Prior to World War II (WWII), immigration processes were very selective. However, the aftermath of WWII left the Australian economy weak resulting in the immigration processes adapting to allow for a more immigration-accepting economy. Strategies such as guaranteeing employment, housing and education were applied to influence the international migration population. These strategies impacted the past Australian economy by influencing immigrants to come to a low populated Australia.
A major post WWII strategy used was guaranteeing the international immigration population employment, housing and in some cases, education which influenced them to come to Australia. For a fraction of this population, “the Commonwealth Government paid most of their
…show more content…
The demand for jobs was increasing due to the men leaving and fighting in the war (Old Treasury, n.d.). This initially gave way to women joining the workforce but also the newly arrived immigrants. The strategy was to ensure that all immigrants that came to Australia had to take up a job the Government gave. In the 1950’s and 1960’s, a group of immigrants from Greece, Croatia, Turkey and Malta seeking employment arrived in Australia (Thomson, 2014) which was ideal for the high demand of jobs required for developing the economy. With not only an increasing population but an employed one, unemployment rates dramatically reduced to a record of 0.95% post war (The Reserve Bank of Australia, 2017). This left the economy at its best regarding unemployment rates. The strategy to accept immigrants on the condition that they have to work a job assigned by the government was profitable as in the perspective of the immigrants, the government was offering guaranteed employment once they came so it was a mutual relationship when it came to profit. However, guaranteeing the fraction of unskilled immigrants with jobs was unbeneficial as it would’ve limited the type of work they could do. Unskilled immigrants would be given labour-based work which would solely rely on their physical …show more content…
A major factor that contributed to this was the immigrants as by settling in Australia, their lifestyle (income, education, etc) would dictate and set the tone for the future Australian economy. A strategy that was used to impact and influence the future of our economy was ensuring that immigrants arriving in Australia had an education. Depending on the field of their work, immigrants could be, both informally and formally, be given a choice to undertake an education. One of the branches of education involved “‘intensive courses'... aimed to equip professional and semi professional migrants with adequate English for employment” (Woden Community Services, 2018) which demonstrates how the education courses would help improve their working ability as communication skills are relevant in all industries. This concept is further reinforced by how workers in the Snowy Hydro Scheme had the opportunity to undertake courses that didn’t affect their working ability but rather followed their interests. According to Carlo Aggio “my first priority was to learn English… I studied mathematics and even astronomy” (Woden Community Services, 2018). This highlights how further education opportunities were offered. In addition, this could have provided the opportunity for them to change industries after the 2 compulsory years in the job assigned by the government. This
The impact of World war one on Australia can said to have changed dramatically, bringing Australia into a new era. At the start of the war, Australia
In 1850’s The White Australian Policy began to try and create anun-racial Australia. It was used against anyone who was non-European and those who were different colour races by refusing to allow them to enter the country. This policy succeeded and continued until the end of World War II. After WW2, Australia could no longer hold its position of isolation from the rest of the world. The war produced a refugee crisis that drove Central Europeans from a decimated Europe.
The Australian government control on the home front in World War one differed to the second World War in a variety of ways. In Australia, the home front played a significant role in both World Wars, with the citizens contributing to the war effort in a variety of ways. Three ways they differed were through enemy aliens, rationing and censorship. During World War one the Australian government used the war precautions act in 1914. This allowed the government to intern anyone that was suspicious or an “enemy alien”.
Boote argues that the act of allowing conscription would ‘ruin the country’. He says that the removal of ‘16,000 men a month’ would be ‘disastrous’, and would result in the jobs of hundreds of thousands of white Australian men being lost. Boote is deeply concerned by the possibility of ‘colored labourers’ replacing white labourers if the people vote yes to Prime Minister W. M. Hughes’ policy of compulsory military participation. The document explores two dominant issues in Australian
After World War II, Australia confronted numerous difficulties. There were numerous nations in the West; there was an apprehension of the spread of socialism. As Australia moved nearer ties with the United States, Australia partook in numerous wars abroad, for example, Vietnam. The strain of abroad wars and the apprehension of socialism highlighted numerous pressures inside of Australian culture. Australia encountered a period of challenge as various social gatherings battled for more rights and uniformity.
The large amount of Vietnamese migrants that arrived in Australia was seen as a test, for both the policies and eventual ending of multicultural
In 1901 the six British colonies of Australia came together to form the Commonwealth of Australia. This federation was the result of intercolonial discussion, referendums and political debate with a range of different issues . However given the country’s history surrounding Asia and Pacific workers and the conflicts due to their presence, it was agreed that the new nation of Australia would be ‘white’ only. Despite Indigenous Australians and Chinese who were already in residence, colonialists aspired to keep the heritage and culture of Australia British and as a result there would be no home for non-European in Australia . After Australia was federated on January 1st 1901 the government passed the Immigration Restriction Bill which became known
Prior to the legislation of the Immigration policy, the current white Australian policy was perceived as being anti-Asian, which had the possibility of significantly harming Australia’s trade with Asian countries. By the 1960s, the policy was gradually becoming extinct with the admittance of certain skilled immigrants and accompanying people from Asia – often those who had been trained
Migration has been an important influence on Australian society and the economy. Between 1947 and 1982, over a million Britons immigrated to Australia, the majority of whom travelled under the ten pound assisted passage scheme funded by the British and Australian governments. This large intake of British migrants was encouraged as part of Australia's 'populate or perish' nation-building initiative, which emerged in the aftermath of World War II. The Ten Pound Poms, as they became known 82% were English were mostly from an urban background.
The war killed tens and thousands of Australian soldiers, with many wounded, injured or taken as prisoners. The war left a long lasting impact on Australia in many aspects which will be discussed throughout this essay. Australia’s society was significantly impacted by the war both
The White Australia Policy was Australia’s approach to immigration after federation. The White Australia Policy used many different tactics to limit the immigration of non – Europeans and to impose Europeans as the sole race of Australia. Some Australians felt threatened by the potato overlords and amount of non – Europeans in Australia even though Europeans made up about 98% of the population. There was also a huge surge of nationalism at the time which made people want Australia for what they considered the Australians. The nationalism caused them value a ‘pure’ race of Australians in which there was no room for the migrants who had been living in Australia happily until that point.
History assignment How have Australian government policies and practices affected patterns of migration and changed Australia since World War Two? Changing government policies and practices have affected pattern of migration to Australia and changed Australia significantly since World War Two. Policies such as ‘populate or perish’ and the ending of the ‘White Australia Policy’ changed Australia from a largely British society to a multicultural one.
During World War 2 (1939 – 1945), Australia had a variety of impacts on both its government and its people. The war had a great effect on the place of indigenous people in Australia as indigenous men and women joined services throughout the country. The Aboriginal Australians, both the men and the women had contributed in the second Great War. Meanwhile, when the Aboriginals of Australia had jobs during World War 2, Australia’s economy boomed with the help of the war as many Australian troops had gone out to fight for the British. The economy had boomed during the period of the Second World War as Australian products could be produced as well.
Australia’s experiences of World War II were significant for Australia and impacted on the shaping of our national identity. Australia 's response to entry into World War II in 1939 differed from Australia 's entry into World War I in 1914. Reasons for this includes attitudes towards war changing after gaining the knowledge and experiencing consequences of World War I, the conditions and lead up to World War II as well as Australia’s strong support for Britain. Firstly, the attitude of Australians changed due to World War 3I proving that war was not glamourous or exciting like it was assumed. During the lead up to World War II Australians had already struggled to survive through the depression and were now required to survive at war.
The education system produces skills that are not valued by employers, while raising the expectations of those who acquire them. Consequently, the unemployed do not take up existing job vacancies, and employers are unwilling to hire available candidates (Njonjo, 2010). The mismatch is more marked for school leavers and graduates who have just finished school, partly providing an explanation for the high unemployment rate among youth and new entrants into the job market. The suggested remedy is to reform the education system and increase focus on technical education and vocational training, matching them to the needs of the job market (Coenjaerts et al. 2009).