What Is The Theme Of Two Years Are Better Than Four By Liz Addison

1408 Words6 Pages

My comparison analysis is based on the stories, “ Two Years Are Better Than Four” by Liz Addison and “Should Everyone Go to College?" by Stephanie Owen and Isabel Sawhill. Each story personally analyzes and describes how college can be a blessing to those who want an educational degree in 2 to 4 years in the field of their choosing or a curse to those who only strive for the experience. While Addison focuses more on her philosophy about community college, she talks about its lack of notice and appreciation. I strongly feel that she expresses good viewpoints as to how you will benefit no matter the number of years you attend college. She simply continues to say that community college is available to those who so blatantly feel the need to express …show more content…

Owen and Sawhill mention that “In the longer run, colleges need to do more to ensure that their students graduate, particularly the lower income students who struggle most with persistence and completion” ( Sawhill and Owen 24). It’s not only low-income students who struggle the most with academic steadiness but it is however known that they don't get the proper assistance when it comes to education. This factor ties into federal grants and loans, without the proper assistance students, sign up for loans thinking that the worry for funds is covered, but …show more content…

“Two Years Are Better Than Four and Should Everyone Go to College?” Having a college education no matter the degree pathway is the end goal for someone who wishes to have a long-term career, the best possible choice is to invest in a community college according to both authors. You will still be able to indulge in your self-discovery and experiences. Sawhill and Owen concluded that “A bachelor’s degree is not a smart investment for every student in every circumstance and therefore there should be more good alternatives to a traditional academic path, including career and technical education and apprenticeships” (Sawhill and Owen, 2013). They go into the depth that the government needs to create more tools for students to succeed in education. Going to college for four years at a time is not necessary anymore for some folks. This collides greatly with Addison's end conclusion “ I believe it should be celebrated as such. “For those who find it necessary to go to a two-year college,” begins one University of Privilege admissions paragraph”(Addison, 2007). She signifies that Mr. Perlstein was completely wrong about college not holding importance anymore, it does hold importance and allows for self-segregation to be abolished, all you have to do is start. Both citations show that everyone inevitably can go to college and become successful, all paths that lead to your

Open Document