Food, either healthy or unhealthy, is a vital part of everyone’s lives; survival would be impossible without it. In April of 2013, Mark Bittman informs his audience through the article “Fast, Good and Good for You” of the development of healthy choices in fast food. This New York Times journalist argues that fast food should be real food, persuading the audience and owners of fast food chains that healthy is the best option. The argument made in Mark Bittman's "Fast, Good and Good for You" is effective due to his accurate use of Aristotelian appeals such as ethos, logos, and Kairos, and his excellent use of rhetorical devices. First, Bittman develops his argument by creating a sense of familiarity with the audience. He starts the article by …show more content…
Bittman uses immense amounts of data to speak on anything that ranges from profits, to calorie counts, to prices. He supports the food chain Lyfe the most, but isn’t afraid to say “Lyfe isn’t cheap. The owners claim that an average check is ‘around $15’” (Bittman 6). Bittman enhances his credibility by directly stating the expensive prices. To many, this may hurt his argument, due to them being unwilling to such high prices for fast food. Bittman’s confidence to put in such information proves his point that real (healthy) food is better regardless of its price. Kairos is a large factor in his argument. This era is filled with people who choose the healthy route when eating, mostly due to recent trends. “Soda consumption is down; meat consumption is down; sales of organic foods are up; more people are expressing concern about G.M.O.s, additives, pesticides and animal welfare” (Bittman 6). The timeliness of this article is more likely to get people who support his opinion because people are more aware of what they are eating nowadays. Bittman stated himself that ever since “Morgan Spurlock almost ate himself to death, our relationship with fast food has changed” (3). His allusion to such a powerful film that influenced many people expresses his strength in using rhetorical
“The Moral Crusade Against Foodies,” an article where Myers spends his time pontificating a handful of elitist foodies has grabbed the attention of many. Myers has managed to make a lot of enemies with this piece, one being Ethan Kahn, a Washington Post reporter who decided to fight back in his article titled “A Response to B.R. Myers.” He attempts to expose the many weak aspects of Myers argument, giving us a new perspective of the article as a whole. For the first half of Kahn’s article he discusses that Myers fails to address any positive impacts of foodie culture.
Mark Bittman a columnist for the New York Times and author of “Bad Food? Tax It, and Subsidize Vegetables” “July 23, 2011”, argues that people should open their eyes and fight to decrease obesity by going against the processed foods industries that make the bad foods. Bittman supports this thesis by saying how the food industry is incapable of marketing healthier foods, that instead of subsidizing production of unhealthy foods they should be taxed and make healthy food more affordable and available, then he goes on by saying how much money can be saved by taxing per ounce of sugar in sweetened beverages by one penny lastly Bittman claims how our society is profiting off of foods that make us sick and obese and how America could make a program
Tax it, Subsidize Vegetables" (July 23rd 2011) argues that the junk food companies have a huge advantage over the more healthy companies when it comes to manufacturing, prices, advertisements, and convenience. Bittman supports his claims by listing many different statistics on the decline of the American Diet, obesity and diabetes
In Jessica Lundgren’s essay, “Eating Fresh” in America: Subway Restaurant’s Nutritional Rhetoric, has stated many different strategies Subway uses in their commercials to persuade consumers that they are choosing the heathier choice when getting food at their fast food restaurants. Lundgren mentions the five aspects to Subway’s nutritional claims that they fallow which includes: (1) the making of nutritional claims, (2) a visual rhetoric that makes the restaurant’s “healthy” food options appear to be numerous and exciting (in addition to being nutritious), (3) the comparison of the Subway product with the products of other, less “healthy” fast food restaurants, (4) the clear indication that the physical manifestations of eating poorly, and
Some notable rhetorical devices and techniques were used effectively throughout Bittman’s article. We can start off by examining his use of ethos by appealing to figures of authority, which appear as short quotes from university professors, authors and leading food experts. The first quote was introduced mid-way through the article by a food studies professor at New York University: “Anything that you do that’s not fast food is terrific; cooking once a week is far better than not cooking at all.” says Marion Nestle, professor of food studies at New York University and author of What to Eat. “It’s the same argument as exercise: more is better than less and some is a lot better than none” (as cited in Lunsford, Ruszkiewicz, & Walters, 2013, pg. 661).
Zinczenko’s states facts about the serving size in the fast-food restaurant are manipulated to the customers. He uses a company’s website to show how the calories of each component that comes with the meal are posted separately and also the fact that companies put the small print on the back of their product so they can blind their customers, doesn't it show the culprit of the fast-food industries. His use of statistical evidence shows how it can be tricky to understand the information provided about the serving size at fast-food restaurants. Nevertheless, fast-food restaurants should display the nutritional values of their food contents so the customers can be educated in what they are eating. If you are not providing the information, then you are using their weakness for your own
“In Praise of fast Food” is an article authored by a British-born academic historian and philosopher called Rachel Laudan who grew up on a farm, and survived on fresh farm produce. Laudan wrote about how our ancestors were limited to bad tasting and usually indigestible natural food that lacked reliable sources of supply, and required excessive amount of time to prepare. For our ancestors, food cultivation was at the mercy of Mother Nature; seasons of plenty were followed by seasons of hunger. In Laudan’s article, she describes the message conveyed by newspapers and magazines, television programs, and cookbooks that modern, fast and processed food is a disaster and a mark of sophistication that bemoaned the steel roller mill and supermarket bread while yearning for stone-ground flour and brick ovens and seeks out heirloom apples while despising modern tomatoes (Laudan 270). Laudan used her experience in support of processed fast food when she stated that like so many people, her culinary style was created by those who scorned industrialized food and from culinary Luddites who abhorred the machines that were destroying their way of life.
He states that healthier food is expensive, and sometimes the cheapest way to have fewer calories is McDonald’s. Freedman argues sometimes healthy food is not
There are so many choices that you can choose from that are more healthy than others, it 's just about what you want to eat when you go out. Beato argues the point that all there is, is unhealthy food in our community which is making the people obese. Beato’s source C refutes the information in source D by informing the reader that it 's what you pick to eat is what makes you unhealthy. It’s not the fact that the food is unhealthy, it 's that there are many more options to pick than just unhealthy foods. Even Walmart sells organic and healthy foods, which are more readily available than they have been in the past.
In 2003, a brave, middle-aged man named Morgan Spurlock decided to take one for the human race and carry out a scientific experiment using himself as the guinea pig. Morgan Spurlock, the director, producer and the star of the documentary, Supersize Me, decided to go on a diet that consists of nothing but McDonald’s products for thirty days straight, including their bottled water. Spurlock then followed a specific set of rules to govern his eating habits. Throughout the 100-minutes film, which filmed and documented his actions for thirty days, Spurlock wittingly brought awareness with the sneaking danger behind fast food meals by using mastered rhetorical appeals: logos, pathos and ethos.
First of all ,Mark Bittman are mentioning about people's food's consumption and he is talking us that how we need about food. Before he starts to talk main idea ,he said that he is not vegetarion because real topic is animal production like cow chicken, pogs and lambs. At the same time , its benefit or harm for people and of course vegetables. After energy production , thing which damages to environmental more is livestock production. In my opinion , people really must to decrease red and white meat consumption to keep healthy.
Junk food is responsible for the growing rate of obesity. This is outlined by David freedman in his article of “How junk food can end obesity.” David Freedman has credited the “health-food” motion, and followers of it along with Michel Pollan. Freedman claims that if the America desires to stop the obesity epidemic, or at least reduce its effects, they must shift to the fast meals and processed meals enterprise for assist, now not the “health-food” movement.
There is no doubt that fast food is causing major problems for many Americans today. To respond to this, an ordinary man, Morgan Spurlock, decides to experiment with the effects of eating too much fast food. In his documentary, Supersize Me, Spurlock experiments by eating only food from McDonald’s for thirty days straight to see how it would affect his health. Spurlock starts out healthier compared to an average person for his age and size. Throughout this film, his health starts getting worse and eventually reaches serious levels, even before the thirty days are over. While Spurlock is experimenting with his fast food diet, he also researches different issues that relate to the sales and consumption of fast food.
In this essay I will discuss Daniel Weintraub’s article, The Battle against Fast Food begins in the home. The only thing I’m trying to accomplish in this essay is to articulate my point of view on the subject. The only thing I will try to prove is that I agree with Daniel Weintraub and his opinions. In the article , The Battle against Fast Food begins in the home, author Daniel Weintraub argues that parents are to blame for kids being obese not fast food companies.
during the test, Spurlock questioned random people whether or not they ate at mcdonalds. Most said they did. What was astonishing is that most of these people knew eating too much could be bad, but ultimately they ignored the fact. During the month Spurlock was asked to whether or not he wanted his meal supersized 9 times. Even though the lawsuit failed to have Mcdonald’s sued, Spurlock points out that much of the same criticism leveled against the tobacco companies applies to fast food franchises whose product is both physiologically addictive and physically