Disruptive Innovation
Xiaomi is often mentioned in the context of disruptive innovation. But does Xiaomi qualify?
Figure 2.0 (Christensen ) https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/book/the-encyclopedia-of-human-computer-interaction-2nd-ed/disruptive-innovation
The theory of disruptive innovation was introduced by Clayton Christensen, of Harvard Business School, in his book “The Innovator’s Dilemma” (1997). Disruptive innovation describes a process by which a product or service takes root initially in simple applications at the bottom of a market and then relentlessly moves up market, eventually displacing established competitors. Most companies pursue innovations that will help them sustain the higher tiers of their markets, most
…show more content…
It´s important to remember that disruption is positive for the mass-market and are innovations that make products and services more accessible and affordable, thereby making them available to a much larger population. When we look at the full extent of Xiaomi´s business model, we can clearly see how different and how disruptive it is. How does Xiaomi keep their prices at least 60% lower than their competitors? While Apple need to come up with a new model to maintain their high profits, Xiaomi have found a clever way to reach these profits without overserve the market with smartphones. For Xiaomi to sell high-end smartphones at such cost, Xiaomi keeps their models …show more content…
Knowing this, does Xiaomi meet the criteria for being a disruptive innovation? We feel that some criteria from both “new market” and “low-end” fits Xiaomi. When they first entered the smartphone market with their low price and e-commerce distribution strategy, they enabled the middleclass in China to access high-end smartphones. Xiaomi created low-end disruptive growth by targeting the price sensitive middleclass in China that did not need all of the functionality and could not afford the products that were available by the bigger companies. Furthermore, when Xiaomi expanded to new high-volume countries like India, Singapore and Malaysia, the market for high-end phones were rather non existent. Because Xiaomi´s products are so much more affordable, the market for high-end phones have changed. With their convenience and affordability, Xiaomi basically created a new mass market for smartphones in the emerging countries they´ve expanded
There are types of technology its consumers use on a daily basis such as cell phones. There are two leading phones that are being used which is Apple and Android. These brands are very competitive towards each other. They have almost looked very similar over the years. Both of these brands have drawn people in.
• Rivals face high exit barriers Very High Potential Entrant Pressure • High entry barriers • Strong product differentiation • Menus change constantly with
Threat of new entrants (Low) When looking at the threat of entry it would be considered to be relatively low. To enter into an industry that specialises in electronics requires high capital and it can be difficult to compete against current companies. Samsung Electronics have been able to maintain profitability through the differentiation in their products. Within their mobile industry the company often promote this with the release of the Samsung Galaxy S5 being offered as a “fitness phone” with the addition of “a growing range of smart wearables” being an example of
Q1a. MARKET STRUCTURE OF APPLE INC Apple Inc. operates different types of market structure in terms of their different products. In the smart phone business, they happen to be one of the major players with their different models of the “iphone” which makes them operate in an oligopolistic market. Oligopoly arises when there is an imperfect competition in which there are just few firms producing similar products. As a result of high competition, monopolies, interdependence among firms there are just a few big players having the market power and making it very difficult for new firms to penetrate the market with their products.
As a company dominated by and mostly of engineers, Nokia always cared about technical excellence. They developed a particular strength in making quality hardware even for the low-priced devices. As the company grew, Nokia also became more and more efficient in manufacturing their devices. Thanks to economies of scale and superb logistics, they were able to produce cheaper and quicker than their competitors and thus had a strong competitive advantage in the production of mobile phones. This wasn't an easy development and they had to go through a severe crisis in logistics and sourcing before to establish their competitive advantage.
Normally, consumers have unique needs that are not similar all the times. Therefore, the company must develop products that can address the unique concerns of the consumers. Evidently, Apple Inc. has been successful in the creating variety of products. However, pricing of the Apple Inc. products tend to limit the ability of buyers to purchase the products. While the company might justify the price of the products, setting the prices too high limits the ability of the willing buyer to purchase the
For example, the Nokia N-series is for the segment of students and teenagers. Nokia competes with blackberry through their E-series which offers a range of business phones, targeting the segment of corporate professionals. On the other hand Nokia also provides a range of premium and luxury phones by the name of “Vertu”, which targets the higher social class segment in the market. Positioning:
The paragraph above shows data of a comparison between Apple and Samsung. Apple retail was increasing over Samsung in the smartphone market. Samsung used to rule the mobile market until Apple started its iPhone series. Even now Samsung is trying to give a head to head competition with its new Note series. But Apple being Apple, think different (Apple's tagline) and released iPhone X to blow out every other phone from the market.
The company is coming up with the wide varities of range and also with a great option. • Demographic Segmentation : In these the micromax mobile are being used by the lower middle class so that they cant afford expensive instruments like Apple and Samsung. The micromax is having wide varities with many features unloaded in them which are there in the expensive cells they cant buy. Many youngster age 16 to 30 are using micromax who cant afford the cell phone which are too expensive.
“buffs” for e.g. customers which can be seen as innovators or early adopters and shoe high interest in every new release of Samsung. These customers are easily enthused by the new technologies like smartphones and other add ons as they are lee price sensitive. Following figure shows the dimension of value creation: Dimension of value creation Pricing tactics Since Samsung is present is present in so many product categories, the company follows a variety of pricing tactics the pricing strategies can be divided to match the product it used for. Skimming strategy with this strategy, Samsung brings a new product in the market, for e.g.S7 edge, initially it uses skimming price for the product, where it tries to get high value in the start before competitors catch the product.
This is achievable when a company shares a dynamic perspective. The key factors here are enhancement of dynamic capabilities to accommodate market trends, and extrapolations, where IBM could foresee major changes in the future. To succeed in dynamism, IBM must take the route of democratized innovations instead of the traditional innovation model. Though, it may take a while to curb the commoditization but it definitely will lead to a greater degree of differentiation. Once, the company starts analyzing the trends in customer future needs, the dynamic capabilities will automatically set in place, paving a smooth transition path for new products and innovations to be developed with a first mover
1.0 Introduction The main objectives of this report is to identify and critically evaluate the strategies used by a chosen Multinational Company (MNC) to internationalize. Firstly, this report will clearly analyzed the current internalization strategies that being used by the chosen Multinational Company (MNC) which is Lenovo Group Limited and its relationship with the theory of internalization. Secondly, a relevant of internalization strategies will be proposed in this report which is suitable for the internalization of Lenovo Group Limited.
Today, almost every person caries a smart phone with them and some can’t survive the day without it. There are many companies and manufacturers who build smart phones like the popular ones such as Htc, Nokia, Samsung, Apple, Huawei, Motorola, Sony and many more, but what makes those companies not alike are the phones they release through the years, but are they that different? To compare, let us take an example of two leading rival companies in the field of smart phones, Samsung and Apple, who newly released their flagship devices, the Samsung Galaxy Note 4 and the Apple iPhone 6 plus. The Samsung Galaxy Note 4 features a 5.7 inch Super Amoled touch screen, a 16 megapixel back facing camera, an octa core processor with 3 gb of Ram and a 3220 mah battery whereas the Apple iphone 6 plus comes with a 5.5 inch retina display touch screen, an 8 megapixel back facing camera, dual core processor with 1 gb of Ram and a 2915 mah
Regal Marine’s Mission The Company’s mission is to get their product lowering costs through marketing strategies with suppliers and with the highest possible quality. Regal Marine is a company where design, technology and business strategy are equally important to achieve its goal, increase sales and gain customer satisfaction. Strengths: 1. The company has position itself in super boat market where it specialized in the luxury performance boats 2.
Growing customer expectations result in shorter life cycle of products and this means that companies should make their processes more and more flexible adopting modularity and product platforms in order to overcome competitors. Companies who fail to meet dynamic customer needs are doomed to fail. To illustrate this we can consider Tata Motors that designed a car selling at $2500 having identified the need for cheap vehicles and introduced market-pull innovation. Though having some negative feedbacks on its security it is affordable for many families in India.