Ecocriticism, the connection of literature and nature, has become a vital tool in understanding novels. The terms that are a part of it help the reader not only to understand larger themes in the story, but also to understand the characters. Anthropocentrism is one of these terms and refers to a human centered point of view. Another is biocentrism, a view where humans are a part of the ecosystem that is nature. In Mary Shelley’s novel, Frankenstein, these terms can be used to understand the main character, Victor Frankenstein. By analyzing the text, it is apparent that Frankenstein is more anthropocentric than biocentric due to his view of nature as a resource for him to utilize and manipulate rather than a system that he is part of. Victor’s aspiration to …show more content…
However, when one analyzes the text through an ecocritical lens, it is clear that he is not an amazing intellectual, but rather a selfish person who cares only about his own gain rather than what is good for the entirety of the natural world. To begin, Victor desires to uncover “the secrets of nature”-even though they may not be his to discover. By setting out on the task to discover Earth’s mysteries, he depicts his belief that he is in control and has the right to find out what it is hiding. While his curiosity may be justifiable, his methods are not. He does not simply want to uncover the secrets, but rather to “penetrate” them. This aggressive diction reiterates Frankenstein’s belief that he has power over the natural world as one cannot force its way into something without having a tight grasp on it. Rather than holding the belief that he is a part of nature- the biocentric view- he sees himself as above it and as a resource for him to manipulate. Victor’s dedication to understand the world is recurrent throughout the story.
Throughout the novel, Victor Frankenstein’s worldview vaguely surfaces in various sections. Frankenstein, one of the main characters of the book, obtains worldly ideas from his fascinating experiences, friends, and heterogeneous studies. Following the formation of the monster, Victor experiences and feels numerous intense emotions and forms of stress, consequently leading to his death. Important and intriguing, his viewpoint of the world not only inspires many people all over the earth to discover his religious perspective on life, but to understand his different beliefs and learn from his numerous mistakes. Peculiarly, everyone seems to interpret, decipher and define his view of the world differently.
He so passionately seeks to bestow life upon the dead and it is this passion which drives him over the edge. Victor’s opposition of the fundamental laws of nature through him bringing life to the lifeless is what ultimately leads him to his own tragic downfall. One of Victor’s professors at the university of Ingolstadt, who was named M. Waldman, motivates him to pursue his callings in natural philosophy, which is seen as a dead form of natural
Frankenstein by Mary Shelley is a thematically engrossing novel that follows the treacherous narrative of protagonist Victor Frankenstein as he submits himself entirely to passion and the fervent desire to acquire natural knowledge and the resulting consequences that follow. The outcome of his ardent frenzy of discovery is a monstrous creation that he instantly regrets creating upon first sight. Throughout the Frankenstein novel, Victor and the monster engage in an everlasting mutual war that sets them at ends with each other through their personal pinings for the things that set them apart. It can be proven that throughout the novel the two protagonists come off as both intriguingly similar upon in-depth analysis and strikingly different on
Throughout ‘Frankenstein’, we discover that Shelley presents Victors responsibility as flawed, We see him as childish and unable to accept his failures and mistakes. Rarley does he accept the “demonical corpse” who is “more hideous than belongs to humanity”, as his creation. Rather than dealing with the conequences and raising the monster, as his father and god. He abanondens it into society. We Can look back into Victors childhood to see where he gained his original morals, and where the drive for the creation of the monster was.
This quote shows the peaceful and healing effects that nature has on the creature. Despite being rejected and ostracized by society, the creature finds comfort in the natural world, which provides him with food and shelter. In contrast, Victor, who has rejected the natural world in favor of science and technology, finds no solace and is consumed by guilt and
This quote sets the stage for the tragic events that will transpire later in the novel and foreshadows the perils that Victor Frankenstein will encounter as he seeks knowledge beyond the bounds of what is natural and safe. In the end, Shelley's use of foreshadowing in Frankenstein emphasizes the risks of pursuing science without taking the moral and ethical implications into account and serves as a warning against the idea of unchecked scientific
Frankenstein by Mary Shelley is a gothic novel that tells the story of scientist, Victor Frankenstein, and his obsession with creating human life. This leads him to creating a gruesome monster made of body-parts stolen from grave yards, whom upon discovering his hideousness, the monster seeks revenge against his creator, causing Victor to regret the creation of his monster for the rest of his life. Shelley uses the literary elements of personification, imagery, and similes to give a vivid sense and visualization of Victor Frankenstein’s thoughts and feelings as well as to allow us to delve deeper into the monster’s actions and emotions. Throughout the novel, Shelley uses personification of various forces and objects to reflect the effect in Victor’s actions.
Mary Shelley's iconic novel, Frankenstein, is often considered a cautionary tale about the dangers of scientific ambition. However, the novel's themes extend far beyond scientific advancement and delve into complex questions of social ethics. Shelley's portrayal of Victor Frankenstein's battle with unintentional egoism and his conscious struggles with Kantian first and second formulation highlights the ethical implications of science and technology; and the importance of social responsibility. "Frankenstein" can be connected to philosophical egoism, as both explore the concept of self-interest and the pursuit of personal satisfaction. Philosophical egoism is the theory that individuals always act in their own self-interest, motivated by the
The gothic fiction novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley centralizes on humanity and the qualifications that make someone human. The content of the novel Frankenstein depicts a monster displaying human traits that his creator Victor does not possess: empathy, a need for companionship, and a will to learn and fit in. Throughout the novel Shelley emphasizes empathy as a critical humanistic trait. The monster displays his ability to empathize with people even though they are strangers. On the other hand Victor, fails to show empathy throughout the novel even when it relates to his own family and friends.
Finally, throughout the book, the Creature is not referred to as a creation but rather a product, Victor’s property, thus reflecting the Marxist attitude towards it. It also well establishes the materialistic culture during the time, and Victor’s common interest for property, like the monster. In conclusion viewing literature from two or more different lenses proves that it changes crucial elements and meaning of the story. As mentioned previously Feminists link Frankenstein to several gender inequality issues, like Elizabeth being dependent to Victor.
In “Myth and Modern World” Campbell offers multiple relationships humans have with nature. He cites Chief Seattle stating “We are part of the earth and it is part of us.” (42), highly contrasting the adversarial relationship between humanity and nature defined by Frankenstein and “The Birthmark.” Campbell also mentions two other points of view that contrast the antagonistic relationship supported by Frankenstein and “The Birthmark.” In the Christian religion it is believed that nature is condemned and that humans have every right to manipulate nature as freely as humanity wishes because gave nature to them, giving humans, in this dynamic, full control over nature without consequences.
In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein brings his creation to life and has to endure the repercussions of his actions. While Victor is in fact human, the question of whether the creature or Victor is more human still stands. Humanity is demonstrated as compassionate in the book and monstrosity is the opposite. The creature is more human because of his developed personality and desire to be human. Victor, although born into a humane family, evolved into everything bad about humanity; he developed obsession, resentment, and manipulated life to conform to his idealities.
After close reading of the text critics and readers alike question whether it is possible that Victor Frankenstein and the monster come to mean the same thing, or that Frankenstein’s monster represents Victor’s monster within? One critic suggests "The boundaries between the human and the monster in Frankenstein remain problematically blurred.” Notably, Shelley draws parallels between the two antagonists by emphasising how they both have monstrous capabilities. Victor recognises that the two are deeply intertwined stating: ‘My own vampire, My own spirit let loose from the grave…’Shelley creates a psychological bond between monster and creator, the creature
The Duality of Nature in Frankenstein: From the dawn of human civilization, man has always been transfixed by the work of the natural world. He has told myths to explain it, and researched it endlessly to understand its power. In a way, human progress from small enclaves to powerful civilizations can be marked by the expansion of natural bounds. We have created vaccines to ward off disease, electricity to light the dark, and even genetically engineered new organisms to feed a massive and growing population. In the 19th century, the literary Romantic period seems to be a reaction to such progress.
“My duties towards the beings of my own species had greater claims to my attention, because they included a greater proportion of happiness or misery” ( Shelley 219 ). Although Victor felt he had a duty to his creation, he realizes his greater duty is to humankind. Now Victor’s necessity to try to take control over the situation comes out of the shadows and into the light of not only the read but Victor Frankenstein himself. Shelley has demonstrated the altering levels of responsibility to emphasize the consequences faced when dealing with a