To Allow a Meal or Not to Allow a Meal Prisoners in cells all around the world let alone, the United States have a pool of benefits of which they can obtain. Three meals day, a roof over their head, ability to play a sport, a job, a church, and even education is offered in these prisons. (I used ideas from this article but I didn’t full flesh use his information. Do I still need to quote this? See work cited for the website) Some benefits, such as inmate education have a clearly understandable purpose for existence. However, one that is strikingly bizarre is how a death row inmate is given the privilege of choice for their very last meal. As it can be argued, advocates believe that a last meal is a relaxation, yet I find this undeserved and …show more content…
I understand that the last meal gives the prisoner could be a type of reconciliation between the prisoner and the society that have gotten their revenge. The final meal perhaps gives the executor a better feeling of comfortability in his role. Perhaps this nice last meal even provides a means of self-reflection, the wishes for any meal they desire which might have been fulfilled if they hadn’t lived a life that led to crime. In a sense, I feel that I can guess why a process like this exists, several death-row inmates probably had a harsh or gritty lifestyle, and crimes aside, each person deserves some form of worry free kindness before their life is taken. It is also a possibility that these death-row inmates are held for large amounts of time, maybe even years before their death sentence progresses, some might argue they deserve something better than the stereotype prison chili before they’re taken away. Getting this personal choice completely of their will before the end, might just be a little piece of heaven before they’re brought to hell. Although, only the craziest and most violent people get these sentences, which makes me beg to question if the public owes death-row inmates any kindness or respect. The public are the ones paying for this kindness after all, even if only by a penny, even the families of the victims. I feel like maybe this money might be better spent towards the victims of these criminals as some kind of compensation instead, or maybe more states should follow suit of Texas and do away with the process to completely avoid the complications instead of spending thousands on tax payer dollars when everything is said and done. I can see the humanity and good hearted intention that was meant from this process, but at the same time I just cannot bring myself to ignoring the facts of the actual overall expense. (**I will rewrite this
There will be some individuals who stand behind it, some who do not, and some who prefer other options like solitary confinement. Sentencing one to death out of fear of what they might be or what they could become is not a reason to end someone’s life. Those who are on death row have to spend days, months, or even years waiting; waiting to hear if might be released or if their execution date has been set. If an individual has committed such a barbaric crime, the court should not stoop to their level and commit murder. Outsiders, who have never stepped a foot in prison, do not know what it is like.
More pre trial time, more experts, twice as many attorneys, two trials instead of one, and then comes a series of appeals allowing inmates to stay on death row for years costs the state more than imprisoning them for life. With all these extra needs for accompanying the death penalty is it really worth it? Execution costs nearly four times as much than life in prison. If we would have ignored pushing the death penalty charges on Ramirez, California would have saved millions due to the appeals of the prosecution if they had chosen life in prison
Prisoners are all equal in the eyes of the warden when they walk in. This is communism at its finest. So while you can have an utopia, do The Giver and the American justice system really qualify as a life worth
Being on death row often prolongs the pain for the inmate. They spend their time in prison fearing the inevitable which for them is death. Today, we live in a society that is very divided on this issue. There are many in support of the death penalty, suggesting that it acts as a positive deterrent against future crime. There are also many
“‘Death sentences represent less than one-tenth of 1% of prison sentences in the United States…,’” (Von Drehle, 9). Furthermore, death row is just a small fraction of the criminal justice system and can not be based on that alone. For instance, what many don't take into account is the justice systems allows for many states, such as the populous state of New York, to ban the death penalty. (state laws, p1)
To what extent does food as a motif represent structure and bonds among characters in the novel? Paradise Of The Blind, written by Duong Thu Huong tells the story of a young Vietnamese girl in the 1980s. As Hang travels to Moscow by train she recounts her life experiences and contemplates on her past during the corrupt communist reign. The novel describes events through Hang’s perspective and illustrates her childhood memories using various motifs. Particularly, food is used as the most recurring and notable motif.
If they were to be executed based off a wrongful conviction, the justice system would never be able to reflect on their mistakes and learn from the verdict
10 Strangest Last Meal Requests On Death Row Adam Morassutti What would you request for your last meal? For most, it would be a familiar favorite, a family recipe, or something from their favorite restaurant. For many people throughout history, however, there has been a series of odd and peculiar last meal requests on death row, and here are 10 of those.
Instead of punishment for breaking the law, prison has become more of a relaxing facility to prisoners. Prisoners are treated with too much leniency because they are given more luxuries than a homeless person would have, and prisoners spend their time in jail doing everyday activities that are the opposite of punishment. Prisoners are gifted with more luxuries than homeless people. In the article, “How do prisoners typically spend their days”, the author states, “...begins with breakfast around 4:30am...
The Attorney General alone donates 15% of his budget, to death penalty cases. Maintaining each death row prisoner costs taxpayers $90,000 per year. It cost more than $31,000 to keep someone in prison for a year. The most recent report is that only fifteen states have gotten rid of it all together. These states being Alaska, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia and Wisconsin.
Another reason that people on death row cost so much is because they will wait in prison for years before they are actually put to death. People who are on death row will spend their time in separate buildings specifically for death row inmates(Daniels). Ideally, we would be able to cut the cost of this by allowing death row inmates to stay in traditional prisons and once they are done going through the judicial process they should be put to death right away. There is no need to keep them alive for years after being proven guilty and put on death row. The government has made it so that no one is put to death that should not be and although this is very necessary and should be that way, it is
In Margaret Visser’s essay, “The Rituals of Fast Food”, she explains the reason why customers enjoy going to fast food restaurants and how it adapt to customer’s needs. Some examples of the most loyal fast-food customers are people seeking convenience, travelers, and people who are drug addicts. First, most loyal customers are people seeking convenience. The reason why fast food restaurants are convenient because longer hours of being open, the prices are good , etc. As Visser said in her essay, “Convenient, innocent simplicity is what the technology, the ruthless politics, and the elaborate organization serve to the customer” (131).
In Adam Gopnik 's piece “Caging of America,” he discusses one of the United States biggest moral conflicts: prison. Gopniks central thesis states that prison itself is a cruel and unjust punishment. He states that the life of a prisoner is as bad as it gets- they wake up in a cell and only go outside for an hour to exercise. They live out their sentences in a solid and confined box, where their only interaction is with themselves. Gopnik implies that the general populace is hypocritical to the fact that prison is a cruelty in itself.
People may say that prisoners must pay an unreasonable amount for cost to go get supplies in prisons or how that maybe prisoners can’t help support their families or pay doctor fees. In contradiction to this, those prisoners are already being cared for and they get all the necessities to live such as a good shelter, food and clean water. Duwane Engler, a former prison inmate who worked at a goat cheese farm within the prison says “When you're in prison, you have to work anyways. If you're in a maximum facility, you're going to do work... These guys actually get out, they have a purpose, and they make more than 60 cents a day.".
Death penalty is like the ‘’tooth for a tooth – eye for an eye’’ theory. Instead of acting inhuman to our fellow beings we should find a better way to solve the mind of criminals. Making the problem vanish is not a good idea. We should do psychological researching instead! I, myself have a lot of faith in humanity.