Mr. Williams was arrested for abducting a ten-year-old girl in Des Moines, Iowa. Prior to the kidnapping, Williams had recently escaped from a mental hospital. Williams called a Des Moines lawyer and informed him that he’d like to turn himself in. The lawyer advised Williams that he would represent him as soon as he got back to Des Moines, however, while he was in Davenport he would call a lawyer he knew to represent him for the time being. He then advised Williams to turn himself in to the Davenport police. A Davenport lawyer represented Williams during his arraignment there. After his arraignment, Williams was to be driven back to Des Moines by the Des Moines chief of police and a police detective named Leaming. The officers transporting Williams agreed not to question him during the duration of the trip. …show more content…
They then set out on the 160-mile drive. Leaming attempted to converse with Williams several times but Williams insisted that he would tell the whole story once they arrive in Des Moines and he confers with his lawyer. However, Leaming had did his research and knew that Williams was a deeply religious man. As Leaming and Williams began to talk about religion, Leaming started referring to him as “Reverend” to gain his respect. He then suggested that it was important that the police locate the girl’s body so that she will get a proper Christian burial. Subsequent to Leaming’s “Christian burial speech”, William’s began to lead the officers to the body. The girls body was found and Williams was tried and convicted of
Cedar Rapids v. Garrett F. Garret F., was a quadriplegic who was ventilator-dependent due to his spinal column being severed in a severe motorcycle accident when he was 4 years old. During the school day, he required a personal attendant within hearing distance to see to his health care needs. He required urinary bladder catheterization, suctioning of his tracheostomy, observation for respiratory distress, and other assistance. He attended regular classes in a typical school program and was successful academically.
Assignment One 1. In the case of Missouri v. Seibert, the court examines the death of Mrs. Seibert’s son, Johnathon who was mentally handicapped and neglected by his mother. When she noticed her son had died in his bed, she knew he was to be covered in bed sores, and she believed the police would see the neglect. She created a plan with her other two sons and their friends to light the home on fire. This would cover up the neglect, since his body would be burned, and they also left Donald Rector, a mentally ill teenager, in the home to make it seem as if Johnathon was being cared for at that time.
Lawrence v. Texas 539 US 558 (2003) Case Facts: In September 1998, a same-sex couple in Houston, Texas were arrested in their own apartment after police found them engaging in a consensual, intimate, sexual act. The two men, John Lawrence and Tyron Garner, were convicted of violating the Texas “Homosexual Conduct” Law, which made it a Class-C misdemeanor for same-sex adults to engage in sexual intercourse and considered it illegal sodonomy. The statute was created in 1973 after the state changed its criminal code to end the banning of heterosexual anal or oral sex. The sheriff deputies arrested and charged the couple for performing “deviate sexual intercourse” as listed in the mentioned in the Texas statute.
In the case of Johnson v. Laverkin City, a married police officer was punished for having an affair with another married officer from another department while attending a training conference. Sharon Johnson was a police officer for the Laverkin City Police Department. While employed, Ms. Johnson separated from her husband and filed for divorce in 2003. Her husband reacted negatively by violating a protective order and threatening to kill himself and her. While dealing with the divorce, Ms. Johnson was sent to a police training conference and while she was there, she had an affair with another officer that was from a different department.
MILLERSBURG — Looking into the face of the man she assaulted, a Killbuck woman who was high on LSD when she became violent with a Holmes County Sheriff 's deputy responding to a disconnected 9-1-1 call in October, said she was sorry. Kaetlyn M. Weber, 20, of 424 S. Main St., previously pleaded guilty in Holmes County Common Pleas Court to a single count of assault. The charge is made a fourth-degree felony because the victim, Mike Williams, was acting in the capacity of a deputy at the time. “You didn 't I was real,” Williams told Weber of the moment he found her wandering in the middle of a bean field. And, while he tried to reassure her he was there to help, “You got violent with me
Worcester v. Georgia By Sydney Stephenson Worcester v. Georgia is a case that impacted tribal sovereignty in the United States and the amount of power the state had over native American territories. Samuel Worcester was a minister affiliated with the ABCFM (American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions). In 1827 the board sent Worcester to join its Cherokee mission in Georgia. Upon his arrival, Worcester began working with Elias Boudinot, the editor of the Cherokee Phoenix (the first Native American newspaper in the United States) to translate religious text into the Cherokee language. Over time Worcester became a close friend of the Cherokee leaders and advised them about their political and legal rights under the Constitution and federal-Cherokee treaties.
Bradwell v. Illinois (1873) Myra Bradwell applied for a license in order to practice law in the State of Illinois in which she resided in. She included proof of the qualifications that she possessed in order to be able to practice law and also filed an affidavit which stated that she was born in Vermont but is now a citizen of the U.S. Bradwell’s license was refused because she “as a married woman would be bound neither by her express contracts nor by those implied contracts which it is the policy of the law to create between attorney and client.” Bradwell didn’t give up there; she then filed a printed argument stating her right to practice law. The court replied to her argument by saying that the privilege that they had of giving licenses
The following is a summary of Kansas v. Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346 (1997), including information pertaining to the facts of Hendrick’s criminal history, the procedural history of the cases leading up to the Supreme Court decision, the issues surrounding the Supreme Court decision, and the precedent that has been set for future similar cases. Leroy Hendricks, the subject of this legal matter, is an individual who has exhibited a pattern of inappropriate sexual behaviors throughout his lifetime. Hendricks claims that his sexual misconduct first began in 1950 when he was twenty years old and he exposed himself to two females; shortly after in 1957 he received a criminal charge for indecent exposure, for exposing himself to another female victim.
Introduction On 22nd August, 2002, a young woman Michelle Knight is in a hurry to attend a social services meeting to discuss her son’s custody. Unfortunately she does not know the directions to that place. She walks into a convenience store to get the directions. Unknown to her, someone was listening.
Introduction: You are sitting at your desk, taking notes from a teacher, and learning about the Revolutionary war. All of a sudden, you are banned from school and ripped from your studies, all because you believed in Gandhi’s non-violent movements. This same case happened to the Tinker students in Des Moines, Iowa. In the year 1965, the time of the Vietnam war, a group of students came together and wore black armbands with a white peace sign embeded on the side. These armbands were banned by the principals and the school board, with the punishment of suspension until the student was willing to take the armband off.
Arthur O'Grady and Selma In Dogless County a man named Arthur O'Grady is the assistant deputy attorney for the county. The most recent case on his list was that of a local woman named Selma. She is charged with lewd conduct for her solicitation of prostitution. O'Grady has known Selma for a long time and is fully aware of her behavior.
The precedent was set in Terry v. Ohio, when the courts ruled that it was sensible for an officer to carry out a restricted search and, if required, seizure of weaponries on an individual that the officer realistically considers could be armed. The result of the Terry case was useful in the case of Michigan v. Long. In this particular case, the standard of the police search in the Terry case was expanded to include motor vehicles. According to the Michigan v. Long case, the court ruled that the police were within their rights of conducting a “Terry’s” search of the person of interest vehicle. In this case, the evidence gained from the search was not discarded as a violation of the person’s Fourth Amendment, but rather seen as being prudently
Tinker v. Des Moines the Court ruled that students have a right under First Amendment to wear black armbands while being in school. Since Susie Speeker held up a sign with message at the event promoting illegal drug use, Principal Pat Strickland suspended Susie for ten days. School’s policy allowed suspension only those who “use, advocate or promote the use of any illegal drug at a school function.” Susie’s intention by holding the sign was not to promote illegal drug use but because of her mother was a breast cancer survivor and they believe that marijuana should be legalized only for compassionate use.
“There comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular, but he must take it because conscience tells him it is right. ”(Martin Luther King, Jr.) Most people were racist but now since the civil rights have been established most have stopped being racist and moved on. Three supreme court case decisions influenced the civil rights movements by letting more and more poeple know what the Supreme Court was doing to African Americans,and of the unfair him crow laws:(Dred Scott v. Sanford,Plessy v. Ferguson,Brown v. Board of Education). Dred Scott v. Sanford Is a case that most people felt that Dred Scott had an unfair charge against him.
Demaryius woke up one Saturday morning to aloud pounding on the front door he peeked outside his front window to see copsguns in hand. He walked outside out of confusion he sees his mom in handcuffsand police dogs sniffing the front yard and just as if things can’t get any worsetheir school bus starts to pull up. His mother asks the cops if she can get her kidsready for school the officers says that she can. While she was helping her kidsonto the bus she began to tell them that everything was going to be okay this wasnot true and as it turned out they have also arrested their grandmother as wellDemaryius mother while in court was offered a plea deal the deal was that if shegave her testimony against her mother she would receive a shorter sentence sherefused the deal and later was given a 20 year sentence for housing and intent todistribute crack and cocaine and at the time when she was serving in an interviewover the phone she said that, “it was either put my mother there, but on theother hand I have my kids I believe it was a lose lose situation. The news crew thatinterviewed her asked her if she regrets not talking the offer she said, “That one isstill a no” they followed up with a different question, “what would you have donedifferently?”