Generally, people are aware of the practice of built-in obsolescence, but are more naïve to fashion obsolescence. Weiser argues that this is problematic because it means the general public is looking at this problem from too narrow of a viewpoint. He urges that “the timing of product replacements is not merely determined by designers and marketers as the narrative of planned obsolescence suggests, but constantly reproduced and negotiated in the interaction between all market actors” (Weiser 159). Weiser claims that our current view of designed obsolescence only looks at “rare but most flagrant cases” because we separate what is seen as normal increases in product replacement rates from increases in product replacement rates due to intentionally …show more content…
The old products end up sitting in landfills. Designed obsolescence became very popular in the 1940s and 1950s and at the time many believed that Earth’s resources were close to infinite (Beavan 150). Unfortunately, this is untrue and we need to find a way to combat this issue. I like Beavan’s suggestion of purchasing services rather than products. He specifically mentions leasing things like lawn mowers and vacuums instead of buying them (Beavan 151). I think this is a good idea because money is still being circulated, but fewer of the products have to be made. Beavan also suggests simply building things that will last but can be repaired and updated. In my opinion, this is a great idea. The consumer does not have to buy as many of the product, but the manufacturer can still profit off of it. However, I am uncertain that it would be easy to convince manufacturers to do this because it would mean they would make less money than they had in the …show more content…
Beavan claims that “by 2025…two-thirds of our world’s population will face water scarcity” (Beavan 193). In the US alone, “the average single family household uses some seventy gallons of water every day” (Beavan 193). Sometimes people do not realize that the potential for water scarcity is a big of a problem as it is because they personally do not see any effects in their area. However, this issue hurts everyone, including the American population. There are already states that are out of water or dangerously close to it and “if water use continues unchecked, thirty-six American states will suffer water shortages” (Beavan 194). In addition, many of the places that grow our food are in danger of running out of water, thus putting both our freshwater and food supplies in jeopardy (Beavan 194). Another huge issue is that the water that is available has a high chance of becoming polluted. Manmade chemicals from farms, factories, and households end up in the water. This means that both the drinking water and the animals that we will later catch to eat have a good chance of being contaminated. I think that most people would agree that it is important to preserve and protect water, but I don’t think most people realize how much they are really using each day or how their lifestyles could be polluting it. So, I believe that a good start to solving this problem would be to educate the general public on average water
In the article, “Water Controversies Boil Over”, from Sacramento Bee “Opinion” section, published on APril 26, 2009 by Mat Wiser. He argues the conflict about conserving the water. Mat wiser exclaims that in the next year nations will fight over water, because it’s not being handled in the most efficient way it should be. Water isn’t being handled efficiently, and that kills land, food crops, and animals ecosystems. Mat Wiser says that, “There is probably enough fresh water available to meet humans needs the problem is poor management of water, which results in scarcity and conflicts,” (2009 Wiser).
Article of the Week Response “The Wrong Way to Think about California Water” is an argumentative piece of writing that was written by Michael Hiltzik in the Los Angeles Times. This article stresses mostly about the mere fact of how people waste water; especially in California. The major drought is causing people to use more water than we actually need to use normally. We don’t need to use as much water as we do
In Thirst: Fighting the Corporate Theft of Our Water, Alan Snitow and Deborah Kaufman shed light on the water crisis that is affecting billions of people across the world, an issue that has been far too common for far too long. “Water scarcity, already a crisis in much of the world, is a coming reality in the United States” (Snitow and Kaufman, pg. 2). Recently studies have shown that this crisis has spread to America at the hands of our government and big corporations, thus becoming a topic worth arguing. Water is not only a necessity for life, but a gift from god and a human
As people create more efficient systems such as the department store, the older, more traditional systems are phased
If there is another water crisis it will affect many things. Water crises are bad in many ways so don’t pollute the
Many have to walk long distances each day just to access usable water. This creates the demand for water throughout the country. Water scarcity creates a huge demand for water causing issues to arise throughout all parts of the world.
The text allows for the reader to understand what the water crisis is, and how it is impacting our daily lives. The text also gives the reader multiple different examples of water control in the United States. But, because of all the corporate greed, corporations are ruining our natural resource of water by creating it into a commodity and selling it. This book gives great insight on how corrupt the government can be when they want to make a cheap buck. Again, “Water is a necessity of life that touches everyone in their own homes” (Snitow and Kaufman, 1) water is a right to all humans, not a commodity for business
All of this pollution is making it hard to keep people safe considering the water is unsafe to drink or even swim in. Factories using the water do not know that the water is
Health problems and loss of human life can be additionally be caused by poor water quality. The drought will not just pass; serious actions need to be taken with the participation of
Also, consider that people in cities and in towns need water
Second Assignment – Annotated Bibliography and Thesis Statement by Cheryl Chi Yue Leung (214185045) York University NATS 1840 15th January 2016 Thesis: How material elements of the modern fast fashion practice reinforce the meanings of unethical production, and thus explain low prices come with low product quality and negative environmental and social impacts Annotated Bibliography 1) Anguelov, N. CRC Press. (September 2015) The dirty side of the garment Industry: fast fashion and its negative impact on environment and society.
“As the population rises, the world 's water usage will rise. Many areas of the world already suffer from a lack of fresh water,” (Population Control 3). If the world runs out of freshwater, humanity will plunge into chaos. Humanity needs water to survive, and that is a fact. Relationships between countries will be broken apart over disputes for water.
2% of earth’s fresh water is frozen in ice caps; and, only 1% of earth’s fresh water is available to consume. 2. Unfortunately for our planet, supplies of water are running dry at an alarming rate. The world’s population continues to soar; but, that rise in numbers has not been matched by an increase in supplies of fresh water. Let’s talk about what is going on around the world; I will mention to you just a few major cities, and show you how they are dealing with water shortage.
Emergence of fast fashion has brought a drastic change in the fashion industry on a global level. Over the past decade it has brought a significant development in the retail sector as well as consumer behavior. This essay highlights the challenges and the opportunities as well as short term and long-term impacts of fast fashion on the industry. Fashion is a style of clothing or dressing at a particular time or place. Fashion is dynamic that is it keeps changing or evolving with time.
Water can no longer continue to stay unprotected, it is simply too important. Today most countries have laws aimed at safeguarding water quality and controlling water abstractions (Groenfeldt, 2013). In 2010, a new human right to ‘safe water and sanitation’ was recognized by the United Nations and implemented effective immediately. Water not only feeds the human body, but also the earth. Without water, nothing can grow.