleeding it’s a serious matter. Matt Calvert was hit in the face with a slapshot this season and had to leave and get 36 stitches in his face.
There is a huge issue with domestic violence in the National Football league. It is the NFL’s number one off the field issue, as domestic violence keeps occurring in the player’s lives. Football players are abusing their kids, wives, and girlfriends every day and are going on to play in an NFL game where they are being cheered on instead of punished. Domestic violence has been going on for years, but just now has become more of a problem that it
In the article titled "Offensive Play" published in 2009 by the New Yorker, Malcolm Gladwell argues that NFL players, in particular linemen, and dogfighting resemble due to the amount of violence that has been done to their bodies and the long-term effects they acquired from the amount of violence. However, this analogy that Gladwell presents throughout the article that can be viewed as a false dichotomy. Gladwell deftly manipulates his audience into believing in the analogy by the end of the article, but the truth is that the analogy is far off because of player have an option of choice. Gladwell makes this analogy hard to follow throughout the article because of spiraling transitions between subject focus.
Throughout history, there has been a consistent pattern of violence in sports. Boxing, wresting, and MMA are all example of fighting as a sport. Violence is also scattered into other sports such as football, ice hockey, and even soccer to some extent. In 1962, Norman Cousins wanted the public to distinguish the violence. He wrote an essay to inform everyone about the unacceptable risks associated with sports.
NHL Fighting Research Essay Since 1922, fighting has been in the NHL rulebook as an official part of the game. Fighting brings in thousands of people that are not necessarily big hockey fans, because of its intense, exhilarating, and fun aspect in the sport of hockey. People come to watch the big team enforcers go out on the ice to send a message or change momentum in the game, and the crowd loves it. Movies have been made about just fighting in hockey, where actual hockey skill was irrelevant, and fisticuffs was the reason they were playing.
Fighting in hockey Introduction: Should fighting in hockey be allowed. Fighting in hockey brings alot of attention to the game. Fighting in hockey should be allowed because it brings alot of entertainment and is fun to watch. They should fight in hockey because it brings alot of entertainment to the game and all the fans really enjoy watching it. Fighting in hockey should be allowed because allowing them to fight its safer because it holds them accountable, by them fighting it makes the fans more interested in the game because there is action, and fighting is a hockey tradition and is an unwritten law its in the official rules, however, fighting in hockey also gives a bad example to kids.
Contact sports are the reason kids are getting hurt. Contact sports are good for kids. The Federal and state government should stop kids under 10 to stop playing contact sports because 45% of kids under 10 getting hurt are from contact sports and 5% of the time its ending that kids chances to play sports in the feature, Not to mention contact sports can also make kids go to their fullest and being burned out and although contact provide some kids will useful tools in life most of the time there is more negative than positive.
If the NHL wants to grow, they can’t get rid of fighting, as it is one of the few things that casual sports fans find exciting about the game. Travis Hughes, SB Nation hockey writer, argues, "Fighting exists in hockey because we enjoy watching people fight. " If fighting was disallowed, the game would lose a major fan factor. As one of the biggest factors in hockey, fights change the flow of games and even seasons for teams. One case of this is happening right before our eyes.