The condition of Palestinian’s in Israel as a Jewish state is a questionable and ambiguous situation, as Palestinians are treated like 2nd class citizens; the Palestinians in Israel lived and still live under harsh military rule and occupation. Palestinians encountered many restrictions and obstacles on the freedom of movement, restrictions on freedom of press, and illegal confiscation of land and property. Under military law, Palestinians faced the distinct possibility of deportations, illegal detentions without trial, curfews, and house arrests; hence, Palestinian’s started growing frustrated of Israel’s relentless occupation, and as a result, they started several Civil Disobedience campaigns known as the Intifada or The Uprisings. Michael C. …show more content…
1-2-3-4). John Zeleznikow, Professor at Victoria University, narrates, “On September 28, 2000, Ariel Sharon, Prime Minister of Israel, along with a large escort of military, visited the site of the Dome of the Rock and Al-Aqsa Mosque, perceiving this as an assertion of sovereignty over the former site of the Temple, Palestinians revolted” (1260). The Prime Minister of Israel, Ariel Sharon, marched onto the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, where the 3rd holiest mosque to the Muslims is located and the symbolic heart of the conflict: He shouted, “The Temple Mount is in our Hands.” The Palestinian’s and the Muslim world erupted with anger and rage; the clashes took a turn for the worst, when a peaceful protest was ambushed with bullets fired by the Israeli forces, killing seven. This is where the Second Intifada would begin; the Peace Process was back to square one and at an all-time low after violent clashes across the territories would last for the next 5 years (“Remembering the second intifada”
Something must be done about their situation. Both the Jewish people and the Palestinian people have lost too many sons and daughters and have shed too much blood”(144). The Jews often got frustrated at themselves and other people. Jews found themselves hopeless around the clock in the concentration camps. Hopelessness ia very troubling thing to have.
Under slave-labor conditions, severely malnourished and decimated by the frequent selections, the Jews take solace in caring for each other, in religion, and in Zionism, a movement favoring the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine, considered the holy land. The prisoners are forced to watch the hanging of fellow prisoners in the camp courtyard. They even hang small child. Because of the horrific conditions in the camps, many of the prisoners begin to slide into cruelty, concerned only with personal survival. Sons begin to abandon and abuse their fathers.
The relationship between a government and its citizens must maintain the perfect balance between giving and taking. The relationship consists of constant checks and balances; however, it normally goes awry because either the disobedience is ineffective, or the authority is tyrannical. Typically, the relationship between a government and its citizens holds tension. The tension in the relationship stems from poor communication. Citizens communicate their grievances to the government through disobedience; therefore, the government communicates back by reestablishing order.
Israel is a sign of the Jewish transformation from helpless to self independence. '' Three times a day they prayed for the restoration of Jerusalem... These problems will not arise if a home be found for them which will be legally recognized as Jewish” ( Source G). The Jewish people went from praying for the restoration of their nation to being given one recognized as a Jewish state. They were given an opportunity to rebuild themselves, their families, and their religion in a new peaceful country long dreamed of. "...shown during two thousand years of appalling and suffering… the new Jewish state, with its superior institutions had become a reality” ( Source D ).
I consider civil disobedience to be an easily-ignored pillar upon which our democracy was founded. In fact we are only established as a nation now because our founding fathers engaged in civil disobedience themselves. We were in a “social contract” of sorts with Great Britain and when we felt that they had not upheld their part of the contract (they did not allow us to create courts to maintain order, or to create a navy to defend ourselves, or to sustain our economy due to an inability to trade with any other countries), Thomas Jefferson concluded that it was our not only our right, but also our duty to break away. And it was Thomas Jefferson that combined all of the works of the great thinkers before him such as Thomas Hobbes, John Locke
The question of whether or not peaceful resistance toward the law impacts society in a positive way is really a question of circumstance. If I were to refer back to the historical aspects of the subject, then my immediate answer would be yes, it does; peaceful resistance has often prevailed in situations that required immediate attention, yet were simply overlooked by the general public, despite their importance. One extremely important example of this would be the many boycotts during the civil rights movements of the 60's. Civil disobedience was a way to communicate the true inequality represented by the phrase, ''separate but equal'' by peacefully marching for their beliefs. For example, many white officials used various schemes to prevent
The greatest revolutionaries of the United States of America, both past and present, answer to values, principles of American culture and widely-accepted beliefs. They do not answer to laws. The belief that obedience to laws is a sign of patriotism is deeply flawed in the fact that the original patriots of the thirteen colonies were everything except obedient to their government. In the ideal democracy, the core values, moral justices, of the people will be reflected in the laws of the nation. When a split in laws and moral justice occurs, it is the right and obligation of the people of said nation to act as Samuel Adams, John Hancock, and Thomas Jefferson; it is their duty to disobey.
And Palestine must become a Jewish homeland! We have suffered enough!” pg.197 As a Zionist, he believes that one must fill their life with meaning and make a difference in the world. This is his view of living as a Jew. Despite being chosen, he decides how he will choose to live with what's chosen for him.
I believe peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society. As citizens of the United States, we are born with certain natural rights. According to John Locke, an eighteenth century philosopher, natural rights are not bestowed by the government, but inherited by birth by virtue of the fact that we are human beings. These natural rights include life, liberty, and property. He theorized that the purpose of government was to protect those rights; and if it did not, it would lose its legitimacy and need not be obeyed.
Civil disobedience has been an enormous event throughout American history, but is currently increasing in our daily lives. I believe that protesting against the laws in a peaceful manner is an appropriate and a brilliant idea to get your opinions across to the American people. If certain causes or people are violent about their opinions, nobody would want to follow them because of the ignorance involved. When I see violence in a protest, I instantly disagree with their fight due to the forcefulness and viciousness of their cause. We need to conduct ourselves in a professional manner when expressing what we believe in, if you do not, people will not take you seriously.
They call him the father of the Palestinian nation, this is a war criminal who was sought for war crimes," said the Israeli leader. Netanyahu maintains government position Prime Minister Netanyahu meanwhile reiterated his position that Palestinian incitement - not Israeli policies - were at the root of the current violence. He urged the international community to tell Palestinian President Abbas to stop "incitement" of what he condemned as terrorism, which he had earlier vowed to fight at all costs.
People's justification to engage in civil disobedience rests on the unresponsiveness that their engagement to oppose an unjust law receives. People who yearn for a change in a policy might sometimes find themselves in a dead end because their “attempts to have the laws repealed have been ignored and legal protests and demonstrations have had no success” (Rawls 373). What Rawls says is that civil disobedience is a last option to oppose an unjust law; therefore, providing civil disobedients with a justification for their cause. Civil disobedience is the spark of light that people encountered at the dead end and they hope that this spark of light will illuminate to show that an unjust law should not exist at all. Martin Luther King, Jr, in his “Letter from
Martin Luther King Jr. was a widely known minister, activist and political leader in the American history. But he excelled for his role in the Civil Rights Movement, which was a way of civil disobedience. When arrested and held prisoner in Birmingham jail for protesting without a permit King wrote the famous Letter from Birmingham Jail as a response to the Clergymen that argued that the problem of racism should be solved by the locals and King and his people were just ‘outsiders’ causing more trouble and that he wasn’t following the protocol for civil disobedience. In his letter King stated that he and his people tried countless times to talk to the authorities but were ignored and were ‘victims of false promises’ every time; this didn’t leave
This course of action similarly enhances tension between idealistic Muslims who continue to stay devoted to their religion, and hence find a means to project that through radicalized courses of actions. The product of conflict is danger to entirety of the group involved, and hence it is best to find sympathy and solidarity between the oppressed and
The Wall also was a reason and a geographic factor for the Separation of Palestinian families. On the other hand, people who live in the western side of the Wall suffered from daily and serious problems. Passing through gates everyday forced a large number to leave education. For example, the Palestinian village “Barta'a” which surrounded by the Wall and gates doesn’t have schools for high students, that forced many of the students especially girls to leave their schools and not completing the university education. As well as school teachers suffered from indignation and soldiers hatred at checkpoints, in this context the education of girls and women was the more areas affected, due to fear on them pushed some families to force and prevent their daughters from going to schools and completing their education.