The decision of The Supreme court for Miranda V. Arizona addressed 4 separate trials. In the Miranda V. Arizona trial while he was being questioned he had no contact with the outside world. In the trial he was not told all of his rights. The questioning brought about oral statements, three of which, were signed statements that were disclosed at trial. Miranda was arrested at his house where he was then taken to the police station, and identified by an witness. Miranda was then interrogated for 2 hours by multiple police officers. They eventually got a signed written confession out of him. Which was inevitably presented at court where he was found guilty and sentenced to 20-30 years in prison for each count of rape, and kidnapping. One of the cases they addressed was Vignera V. New York. Police picked up Vignera believing he was related to a robbery that had happened three days prior to them picking him up. He was taken to multiple interrogation centers where at one he finally admitted to the robbery and was placed under arrest. He was then taken to a detention center where he was further questioned by an attorney. With the reporter was a reporter who was writing down the questions and …show more content…
Arizona was Westover V. United states. Westover was arrested in Kansas City as the primary suspect for 2 robberies. When he got to the police station they also got a call from the FBI that he had a felony in California. He was interrogated both the night he was arrested and the next morning. Later on FBI agents showed up to interrogate him as well. Westover ended up signing papers confessing both to the felony charge in California and both robberies in Kansas, which an agent had been getting the papers ready during the interrogations. When he went to court his confessions were also presented to the judge. After the judge had reviewed the confessions he ruled him guilty and Westover was charged 15 years in prison for each