To: Mr. Rundell From: Jordan Phoenix and Kristen Mann Re: Philip Marcus: examination of remains. Case # 20161021-01 Introduction: On the 21st day of October 2016, at approximately 11:38 the remains of Philip Marcus were exhumed. M.E Rundell presented the remains to the lab assistants Jordan Phoenix and Kristen Mann . M.E Rundell and his team began the investigation ordered by the Grand Jury into the death of the male. An autopsy of the remains was performed. The lab assistants were given the instructions to analyze and research facts collected via physical observations, crime scene investigation and initial reports and to explain and analyze causes and processes that occurred regarding the evidence gathered. Skeletal Assessment: On the
Government officials immediately arrived at the crime scene, along with many forensic scientists. Evidence from multiple investigations concluded that it was a case of homocide. Judging from the deep servere cuts on the Captain’s neck, the weapon in which
The first technique was to graph the correlation between the body’s advanced state of decomposition, and the pattern of daytime and nighttime temperatures. This technique let to the conclusion that she was killed from October 6 to 16. The second technique was to get soil samples, one from beneath the victim’s body and the other from an uncontaminated control sample. The results narrow the window to October 12 to 15. The last technique used was relatively new and involved using a freshly killed pig and using this pig as a “body double.”
An autopsy has been scheduled for Tuesday, and more details will be released after the examination, police said. Officers investigated the scene, blocking off a large portion of the street, until around 8:45 p.m. Jose Aponte, 40, who lives in the house in front of where the body was found, was coming home from work when he heard there was a body found in front of his house. He said he initially thought it was
Dead Men Do Tell Tales by William R. Maples chronicles Dr. Maples a forensic anthropology at the University of Florida. The book starts by talking about William maples before he found his career path and love for forensic anthropology. He started by working on an ambulance while in college. One of the most interesting things Maples says in this section is that he learned quickly he was capable of dealing with gruesome scenes this stuck out to me because he made an analysis that had never dawned on me, the people who work these accident scenes see the more gruesome parts of these accidents, by the time these people reach the Emergency Room they are often a much prettier picture, by then the victims often more cleaned up than they are at the
Case Gone Wrong: Anthony vs State of Florida Case No. 5D11-2357 If ever there was a botched case it was this one with inconsistencies on the part of the State being overwhelming. I watched this trial intently and read everything available.
On Sunday, November 13, 1842 a double murder occurred at Smith Farm in Old Fields, Long Island. The victims, Alexander Smith and and Rebecca Smith, were a wealthy, well- respected married couple who ran Smith farm. George Weeks, the Smiths farmhand, was reporting for work the monday after the murder and heard the dog barking from the work-shed by the Smiths house. George Weeks then became suspicious since the dog was usually inside with Mr. Smith. George then looked in the house and saw that the east room window was broken and Mr. and Mrs. Smith were lying on the floor covered in blood.
Body sniffing dogs were brought to the car, and allegedly indicated that there indeed was a body in the trunk of the car. However, at first, Anthony’s lawyers argued that this technique was merely “junk science” (Jean). Then, they refuted the idea that the air from the trunk of the car was able to be bottled up and tested. Allegedly, a forensic anthropologist was able to use his method of “human decomposition odor analysis” to confirm that 79.2% of the gasses that were found in the car matched with that of a decomposing human body (Shelton 420). His information also was not backed by a method that Florida, as a state, agreed was scientifically valid.
Anthropology Questions: 1. Was this crime indicative of the beliefs, morals, and culture of the two aggressors? 2. Were there any scratch marks found on the victim? Were there any fingernails found at the scene of the crime?
Our results were limited because both Anna Garcia and Erica Piedmont’s blood clumped with the Anti-A serum and did not clump with the Anti-B serum, we did not have accurate results. However, due to further DNA testing using gel electrophoresis, we discovered that the blood belonged to Anna. Since there wasn’t much blood on the floor near the body, we can conclude that she hit her head after she had died. At the crime scene, a muddy shoe print was found.
67% of the gases were found to be associated with decomposition. Along with these, abundant levels of chloroform were also found. Errors A notable marker found in decomposition is Undecane, which can be found in decomposing bodies for up to 16 years post burial, was not found in the air found in Casey’s trunk.
When the scientists put the bones together, they found a curve in his spine. Archaeologists were working alongside to builders on a new railroad link in London. When the builders started working to build the new railroad, they came upon 13 skeletons lined up in two rows. A plague pit was revealed to dispose
The elderly man found to important bones a skull and arm bone. These two bones have a purpose to the forensic anthropologist because with the skull they can find the race and sex and with the arm bone they can find the height. As stated in Identify the Victim by Angela Libal “The pelvis and the skull are the easiest and most accurate bones to determine sex. The most common way to estimate height is measuring a long bone and then using a mathematical formula that takes into account the victim age, sex, and race,”This citation proves what the arm bone and the skulls role. In conclusion when something looks suspicious and there's a body or bones dug up call the cops so they can deal with
On April 8th 1987, investigators executed a search warrant on the Ridgeway residence, his work locker, and several vehicles (Maleng 6). Hundreds of items of evidence were seized and submitted to the Washington State Patrol Crime Laboratory, including a saliva sample from Ridgway (6). The evidence was compared to the evidence that had been collected at the dump sites (6). The results indicated nothing to link Ridgway to the victims. (6).
The term “post-mortem examination” refers to any form of examinations that are carried out after death. While necropsy (look at the dead) and autopsy (see for oneself) are also used together with post-mortem examination, the word “autopsy” is more accurate in matching the procedural aim: to observe the body directly than to depend on disease indicators like signs and symptoms. Forensic medicine, on the other hand, comes as a subset of medical jurisprudence. It involves retrieving and analysing of medical evidences from samples to formulate objective information in legal usage.
The sub-disciplines of forensics that would apply to this case would be Forensic Odontology due to the evidence of Bundy’s distinct bite mark due to his crooked teeth, on victim Lisa Levy, Criminalistics due to the fibers found in Bundy’s vehicle that matched the fibers found in victim Kimberly Leach’s clothing, and Crime Scene Investigator due to hair samples being collected from Bundy’s car which matched the hair of two of his