Alexander the Great is one of the most famous people in our world’s history. He achieved great challenges no other man could do. Alexander himself said, “There is nothing impossible to him who will try.” His achievments prove this quote without a doubt. Alexander of Macedon was born in 356 BCE to King Philip and his wife Olympia. His parents hired the philosopher Aristotle to educate Alexander in subjects such as politics, sports, and warfare. He grew a strong opinion of himself as the outcome of his education. He then concluded to the belief that he was a god. When Alexander’s father died, he inherited his army and his quest to conquer Persia. He successfully lead the army through the Persian Empire and conquered thousands of square miles …show more content…
When he encountered Porus at the Hydapses River, he engaged with him in an interesting way. Alexander realizes he cannot cross over the to where Porus was because of his numerous amount of elephants. Alexander decided to trick Porus into battle, and while he did that, he would take Porus’ elephants and use them as his own weapon. (Arrianus, document B). Alexander uses his creativeness to defeat an opponent in a way that would be difficult today. This proves that Alexander was creative because he looked on the other side of thing by using his opponents weapons to fight that opponent. In document A, the map shows that Alexander conquered a lot of land, but he did something to add onto that. Alexander named 11 cities “Alexandria,” clearly named after himself. (Alexander’s Empire, document A). Alexander shows creativeness by naming cities after himself. By doing this, it reminds people that this is his land. This proves that Alexander is creative because it not only reminds the Macedonians of his land, it reminds historians and other people in the present about his empire. In conclusion, it is clear that Alexander is extremely …show more content…
Most cities surrendered to Alexander without a fight. When Alexander reached the city of Tyre, they did not surrender because they believed that they were unconquerable, due to their protection by walls and location of an island. Alexander decided that their answer was not acceptable. Therefore, he began to build a causeway into Tyre that would allow Alexander and his army to enter the city. When Tyre held out for seven months, Alexander responded with violence. (Green, document C). Although some have argued that Alexander lacks concern, he did show empathy as well. Alexander may have used violence against Tyre, but he spared the lives of some people in return. In document C, the author says, “The great city...was now utterly destroyed. Her king, Azimilik, and other various notables including envoys from Carthage had taken refuge in the temple of Melkart, and Alexander spared their lives.” (Green, document C). Alexander may have just destroyed a city for his empire, but he showed concern by sparing the lives of those who took refuge. This proves that Alexander shows concern because the least he could do in the situation was make sure the victims were okay, and he did that. He spared the lives of the victims who took refuge. Clearly, there are reasons Alexander could be considered not great, but he shows outstanding qualities that prove
Alexander was able to lead the kingdom of Macedon to victory towards the “Thracian people called the Maedi” (Jarus) and renaming the city Alexandroupolis. Not only does this demonstrate his confidence as an individual, but
The remaining citizens became slaves (Doc. C). Alexander shows compassion because one member’s loyalty saves the entire family. His tactic definitely worked and gave people a reason to be loyal. If he massacred all of the city, then people would have seen him as a cruel tyrant and grown to hate him which would lead to mutinies and rebellions. He also proved to his subjects that he was more than a boy, he was a man.
The first reason why Alexander the Great was really great is because he was able to blend two cultures. “ He hoped that Greek ideas, customs, and traditions would blend with the diverse cultures of the people
Alexander the Great showed leadership during his time as King of Macedonia. The map in Document A shows how Alexander had defeated strong Persian resistance and conquered much of Asia, labeling each of his new found cities Alexandria. His strong leadership skills led him to many more successes as well. Alexander the Great built his empire in 11 years and founded 70 new cities (Document E). This evidence support how Alexander
(Doc. B). This empire had not messed with him or affected him conquering land, but Alexander saw an opportunity and jumped at it first chance he saw. Alexander did not think about the negative affect that was created by him conquering all this land, he just saw the opportunity to become more powerful, and make his empire one of the biggest. He wanted to set a legacy for himself, and did not care about how everyone else was
Alexander the great was a king of macedonia. He was the son of king philip. People argue if he was great or not, i believe he wasn’t great. I can prove this by using evidence from; background essay, legends of the helmet, and the destruction of tyre.
He also respected his empire. Alexander would honor his empire even if he was outnumbered. He still wanted to fight because be believed that they
Alexander the Great Alexander the Great, a powerful leader, is one of the most famous people in history. Alexander the Great was born in 356 BCE in a kingdom of Greece called Macedonia. Alexander inherited the kingdom at 20 years old when his father, King Philip, was assassinated. This left Alexander to conquer and expand his empire. (BGE)
Plutarch, a historian, stated that “When he came to Thebes, … the city … was sacked and razed. Alexander’s hope being that so severe an example might terrify the rest of Greece into obedience,”. This shows us an example of Alexander’s logic of how he took power which is not rational and peaceful in any way. Alexander should have tried to gain the trust of Thebes instead of terrifying them into his
One of Alexander’s first military feats was the battle against the Macedonians and the Thebans. The Thebans were bitter about the treatment they had received from Alexander’s father, Phillip. Phillip had held Thebans prisoners and even executed some of them. So when Alexander became the new Macedonian king after his late
Alexander the Great has been regarded by many historians as a great person. Many historians say that he spared some people. Since he spared only some people, many other people were dead or killed because of him. Alexander the Great wasn’t great at all. He was a greedy and insensitive human.
Long ago, back into the time of ancient Greek, was a young 20 year old British Macedonian king called Alexander. He was a very brave, dauntless, and generous man to his followers. He had conquered a vast of land and made it his empire. He had found 70 cities and named most of them Alexandria. He spread Greek ideas and culture to the world.
Did you know that Alexander the Great was one of the greatest conquers? Alexander was born in 358 B.C. and he lived in a kingdom in Greece called Macedonia. Alexander was the son of the King Phillip II, and Alexander became king. During his life, did Alexander show enough leadership, courage, and concern for others to be considered great? By these measures, Alexander was great for at least three reasons: military genius, inspiring leader, and spread of Greek cultures.
Alexander the Great; Really not so great Alexander the Great lived from 356 BCE to 323 BCE and made an impact on Greek culture. He conquered all of Persia, rode a horse that no one else could ride, and spread Greek culture everywhere he went. All of that sounds good, but is it really great? The question is; was Alexander really that great?
After his early death at the age of 33, Alexander left behind a vast empire stretching from Greece to northwestern India. In addition to his empire, however, Alexander also left a lasting impression on the world as a military leader and king. Even today Alexander remains a respected historical character, considering that his military strategies are still used in modern warfare. This paper thus attempts to answer the question what lasting impacts Alexander the Great had on future generations. In doing so this paper will examine three aspects of Alexander the Great: his personality, his military skills and, lastly, the resulting cultural impact of his conquests.