ipl-logo

Disadvantages Of Third Party Candidates

504 Words3 Pages

A citizen would not be wasting their vote by voting for a third party candidate because it is not a waste of a vote if they believe in the person you vote for or if they believe it is the right choice. For example if the citizen agrees with the candidates policies they will be voting for the right reasons. This is because they are not voting for anyone just because they are popular and are said to win. A citizen should want their message to be advocated to america through someone who believes in their message. That someone will promote issues that the citizens want to be heard. The citizen would be voting for who they want instead of what others want which in the end is right.

Another reason is the third party candidate can be a better option compared to the running candidates of the two main parties. If the two main parties don't believe in the same policies then the citizen will have a third option. For example in the current debate the two main parties have candidates that the people disagree with yet they still support them because of the two party system. Yet they have an option of a third party candidate which will benefit the citizen in the hard decision of choosing the right candidate. …show more content…

This will force the two main parties to address issues that the third parties are promoting this will allow the third parties to have some of the popular attention. This will cause a surge of even more votes this will get them far in the electoral system. The citizen wouldn’t be wasting their vote because they will get their issues heard and that's basically the end

Show More
Related

  • The Pros And Cons Of Gerrymandering

    712 Words  | 3 Pages

    This puts more control in the hands of the primary voters instead of the general election voters. The result is that the extreme candidates in each party primary gets elected and then easily cruises to victory in the general

    Read More

  • Effects Of Theodore Roosevelt On The Election Of 1912

    578 Words  | 3 Pages

    Our political system is comprised of a two party system that has existed since our country's inception. While the Democrats and Republicans are the dominant parties, there are third-parties such as the Libertarians, the Tea Party, the Green Party and many others. While they are small and a third party candidate has never won a presidential election, they can have a significant effect on the outcome. Such examples include the Elections of 1912 and 1992, two years in which the election was changed by the actions of a third party candidate. This also applies to our current presidential election in which one of the Republican frontrunners, Donald Trump, has vowed to run as a third party candidate if he feels mistreated.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Electoral College

    1117 Words  | 5 Pages

    The thing is that using the winner-take-all system means that the smaller party gets fewer electoral votes, which also means the president that most the people chose emerges as a

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Electoral College

    660 Words  | 3 Pages

    It’s highly unlikely for the third-party to win, but if they managed to receive enough votes it would mean that neither of the two major parties wins the majority (241). In 1948, 1960, and 1968 third-parties have been able to receive electoral votes leaving the possibility that they shift and skew the major party candidate’s opinions and decisions. This is too much power for third-parties to just able to disrupt an election

    Read More

  • Should The Electoral College Be Abolished Dbq Essay

    658 Words  | 3 Pages

    The electoral college is unfair to the third party because they don’t get votes from the electoral college. Based on the presidential election from 1980 and 1992, it have show that the third party don’t get electoral vote(Doc B). The third party have a disadvantage which make it impossible for the third party to win the election because of the “winner take it all” system. According to George Will, he say that it discriminate smaller party and only help the main two parties(Doc E). The electoral college supports a two party system, discourages third party, and thereby restrict choices available to the

    Read More

  • Electoral College Be Abolished Dbq

    872 Words  | 4 Pages

    “In 1980 and 1992 the third party candidates received 6.6% and 18.9% of the popular vote but both received 0% of the Electoral Vote” (Document B). This is a significant difference of the popular vote and the electoral votes. It is not a correct representation of the citizens’ votes. Arthur Schlesinger wrote, “The abolition of state-by-state, winner-take-all electoral votes would speed the disintegration of the already weakened two-party system” (Document E). The Electoral College voters mostly belong to Republican and Democratic parties therefore they do not want a third party candidate to win.

    Read More

  • Why Some Obstacles Third Parties Face

    97 Words  | 1 Pages

    Some obstacles that third parties face include voters believing that their vote for a third party candidate is a waste, since that candidate is unlikely to win. Also, third parties usually focus on a single personality or a single issue and that can lead to less popularity among voters. However, the most significant obstacle a third party faces is the winner-take-all system, where in the majority of states, the presidential candidate gets all the state’s electoral votes with the highest percentage of votes. This basically takes all the chances of a third party wining a presidential election.

    Read More

  • Benefits Of The Third Party

    351 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Third Party presidential candidates are often overlooked, or not taken seriously. After careful consideration, and acquainting myself with the many different Third Party candidates, it would be my choice to elect Dr. Jilll Stein. Her strong stand on environmental issues coincides with my concerns and beliefs when it comes to green energy and conservation. According to her campaign website, she is also a supporter of plans that would provide jobs, basic living necessities in an attempt to end poverty, healthcare, free education, equality for all, and a cut in military spending (Jill2016.com). Jill Stein’s vision may seem far-fetched but I believe that it is this kind of innovative, and optimistic plan that would be the most beneficial to

    Read More

  • Advantages And Disadvantages Of Texas Government

    968 Words  | 4 Pages

    The main advantage is that it removes the concentration of power from one individual. This ensures that abuse of power is limited. Giving different individuals from varying parties will also result in the creation of checks and balances in the executive. A lieutenant governor from the Democratic Party will be able to check the activities and the undertakings of a Republican governor thus ensuring that they operate within the confines of the law and the powers of their office. Also, the system allows for the introduction or the enforcement of the manifestos held by both parties, thereby resulting in greater benefits to the population.

    Read More

  • The Influence Of Third Parties

    291 Words  | 2 Pages

    Was a vote for someone other than Bush or Gore in 2000 a wasted vote? Why or why not? Yes, because voting for a third party is a waste since most people are either democratic or republican. Statistically, third parties have little or no chance to winning.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of FPTP In Canada

    935 Words  | 4 Pages

    This has its pros and cons as parties such as Nazi parties can gain even a small amount of parties on the federal level, but it also allows for better representation of fringe groups that would otherwise never get much control in government. This problem has been answered by having a minimum percentage of the popular vote for a party to earn a seat.3

    Read More

  • Two Party System Essay

    941 Words  | 4 Pages

    If there was three parties, and one of the parties won the election by a slight ⅓ vote, it would not be a majority of the people. Therefore the country would turn from a democratic republic to a whole different, less inviting arrangement. For example, In Australia, they are run by a Multi-Party system. The Australian Labor Party won with 35% of the popular vote. In Two-Party systems, it needs to be 51%.

    Read More

  • Advantages Of The Two Party System

    2506 Words  | 11 Pages

    INTRODUCTION The United States political structure is one of the most conducive and great political system in the world. One of the most popular aspects of it is the two party system, and the well-known Democratic and Republican parties. There are three major party systems in the world and they are one-party system, two-party system and multi-party system. This essay will analyse the two party system in the United States (U.S.), their structure and the benefits of a two party system in a states.

    Read More

  • Majority Rule Advantages And Disadvantages

    1312 Words  | 6 Pages

    As a result, most voters could become disinterested in the democratic process because they have no meaningful way to express their true preferences. What could be worse is three

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay About Political Parties

    491 Words  | 2 Pages

    Americans strive to fight for what is right. Americans who vote will vote for the candidate who shares the same political views as the voter. It is fascinating how unconsciously Americans, as voters, oftentimes forget to take the time to contemplate why the candidate that shares the same views as us is right. Political parties have led us as a nation through dark times, such as the Great Depression, they serve as a vital lifeline for our government. Without any political parties there would be not representation, voting would become exceedingly complicated than it should be, our government would change entirely.

    Read More

More about Disadvantages Of Third Party Candidates

Open Document