Troy Davis went to court and it only took them a few hours of to plead that he was guilty. While the police officers were interviewing the witnesses of crime scene. Dorothy Fara was one of the witnesses for Troy Davis she told them she really did not see what happens. The police officer was then pressuring her to say that she saw Troy Davis do it. The police officer were putting her under so much pressure on her she felt if she did not say what they wanted to hear she would not have been able to leave.
Forensic and Behavioral evidence pointed convincingly to Wayne Williams as the murderer of eleven young men in Atlanta. In 2010, a DNA test was conducted on the scalp hairs found on a body dumped down a wooded slope behind an office park on February 13, 1981. It was of 11-year-old Patrick Baltazar. Inside the boy's shirt, two human scalp hairs were discovered. Although the results were not conclusive, the FBI's DNA laboratory listed the odds of 130-to-1 against the hairs coming from any person other than Wayne Williams.
Lawton opened each of his cases by calling the police dispatcher, who was on duty the night of the shooting. She reported a call from Jim Williams came through at 2:58, saying that he had just been in a shooting at his residence. Next came Joe Goodman, Who JIm called as soon as he had shot Danny, “ Goodman said that Williams had called him between 2:20 and 2:25 a.m. to say he had shot Danny,” ( Midnight in the Garden p 215). Jim didn’t call the authorities until 3:00 a.m. Therefore, the rest of Lawton’s witnesses gave testimony on what might of happened up to and during those thirty minutes before Williams decided to call the police.
Background The petitioner, Robert Leroy McCoy was arrested in May 2008 in Bossier Parish, Louisiana for three counts of first degree murder. There was an overwhelming amount of evidence pointing to McCoy committing the crime, but throughout the trial, McCoy maintained that he was innocent and gave multiple alibis. However, a person matching McCoy’s description was seen in a Kia fleeing the scene after the murder, and there were bullets matching the gun used in the crime were found in said car. Also, before the crime, one of the victims, Christine Colston Young, was heard in a 911 call just before the murder saying, “She {McCoy’s estranged wife, Yolanda Colston} ain’t here, Robert… I don’t know where she is. The detectives have her.
Mr. Williams was arrested for abducting a ten-year-old girl in Des Moines, Iowa. Prior to the kidnapping, Williams had recently escaped from a mental hospital. Williams called a Des Moines lawyer and informed him that he’d like to turn himself in. The lawyer advised Williams that he would represent him as soon as he got back to Des Moines, however, while he was in Davenport he would call a lawyer he knew to represent him for the time being. He then advised Williams to turn himself in to the Davenport police.
What made this a difficult case was the confusing testimony, lack of evidence, and the missing gun. But they weren’t sure if the conviction was going to be possible due to these obstacles. Steven Philips tried to put together the best case possible and present it before a judge and jury. Obstacles were going to be faced as they
The Emmett Till case should be taught in 2018 as not just a murder that triggered the civil rights movement, but as a case that still reflects the injustices that African American men face in the American Justice system. Not only should Emmitt till’s murder reflect the injustices in America today, but retaught since new information has recently surfaced which shows a different side to the whole case. Emmett Till was murdered on August 28, 1955 in Money, Mississippi and found beaten and floating in the local river. Emmett Till was murdered by Carolyn Bryant’s husband Roy Bryant and her brother-in-law Milam Bryant.
Law Officials who stopped Williams observed a 24-inch nylon cord matching the choked marked on Cater and other victims. His presence at the bridge two days
Not five, ten but more than fifteen little boys were found dead in a lake, but all of a sudden , Wayne Williams gets arrested and no more bodies are found. Guilty or Innocent?Through out the videos you can see more and more evidence to why he is very guilty. As stated in the article, only American African kids were being taken away from their homes,being taken from families, and no one knew why. No one, literally no one , had any idea on who was doing this and why they were doing this. Wayne was born on May 27,1958, he is known to be an American serial killer who convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment in 1982 for killing two adult man.
This led to a full investigation into Wayne and his house which belonged to his parents and his car. An article which shows the similarities between Wayne Williams
As you are shown in the film, after the identification of Brenton Butler and his so-called testimony to investigators, the police and prosecutors just stopped working on the case. Thus, evidence that would have supported Butler’s innocence and help find the actual killer weren’t discovered until Brenton’s defense attorney, Pat McGuinness did some investigation and research of his own. Thus, flowing from film from the trial to McGuinness’s investigation scenes shows the how he attained the information that he and his partner could present in the courtroom. While the prosecutors only had the one eyewitness, who claimed to have only caught a glimpse of the shooter and gave description that did not even match Butler. The film presents the conclusion that the police did not actually do the work to find the actual killer and if it wasn’t for Pat McGuinness and his partner wanting to find the culprit, it would never actually be solved.
Throughout the trial, I kept track of the general pros and cons of each side. I found the prosecution’s evidence to be more compelling in comparison to the evidence the defense presented. This is because the evidence the defense presented had more holes, and did not flow as well as the prosecution’s. However, the defense had better witnesses to support their argument than the prosecution. The use of the prosecution’s witnesses could have been better, and in the defense’s closing statement, they stated that the prosecution witnesses could be bias
Throughout the novel, people start acting different towards Atticus because of the Tom Robinson trial. A few days before the trial a good friend of Atticus tries to kill him with a group of white men to hurt Tom Robinson, but in between the situation Scout gets involved by talking to Mr. Cunningham casually and the men leave. It was one night when Atticus was acting up, of course because of the Tom Robinson case which is the night before but Jem, Scout and Dill knew something else was going on. A crowd of men and the sheriff, Heck Tate, go to Atticus’s house the day before the Tom Robinson trial.
There are many reasons for wrongful convictions, in the cases of Ronald Cotton, Christopher Abernathy, and Marvin Anderson, the main evidence that led up to their convictions were eyewitness testimonies. It is sad that people waste so many years of their lives due to false misconstrued information. Therefore, eyewitness testimonies should not be sufficient evidence to make a case. Fortunately, there have been innocent people exonerated and released from prison thanks to DNA testing. People should be cautious when making an eyewitness testimony, they should make sure that they are 100% sure that they are picking the right person.
